Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Status:Fighting the beast.
Posts: 151
Own Kudos [?]: 939 [136]
Given Kudos: 36
Concentration: Accounting
Schools:Pitt, Oregon, LBS...
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [14]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 4
Send PM
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8810 [11]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [5]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1. B

A) the research is being done on the “ dream process” and not the drug so this option gets ruled out
B) it has been clearly mentioned that LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites
C) The locus ceruleus which will increase the alertness and mental focus which is the function of norepinephrine
D) LSd simulates norepinephrine and inhibits serotonin
E)can have hallucinations…not mandate that it will happen

2.

First passage: Jacob postulated some theory which is further taken up by the researchers to have undersatanding of role of transmitters on normal sleep and effect of hallucinogenic drugs on them.
Second :theory is described. Function of transmitter on normal sleep and the whole process how is dreaming and sleeping occur. (first part of the research)
Third passage:How LSD effect on transmitters which can result in hallucination(second part of the research)
In the end of third passage, author states that the research done in this field is promising but inconclusive.

to outline a theory and suggest options for further research( theory is outlined but no suggestions have been provided for further research)
to act as an advocate for additional research to help elucidate a particular theory's validity ( if author is advocating the research then the last statement of third passage would be not in place)
to introduce a theoretical construct that has not yet been sufficiently proven
to demonstrate the complexities involved in conducting a certain type of scientific research( no complexities involved in conducting the research have been discussed…only the theory has been explained)
to articulate a hypothesis and lay out the case for proving it( it can be considered as hypothesis but no case have been put forward to prove itas the last line suggests …theory is promising but inconclusive…which means not proved fully)

3.

Central premise would be: the absence of norepinephrine was required to enable the brain to remain asleep, while the absence of serotonin was necessary to allow dreaming to occur.

A)LSD does not cause as much long-term neurological damage as previously thought.( this somehow does not go with the context so I eliminated this option)
B) Serotonin and norepinephrine rise and fall in tandem.( which goes with the theory, both needs to be absent for dreaming)
C) Researchers prove conclusively that the level of norepinephrine in the brain is a significant factor in enabling the brain to sleep. ( yes it is as absence of this would only cause to sleep but in last passage it is given that there can be chances of person dreaming when awake when norepinephrine is accelerated and Serotonin is restrained but still it is a significant factor which very well goes with passage)
D) Some semi-synthetic hallucinogenic drugs other than LSD do not inhibit serotonin.
E) The first four stages of sleep are as crucial to the process of dreaming as is the fifth stage. ( which is also fine)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [4]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
4
Kudos
i took 7 minutes and got answers
b
c
b

but as per OA 3rd one is D

Ok B is also strong
but D it should be because in passage it is mentioned that LSD which inhibits serotonin induces dreams
so if we have a semi-hallucinogenic drug that induces hallucination(dreams while awake) without inhibiting serotonin then Jacob's central premise that amount of serotonin needs to be less for dreaming falls flat.

Yeah it was a toughie
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Got all right and it took aroun 5-6minutes.

And it's a bit late but if this is helpful to any future students:
In Q 1, A is not right because the sentence (The research thus far is promising but inconclusive; future scientific advances should allow this theory to be tested more rigorously) that people are referring to actually means the whole research and not the research of the drug only.
In Q3, B is wrong beause the question is what would MOST hinder, not what would hinder. The right answer (D) would be the one that hinders the theory most.

:)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [5]
Given Kudos: 13
GPA: 3.55
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Explanation for #3:

"(D) Some semi-synthetic hallucinogenic drugs other than LSD do not inhibit serotonin."

It may seem Out of Scope at first -- why would we bring in some other drug in the "argument." Tricky as it is, the answer choice actually implies that there are other hallucinogenic drugs other than LSD that still perform their main function--make one hallucinate--despite its inability to inhibit serotonin (unlike LSD).

Hence, if it is true that there are other drugs that make people hallucinate without inhibiting serotonin, then the whole argument of the author collapses since his underlying premise is that the inhibition of serotonin is a necessary condition.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 343
Own Kudos [?]: 4586 [0]
Given Kudos: 606
Concentration: Technology, Other
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
Top Contributor
8.40 mins
Q2:
P1: Hypothesis is introduced.
P3: Author asks for future research to test the validity of theory. "future scientific advances should allow this theory to be tested more rigorously."
A)to outline a theory and suggest options for further research
B)to act as an advocate for additional research to help elucidate a particular theory's validity
C)to introduce a theoretical construct that has not yet been sufficiently proven
D)to demonstrate the complexities involved in conducting a certain type of scientific research
E)to articulate a hypothesis and lay out the case for proving it

Q3:
Jacobs employed these advances to postulate that dreams and hallucinations share a common neurochemical mechanism with respect to the neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine that accounts for the observable similarities between the two states of mind.
....
The Jacobs hypothesis held that the absence of norepinephrine was required to enable the brain to remain asleep, while the absence of serotonin was necessary to allow dreaming to occur.
.......
If the drug stimulates norepinephrine, thereby precluding sleep, and inhibits serotonin, which Jacobs had postulated was a necessary condition for dreaming, then the resulting hallucinations could merely be “dreaming while awake.”

D: Some semi-synthetic hallucinogenic drugs other than LSD do not inhibit serotonin. //There are some medicine exception to J's hypothesis.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Status:The best is yet to come.....
Posts: 397
Own Kudos [?]: 832 [2]
Given Kudos: 235
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
2
Kudos
The passage says LSD ................... bind .......the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, whereas option B says the neuron receptor sites ........ bind serotonin will also bind the drug. Isn't it reverse? Moreover, how can we infer that receptor sites also bind drug?

I also don't understand why not it E.
The passage says 'at doses higher than 20 micrograms, it can have a hallucinogenic effect' which is in line of choice E.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 324 [0]
Given Kudos: 106
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
mohitmohansahu wrote:
Scientific advances in the twentieth century have allowed researchers to study the chemical activities taking place in the sleeping human brain. In the 1970s, researcher Barry Jacobs drew on these advances to propose that a shared neurochemical basis in the neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine accounts for the observable similarities between dreams and hallucinations. To test Jacobs’ theory, researchers attempted to elucidate the role of serotonin and norepinephrine in the normal sleep cycle and the effect of hallucinogenic drugs on these neurotransmitters.
Serotonin appears important for managing sleep, mood, and appetite, among other functions, while norepinephrine facilitates alertness and mental focus. Both neurotransmitters are discharged in high quantities only during waking states. At the onset of sleep, the neurons that release these neurotransmitters become less active, allowing the brain to enter the three non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) stages of sleep. The non-REM stages typically are not associated with normal dreaming, though parasomnias, such as sleepwalking and confusional arousals, are most common during stage 3. When the brain is ready to enter the fourth stage, REM, which is strongly associated with dreaming, the levels of these two chemicals drop virtually to zero. The Jacobs hypothesis held that the absence of norepinephrine was required to enable the brain to remain asleep, while the absence of serotonin was necessary to allow dreaming to occur.
Lysergic acid diethylamide, or LSD, is a semi-synthetic psychedelic drug which causes significant alteration of the senses; at doses higher than 20 micrograms, it can have a hallucinogenic effect. LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, largely inhibiting normal transmission. In addition, the drug causes the Locus coeruleus, a cluster of neurons containing norepinephrine, to greatly accelerate activity. If the drug stimulates norepinephrine, thereby precluding sleep, and inhibits serotonin, creating a necessary condition for dreaming, then the resulting hallucinations could merely be “dreaming while awake.” The research thus far is promising but inconclusive; future scientific advances should allow this theory to be tested more rigorously.


Q1. Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the central premise of the Jacobs hypothesis?
1. LSD does not cause as much long-term neurological damage as previously thought.
2. Serotonin and norepinephrine are found to rise and fall in tandem.
3. Researchers prove conclusively that the level of norepinephrine in the brain is a significant factor in enabling the brain to sleep.
4. Some semi-synthetic hallucinogenic drugs other than LSD do not inhibit serotonin.
5. The first three stages of sleep are as crucial to the process of dreaming as the fourth stage.

Q2. The author discusses the Locus coeruleus in order to
1. demonstrate that lysergic acid diethylamide causes hallucinations
2. confirm that Jacobs’ hypothesis was valid
3. illustrate how lysergic acid diethylamide induces dreaming
4. explain the mechanism by which a hallucinogenic drug affects a certain neurotransmitter
5. establish that norepinephrine is necessary in order to stimulate activity in the Locus coeruleus

In Q1 I was able to eliminate the options 1, 2,3 & 5. Although the right answer is option 4, I am unable to understand the line of reasoning.
In Q2, I am confused between Options 3 and 4. The context appears to be the same in both the options, but the correct answer is 4. please explain.



Hi, I got Q2 correct but was confused at Q1 too.
In Q2, I guess you know how to eliminate options 1, 2, and 5. The following is the reason why I think Option 3 is wrong:

In addition, the drug causes the Locus coeruleus, a cluster of neurons containing norepinephrine, to greatly accelerate activity. If the drug stimulates norepinephrine, thereby precluding sleep, and inhibits serotonin, creating a necessary condition for dreaming, then the resulting hallucinations could merely be “dreaming while awake.”

The drug has 2 activities: stimulating norepine to preclude sleep, and inhibiting serotonin to create dreaming. "Locus coeruleus" is related to stimulating norepine (underlined words), and has nothing to do with inhibiting serotonin (bold lines). That is the reason why Option 4, not Op3, is correct
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4548 [6]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
6
Kudos
Explanation for Q5:

The second half of paragraph two discusses the stages of sleep, including stage 4.

(A) While it might be reasonable to assume that the four stages generally occur in order, the passage does not provide any information to infer that the fourth stage occurs only after passing through the first three.

(B) The passage states that parasomnias are “most common during stage 3”; the passage provides no information about whether parasomnias occur during stage 4.

(C) CORRECT. The fourth sentence of paragraph two says that the non-REM stages are not associated with normal dreaming. The fifth sentence then says that “the fourth stage, REM…is strongly associated with dreaming.”

(D) The passage does say that certain neurotransmitter levels “drop virtually to zero” during the fourth stage. The passage does not indicate, however, that the levels “fluctuate” (move up and down) during that stage.

(E) The passage says that the levels of the two neurotransmitters drop “when the brain is ready to enter the fourth stage.” This means the levels drop before the brain enters the fourth stage, not as a result of entering it.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8810 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1. According to the passage, which of the following is true of the drug lysergic acid diethlyamide?
A)Research into the drug is promising but inconclusive.
B)The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug.
C)The locus ceruleus causes the drug to affect bodily systems more rapidly than normal.
D)The drug stimulates norepinephrine and serotonin.
E)A person who ingests more than 20 micrograms of the drug will have hallucinations.

LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, largely inhibiting normal transmission. --
As per option B , The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug. -- can we use WILL here ? The above statement in passage states that LSD mimics well enough to bind at most (NOT ALL) --> So , there will be some sites , in which LSD won't be able to bind .
In my opinion, the usage of WILL in option B is incorrect.

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert ,chetan2u , other experts- please help
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 234
Own Kudos [?]: 398 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
1. According to the passage, which of the following is true of the drug lysergic acid diethlyamide?
A)Research into the drug is promising but inconclusive.
B)The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug.
C)The locus ceruleus causes the drug to affect bodily systems more rapidly than normal.
D)The drug stimulates norepinephrine and serotonin.
E)A person who ingests more than 20 micrograms of the drug will have hallucinations.

LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, largely inhibiting normal transmission. --
As per option B , The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug. -- can we use WILL here ? The above statement in passage states that LSD mimics well enough to bind at most (NOT ALL) --> So , there will be some sites , in which LSD won't be able to bind .
In my opinion, the usage of WILL in option B is incorrect.

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , sayantanc2k, DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert ,chetan2u , other experts- please help


Hi Skywalker18!

Happy to help :-)

Here, I think we can interpret "sites" as referring to "some sites". For example, if we say:

Ticks carry Lyme Disease.

We aren't saying that ALL ticks carry Lyme Disease -- we are saying that ticks are able to carry Lyme Disease, and some ticks do carry Lyme Disease. This may not be the most precise language, but unfortunately it is very common. So here, that's what's going on -- when it says "receptor sites bind to LSD", that means "receptor sites are able to bind to LSD", and "some receptor sites do bind to LSD". I agree with you that the language is not very precise, and could be worded better, but again, it's something that you might run into, and should be aware of :-)

Hope that helps!
-Carolyn
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 77 [0]
Given Kudos: 273
Location: Taiwan
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.34
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
Mahmud6 wrote:
The passage says LSD ................... bind .......the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, whereas option B says the neuron receptor sites ........ bind serotonin will also bind the drug. Isn't it reverse? Moreover, how can we infer that receptor sites also bind drug?

I also don't understand why not it E.
The passage says 'at doses higher than 20 micrograms, it can have a hallucinogenic effect' which is in line of choice E.




I think its the word "can". It has the ability to cause hallucination; it does not mean it will.
I agree neuron receptor site is not the same as neurotransmitter's receptor sites. Neuron and neurotransmitter are completely two different things. A poor question in my opinion; writer clearly doesn't have much background in biopsychology/human physiology.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [5]
Given Kudos: 658
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1. According to the passage, which of the following is true of the drug lysergic acid diethlyamide?

(A) Research into the drug is promising but inconclusive. not into the drug but rather its effect in terms of dreaming

(B) The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug. " LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, largely inhibiting normal transmission."

(C) The locus ceruleus causes the drug to affect bodily systems more rapidly than normal. the other way around": " In addition, the drug causes the locus ceruleus..."

(D) The drug stimulates norepinephrine and serotonin. the drug actually suppresses serotonin: "LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter’s receptor sites, largely inhibiting normal transmission"

(E) A person who ingests more than 20 micrograms of the drug will have hallucinations. "will" is too strong as the passages mentions only "can"

2. Which of the following best represents the author's primary goal in writing the passage?

(A) to outline a theory and suggest options for further research options, no - a detailed theory is discussed and that it is yet inconclusive

(B) to act as an advocate for additional research to help elucidate a particular theory's validity "advocate" is too strong

(C) to introduce a theoretical construct that has not yet been sufficiently proven correct

(D) to demonstrate the complexities involved in conducting a certain type of scientific research this may be true, but if anything, "complexities" aren't the focus of the passage

(E) to articulate a hypothesis and lay out the case for proving it "proving" is wrong because the study is inconclusive

3. Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the central premise of the Jacobs hypothesis? The central idea: "The Jacobs hypothesis held that the absence of norepinephrine was required to enable the brain to remain asleep, while the absence of serotonin was necessary to allow dreaming to occur "

(A) LSD does not cause as much long-term neurological damage as previously thought. this is a clear outsider

(B) Serotonin and norepinephrine rise and fall in tandem. this would actually give more credence to the theory

(C) Researchers prove conclusively that the level of norepinephrine in the brain is a significant factor in enabling the brain to sleep. not sure about serotonine, but this would seem to go in line with the theory

(D) Some semi-synthetic hallucinogenic drugs other than LSD do not inhibit serotonin. correct, since we would expect significantly reduce, if not remove, serotonine to allow dreaming and hallucinations

(E) The first four stages of sleep are as crucial to the process of dreaming as is the fifth stage. "fifth" is not given

4. According to the passage, all of the following are true EXCEPT

(A) Norepinephrine and serotonin are discharged only during waking states. correct: "Both neurotransmitters are discharged in high quantities only during waking states"

(B) Ingesting more than 20 micrograms of LSD will cause some people to hallucinate. "at doses higher than 20 micrograms, it can have a hallucinogenic effect"

(C) Rapid eye movement is the stage of sleep during which people dream. "At the onset of sleep,<...> the brain to enter the three non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) stages of sleep. <...> When the brain is ready to enter the fourth stage"

(D) LSD causes neurons to increase the rate at which they discharge norepinephrine. " the drug causes the locus ceruleus to greatly accelerate activity."

(E) The absence of serotonin seems to be necessary in order to enable the brain to dream. "The Jacobs hypothesis held that <...> the absence of serotonin was necessary to allow dreaming to occur

5. The passage implies which of the following about the fourth stage of sleep?

(A) One enters the fourth stage of sleep only after passing through the first three stages. "only" is a stretch

(B) Parasomnias, such as sleepwalking and confusional arousals, don’t occur during the fourth stage of sleep. "The non-REM stages typically are not associated with normal dreaming, though parasomnias, such as sleepwalking and confusional arousals, are most common during stage 3" so this leaves space to interpret that they may occur in other stages

(C) “Normal” dreaming occurs more frequently during the fourth stage of sleep than during the first three. correct: "The non-REM stages typically are not associated with normal dreaming <...> the fourth stage, REM, which is strongly associated with dreaming"

(D) Certain neurotransmitter levels fluctuate rapidly during the fourth stage of sleep. "certain" is ambiguous, and other transmitters aren't discussed in the passage

(E) Serotonin and norepinephrine drop as the result of the brain entering the fourth stage of sleep. the other way around: "the absence of norepinephrine was required to enable the brain to remain asleep, while the absence of serotonin was necessary to allow dreaming to occur"

I hope this will be helpful.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 178 [1]
Given Kudos: 186
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
please explain q4.
Clearly given : Both neurotransmitters are discharged in high quantities only during waking states
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2020
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 143
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
Dear Sajjad1994 (or any other expert)

Can you please help me with question 1?

I do not agree with the answer and believe it is open to debate as it is not an official question.

Here is what the passage states:
"LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter???s receptor sites"

And here is what option B states:
"The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug."

I disagree with B because I believe what it says and what passage says does not overlap. The reason is the subtle difference in meaning. The passage says that LSD can bind MOST of the receptor sites. Whereas option B means it WILL bind the receptor sites. Here "WILL" implies that LSD will bind with 100% probability but the passage says "IT IS NOT 100% THOUGH IT CAN BE 99.9999999%".

One may argue that the word "normally" in option B gives that meaning. However, I do not think so because the placement of "normally", which is an adverb, modifies the verb "bind". To me, it gives a meaning around "these receptor sites bind seratonin, but NOT ALWAYS" (talks about the FREQUENCY of binding), and this meaning does not even come close to what passage uses "AT MOST" (this one talks about the NUMBER of receptors).

In short FREQUENCY of binding is not equal to NUMBER of receptors.

Many thx in advance
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32915 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
higuyi wrote:
Dear Sajjad1994 (or any other expert)

Can you please help me with question 1?

I do not agree with the answer and believe it is open to debate as it is not an official question.

Here is what the passage states:
"LSD mimics serotonin well enough to be able to bind at most of the neurotransmitter???s receptor sites"

And here is what option B states:
"The neuron receptor sites that normally bind serotonin will also bind the drug."

I disagree with B because I believe what it says and what passage says does not overlap. The reason is the subtle difference in meaning. The passage says that LSD can bind MOST of the receptor sites. Whereas option B means it WILL bind the receptor sites. Here "WILL" implies that LSD will bind with 100% probability but the passage says "IT IS NOT 100% THOUGH IT CAN BE 99.9999999%".

One may argue that the word "normally" in option B gives that meaning. However, I do not think so because the placement of "normally", which is an adverb, modifies the verb "bind". To me, it gives a meaning around "these receptor sites bind seratonin, but NOT ALWAYS" (talks about the FREQUENCY of binding), and this meaning does not even come close to what passage uses "AT MOST" (this one talks about the NUMBER of receptors).

In short FREQUENCY of binding is not equal to NUMBER of receptors.

Many thx in advance


Please read the explanation provided in the link below

https://gmatclub.com/forum/scientific-a ... l#p1731256

Thank you
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
Please explain q5. Why isn't E the answer?
Current Student
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Status:On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Posts: 254
Own Kudos [?]: 168 [0]
Given Kudos: 148
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V23
GMAT 2: 530 Q39 V24
GMAT 3: 580 Q46 V24 (Online)
GMAT 4: 640 Q50 V26
GPA: 3.82
WE:Other (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
VeritasKarishma mam Kindly explain this passage as I am unable to comprehend
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Scientific advances in the latter half of the twentieth century have a [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne