It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 18:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 0

Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2006, 23:20
1
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:00) correct 31% (01:02) wrong based on 1200 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected the Hudson River at Albany to the Great Lakes at Buffalo, providing the port of New York City with a direct water link to the heartland of the North American continent.

(A) Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

(B) Seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

(C) It was seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, and ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, but the Erie Canal, connecting

(D) The Erie Canal was seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep and it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, which connected

(E) The Erie Canal, seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, connecting

Official Guide 12 Question

 Question: 44 Page: 42 Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: City
Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2006, 23:33
E.The Erie Canal, seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, connecting

Go for E, since the sentence after the comma clearly refers to the Erie Canal. There is also parallelism with the gerungs (ing) - running / connecting / providing

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 203 [1], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2006, 23:34
1
KUDOS
lfox2 wrote:
E.The Erie Canal, seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, connecting

Go for E, since the sentence after the comma clearly refers to the Erie Canal. There is also parallelism with the gerungs (ing) - running / connecting / providing

If you select E, where is your verb ?

_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Last edited by Swagatalakshmi on 27 Nov 2006, 23:37, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 203 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 532

Kudos [?]: 162 [0], given: 1

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2006, 00:08
I'd have to go with A. Is their a hard and fast rule against a pronoun preceding its antecedent?
Quote:
Seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep
is a problem for me.
Does anyone have an OA?

Kudos [?]: 162 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 432

Kudos [?]: 30 [2], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2006, 00:21
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Seldom more that 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected the Hudson River at Albany to the Great Lakes at Buffalo, providing the port of New York City with a direct water link to the heartland of the North American continent.

A.Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

Wrong modifier

B.Seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

Modifier placed correctly. This modifies Erie Canal

C.It was seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, and ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, but the Erie Canal, connecting

'It' has no reference

D.The Erie Canal was seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep and it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, which connected

here which refers to New York and it certainly didn't connect river to lake.

E.The Erie Canal, seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, connecting

Awkward, no verb.....

B is correct!

Kudos [?]: 30 [2], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 734

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2006, 09:48
B is parallel and sounds better.

A.Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

B.Seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

C.It was seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, and ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, but the Erie Canal, connecting - STRANGE

D.The Erie Canal was seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep and it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, which connected

E.The Erie Canal, seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, connecting

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2007, 02:29
one more vote for B

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2007, 03:18
Seldom more that 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected the Hudson River at Albany to the Great Lakes at Buffalo, providing the port of New York City with a direct water link to the heartland of the North American continent.

A. Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected
B. Seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected
C. It was seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, and ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, but the Erie Canal, connecting
D. The Erie Canal was seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep and it ran 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, which connected
E. The Erie Canal, seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, connecting

Between D & E

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2007, 11:26
but a question ?
Seldom more than 40 feet wide [u][b]or[/b][/u] 12 feet deep but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

y do we have OR between 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep . Should be ABD

~sara

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1340

Kudos [?]: 835 [0], given: 10

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2007, 11:36
saransh wrote:
but a question ?
Seldom more than 40 feet wide or 12 feet deep but running 363 miles across the rugged wilderness of upstate New York, the Erie Canal connected

y do we have OR between 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep . Should be ABD

~sara

In this SC the "and" "or" conditions are irrelevant. We are looking for a choice which is gramatically correct.

Kudos [?]: 835 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2007, 17:46
C and E can be eliminated right away because of (due to?) the word Connecting.
D is misplaced modifier.
Between A and B, A has misplaced pronoun "IT"
Answer is B according to me.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 72 [1], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2007, 22:07
1
KUDOS
OA is B.

Kudos [?]: 72 [1], given: 0

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4986

Kudos [?]: 5507 [1], given: 112

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 07:14
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
A) gives run on sentences,' Seldom more ...., but it ....., the Erie Canal connected....
B) corrects the problem and is the best ans avail
C) same as A too many run on sentences
D) which is misplaced
E) same as A too many run on sentences
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Kudos [?]: 5507 [1], given: 112

Manager
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 2

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 20:46
Guys B and D does not make sense because of 'OR' width and depth should be supported by AND.

Picking 'A' because C and E connecting seems odd.

OA??

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 14 May 2009
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 29

Schools: AGSM '16
Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2009, 04:23
I'm inclined to go with B: proper choice of words and flows in good order.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 29

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2009, 05:04
I'm inclined to go with B: proper choice of words and flows in good order.

Seldom more that 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep,
How can 'and' be changed to 'or' isn't wrong ?

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 5

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2009, 10:28
IMO A

Modifier, co ordinating conjunction + main clause, subject & main clause,participial modifier.
I think option A conveys the meaning correctly and it is not a run on sentence.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2010, 20:08
I think E since it maintains the parallelism between the verbs running /connecting/providing and also clears up the case for matching the pronoun with the antecedant which is missing in the other choices

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 416

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 112

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2010, 05:13
I will go with B ..
OA - B ... The question has already been discussed in the forum

erie-canal-98758.html?hilit=seldom%20more%20than%2040%20feet#p760977

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 112

Manager
Status: Mesmerized
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 174

Kudos [?]: 127 [1], given: 12

Location: UAE, Dubai
Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 06:03
1
KUDOS
this question is from OG, but there is an editing error in it, option B should be (40 feet wide AND 12 feet deep) if you look at the answer explanation you'll see B written with AND.
_________________

Nanquam Fractum

Kudos [?]: 127 [1], given: 12

Re: Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2010, 06:03

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 75 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Seldom more than 40 feet wide and 12 feet deep, but it ran 363 miles a

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.