Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 03:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 May 2012
Posts: 15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 17

Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2012, 04:17
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

84% (01:13) correct 16% (00:25) wrong based on 37 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company's stock make a public disclosure of the purchase.

A. make
B. will also make
C. to make
D. must make
E. must then make

What do you think? Shall we use the rule of Expressions that are followed by a Verb Word (the infinite w/o the TO) here? (ask, demand, require, desire and etc.)
If you have any questions
New!
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3846
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 822

Kudos [?]: 6334 [2] , given: 324

Re: section 13 d 3 of the securities exchange act of 1934 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2012, 06:10
2
KUDOS
There are two ways of writing this one. The first is the use of the command subjunctive form. In the command subjunctive, you have to have a mandatory element (such as requires here) and a connector ‘that’ and finally a basic or command form of the verb (make here)

The construction of such a sentence here will be
Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires (mandatory element) that (the connector word) anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company's stock make (the command verb) a public disclosure of the purchase

The other way of writing this is straight and simple. In the second case, you have to use an infinitive verbal and be done with.

For example, when the above sentence is re- written with the infinitive --- Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company's stock ‘to make’ (the use of infinitive verbal) public disclosure of the purchase. But don’t skip the ‘to’ for any reason at least the first time

In the given example, Chocie C is correct.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 112
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 15

Re: section 13 d 3 of the securities exchange act of 1934 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2012, 07:24
malkov wrote:
Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires anyone who buys more than 5 percent of a company's stock make a public disclosure of the purchase.

A. make
B. will also make
C. to make
D. must make
E. must then make

What do you think? Shall we use the rule of Expressions that are followed by a Verb Word (the infinite w/o the TO) here? (ask, demand, require, desire and etc.)

+1 for C.
Read it like this:--> "Section 13(d)..............requires anyone ........to make a ....".
Intern
Joined: 05 May 2012
Posts: 15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 17

Re: section 13 d 3 of the securities exchange act of 1934 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2012, 09:17
Thank you, daagh, it's clear. The OA is C.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10332
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2014, 03:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   [#permalink] 10 Jul 2014, 03:19
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Because the city's files covered only the years 1934 through 2002 2 13 Mar 2017, 09:21
12 High-ranking Security Officials 10 04 Oct 2016, 07:33
4 On account of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) doc 4 09 Nov 2015, 22:00
1 exchange with vs. exchange for 2 26 Apr 2016, 23:52
7 Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 12 03 Jul 2016, 19:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.