It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 10:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# SC : PT : Carbon Dioxide

Author Message
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

SC : PT : Carbon Dioxide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2005, 16:04
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:33) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

An Excellent Question:

According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century.

(A) that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison
(B) should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison
(C) should the present rate of buildup be continued, the global concentration of this poison
(D) the global concentration of this poison, were the present rate of buildup continue,
(E) that the global concentration of this poison, if the present rate of buildup did continue,

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : PT : Carbon Dioxide [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2005, 16:22
(A) that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 848

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 May 2005, 16:37
One more for 'A'

We need 'so rapidly.......that', so between A & E, A is better

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 May 2005, 22:18
sonaketu wrote:
Can someone refute E.

consider the followings:
(E) that the global concentration of this poison, if the present rate of buildup did continue.

present and did?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

09 May 2005, 01:05
I'll go with (E) on this one. The phrase "if the present rate of buildup did continue" serves to modify 'concentration of this poison'. Removing the second phrase, will make the original sentence:

According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century

I did not find 'did' offending. In hypothetical situations, it is common to use a past tense. E.g. "If I were rich, I would ..."

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2005, 01:13
ywilfred wrote:
I'll go with (E) on this one. The phrase "if the present rate of buildup did continue" serves to modify 'concentration of this poison'. Removing the second phrase, will make the original sentence:

According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century

I did not find 'did' offending. In hypothetical situations, it is common to use a past tense. E.g. "If I were rich, I would ..."

IMO E would have been correct if it were "if the present rate of buildup does continue" or better still "if the present rate of buildup continues"

you can never jump two tenses (past to future) in conditionals

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2005, 02:48
Since the sentence is subjunctive, "continue" is the right usage. But did was not required.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2005, 08:05
A

(A) that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison should...will... is idiomatic

(E) that the global concentration of this poison, if the present rate of buildup did continue, did makes this sentence wrong (if....were...to continue is correct)

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2005, 15:54
Yes it is between (A) and (E).

When I was attempting this question, I picked (E). I was racing against time and as soon as I saw "should", I eliminated it thinking that we need an Independent clause (Not any dependent Clause or sth else). I did not bother to read the whole sentence.

While revising, I observed that portion after "should" is an Independent Clause. It is an Subject-Verb Inversion. This question befooled me successfully .

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2005, 15:54
Of course OA is (A).

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 May 2005, 05:25
Vithal wrote:
IMO E would have been correct if it were "if the present rate of buildup does continue" or better still "if the present rate of buildup continues"

you can never jump two tenses (past to future) in conditionals

What is the "tense" for "would"? Isnt it future tense, no? Or is it only used to describe "hypothetical situations"? But every verb/participle should have a tense, right? So wouldnt "would" be future tense?

If i were [past tense] you, I would [future tense???] take the job offer?

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 May 2005, 17:11
gmataquaguy wrote:
Vithal wrote:
IMO E would have been correct if it were "if the present rate of buildup does continue" or better still "if the present rate of buildup continues"

you can never jump two tenses (past to future) in conditionals

What is the "tense" for "would"? Isnt it future tense, no? Or is it only used to describe "hypothetical situations"? But every verb/participle should have a tense, right? So wouldnt "would" be future tense?

If i were [past tense] you, I would [future tense???] take the job offer?

http://cctc.commnet.edu/grammar/conditional.htm

would is an auxillary verb and can be used to express past - the following link will help in getting a better understanding:
http://cctc.commnet.edu/grammar/auxiliary.htm

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

10 May 2005, 17:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# SC : PT : Carbon Dioxide

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.