Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 30 May 2017, 04:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# SC # traditional Japanese clothing

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1710
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 14:32
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (01:15) correct 20% (01:13) wrong based on 22 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

3. In the traditional Japanese household, most clothing could be packed flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities.
(A) flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities
(B) flat, and so elaborate closet facilities were unnecessary
(C) flatly, and so there was no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(D) flat, there being no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(E) flatly, as no elaborate closet facilities were necessary
_________________

hey ya......

If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1112
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 14:54
B.

to me, flatly is not correct adverb. Flat is correct(irregular adverb where its not suffixed by -ly).

B is concise.

D. uses of "there being" is awkward
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 592
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 15:04
In A "it" doesn't have a clear reference. The reference for "it" can be both "traditional Japanese household and clothing". A is wrong. In E we are comparing "no elaborate closet facilities" with "traditional Japanese household", which is wrong. D is wron because we wrongly use the past tense. Between B and C, B is better. "There was no necessity" is wordy and less concise than "elaborate closet facilities were unnecessary". B is the correct answer.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1885
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 19:36
nakib77 wrote:
3. In the traditional Japanese household, most clothing could be packed flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities.
(A) flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities
(B) flat, and so elaborate closet facilities were unnecessary
(C) flatly, and so there was no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(D) flat, there being no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(E) flatly, as no elaborate closet facilities were necessary

Well, A. C and E are wrong due to the use of "flatly" ...it should be " flat" . Think of the case of "keep" , after "keep", there should be an adjective; for example:Everything in the room was kept tidy.D should be avoided due to the use of "being"

I go for B.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5218
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 404 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2005, 10:31
I also got B. ETS always prefers unnecessary over not necessary.

Interesting sentence
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 454
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2005, 12:42
Another B

We have B and D from POE. D is out because of "being" and B is more concise/clear.
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2740
Location: New York City
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 943 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2007, 03:35
nakib77 wrote:
3. In the traditional Japanese household, most clothing could be packed flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities.
(A) flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities
(B) flat, and so elaborate closet facilities were unnecessary
(C) flatly, and so there was no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(D) flat, there being no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(E) flatly, as no elaborate closet facilities were necessary

Example:
a lovely dinner
NOT a dinner lovely

Therefore, ACE are wrong. BD are left. being is hardly ever correct on the GMAT.

B.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 864
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 411 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2007, 05:35
bmwhype2 wrote:
nakib77 wrote:
3. In the traditional Japanese household, most clothing could be packed flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities.
(A) flatly, and so it was not necessary to have elaborate closet facilities
(B) flat, and so elaborate closet facilities were unnecessary
(C) flatly, and so there was no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(D) flat, there being no necessity for elaborate closet facilities
(E) flatly, as no elaborate closet facilities were necessary

Example:
a lovely dinner
NOT a dinner lovely

Therefore, ACE are wrong. BD are left. being is hardly ever correct on the GMAT.

B.

"packed" is actually a verb in this case. Adverbs (in a context) such as "fast", "flat", "high" are used without "+ly"
E.g. -He runs fast (Incorrect: He runs fastly)
-Throw high (Incorrect: throw highly)
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 152
Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2017, 19:02
to my acknowledge, there can't be a "," before "and"
correct me if i'm wrong.
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1013
Followers: 345

Kudos [?]: 934 [1] , given: 28

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2017, 03:34
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
YangYichen, it's fairly common to use a comma before "and." This happens all the time in lists. That usage is what we call the Oxford Comma, and while not everyone agrees on this usage, it's what the GMAT uses. (I'm also a fan!)

Correct: I like peanut butter, chocolate, and maple syrup.
Incorrect (according to me and the GMAT, but not to everyone): I like peanut butter, chocolate and maple syrup.

Another common situation in which we put a comma before "and" shows up in the original question. This is when we are using "and" to join two independent clauses:

I like peanut butter, and I put it on everything.
Clothing could be packed flat, so we didn't need elaborate closets.

Now if we don't have two clauses, you're right that we don't generally put a comma into the predicate of the sentence unless it's needed for clarity.

Correct: I like peanut butter and put it on everything. (There's no subject in the second part, so there's no new clause and no need for a comma. Note that in the sentence I just wrote, I follow the comma rule again! "There's no new clause" is a clause. )
Correct: Clothing could be packed flat and kept out of closets.

I hope this helps!
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 152
Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2017, 05:45
DmitryFarber i got what u mean~thx a lot~then i can't eliminate any choices just for the ",and" situation~
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 With American cryptanalysts breaking the Japanese code, the Japanese I 2 15 Feb 2017, 09:17
11 Among the largest of the flying squirrels is the Japanese 10 09 Feb 2017, 06:29
3 The problem with the traditional view of stegosaurs is that 9 05 Oct 2012, 04:41
1 SC - japanese household 8 07 Jun 2016, 16:28
18 Japanese researchers are producing a series of robots that 17 18 Feb 2017, 09:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by