It is currently 10 Dec 2017, 17:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2005, 07:12
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to increase its resistance to insect pests. According to farmersâ€™ report, the amount of insecticide needed per acre to control insect pests was only slightly lower for those who tried the modified seed than for those who did not. Therefore, since the modified seed costs more than ordinary seed without producing yields of higher market value, switching to the modified seed would be unlikely to benefit most cotton farmers economically.

Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?

A. Whether farmers who tried the modified cotton seed had ever tried growing other crops from genetically modified seed.
B. Whether the insecticides typically used on ordinary cotton tend to be more expensive than insecticides typically used on other crops.
C. Whether for most farms who grow cotton it is their primary crop
D. Whether the farmers who have tried the modified speed planted as many acres of cotton, on average, as farmers using the ordinary seed did.
E. Whether most of the farmers who tried the modified seed did so because they had previously had to use exceptionally large quantities of insecticide.

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2005, 07:38
It seems to me that E is correct since knowing whether the farmers tried the modified seed because they were looking for a cost advantage by not using large quantities of insecticide would help in evaluating the argument that they would not have a cost advantage.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2005, 07:40
I think it should be 'B'.

A - Irrelevant
C - Irrelevant
D - Out. Since argument talks about "the amount of insecticide needed per acre". So, information about area will not help.
E - Out. It does not matter even if farmers are using it because they had to use exceptionally large quantities of insecticide; it does not help evaluate argument.

'B' can help. Even if quantity of insecticide needed for modified seeds is slightly lesser than that for ordinary seeds, it will make large difference if the cost of insecticide is much more.

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2005, 07:49
B is my choice.

We are talking about costs. Unless we know the cost of pesticides, we will not be able to draw a solid conclusion as to whether the new seed is an effective solution or not.

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2005, 08:03
I think it should be D

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2005, 09:43
I think E is correct for a different reason. The farmers report says that the benefit is slight for only one acre. However, if as E asks whether the farmers are using exceptionally large quantities of insecticide, then the savings as a result of using the new cotton seed would be noticeable.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 477

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2005, 08:14
IMO E is the answer, because if the farmers did not go to genetically modififed cotton for insecticide cost saving (let us say they went for it because it grows faster) then the argument (the genetically modificed seed is unlikely to benefit the farmers) falls apart..
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2005, 08:34
E.

GA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 894

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2005, 08:47
B.

If insecticides typically used on ordinary cotton tend to be more expensive than insecticides typically used on other crops, then it might be beneficial to farmers to use modified seeds even if they cost more w/o producing yields of higher values.

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

15 Aug 2005, 08:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.