GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Jan 2019, 07:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 92
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Re: Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2018, 00:52
jerrywu wrote:
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(A) by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose
(B) by the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing
(D) to the United States government's satisfaction, impose
(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing


Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to do ‘X’, ‘Y’ and ‘Z’

A - INCORRECT

1) ‘X’ and ‘Y’ use the active construction whereas ‘Z’ uses passive construction
2) Parallelism issue: to single| begin | to impose
3) ‘By’ – incorrect idiom

B - INCORRECT

1) By – incorrect idiom

C - INCORRECT

1) ‘X’ and ‘Y’ use the active construction whereas ‘Z’ uses passive construction
2) Parallelism issue: to single| begin | imposing

D – CORRECT

This uses the correct active form and more importantly uses the correct parallel structure
To (single| begin | impose)

E – INCORRECT

1) Parallelism issue: to single| begin | imposing
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Posts: 96
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2018, 17:25
EducationAisle Thanks for the clarification!
_________________

1. Well Begun is Half done
2. He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.
3. The night is darkest just before the dawn

Director
Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 569
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2018, 21:15
jerrywu wrote:
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government's being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

(C) with the United States government's being satisfied, imposing

(E) to the United States government's satisfaction, imposing


HI GMATNinja, mikemcgarry, egmat, DmitryFarber, MagooshExpert (Carolyn), ccooley, GMATGuruNY, EMPOWERgmatVerbal , EducationAisle

Can we eliminate the above two options based on the meaning that imposing -ing verb referring to the preceding clause and subject of that clause?

So here imposing refers to negotiations and negotiations cannot impose sanctions.

I know there is parallelism issue but I want to know is my above reason valid?
_________________

आत्मनॊ मोक्षार्थम् जगद्धिताय च

Resource: GMATPrep RCs With Solution

Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1375
Re: Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2018, 10:52
NandishSS I wouldn't read it that way. It's hard to say exactly what a sentence means when it's wrong, but we should use the overall structure. We need "impose" to be parallel with "single out" and "begin." These are the actions that the OTCA enables. The "if" part is a modifier for the verb "impose," and not the other way around.
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

VP
VP
User avatar
P
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1066
Location: India
GPA: 3.31
Re: Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2019, 07:22
Hi NandishSS, you seem to be suggesting that negotiations is the subject of the preceding clause. Actually the subject of the preceding clause is Section 301 (and not negotiations).

Nevertheless, we cannot interpret it in this manner for multiple reasons.

1) The structure you are referring to is:

Clause, present participial phrase.

For example: India won all the league matches, reaching the finals.

In this case however, the presence of and (and, if the negotiations…) precludes the possibility of interpreting C and E in the manner you have suggested.

2) In C and E, the barebones structure of the sentence is:

Section 301 enables United States to single out…, begin…, and imposing…

It is very clear that imposing is not parallel with single and begin.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness &nbs [#permalink] 04 Jan 2019, 07:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.