It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 00:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 100 [1], given: 94

Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.73
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2015, 12:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (01:36) correct 35% (01:39) wrong based on 324 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The following is an excerpt from a campaign speech.

Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increased taxes to fund programs that help the long-term unemployed of the state. Such action would address an immediate symptom for a select group, without doing much to address the overall problems we all face. Only through lowering taxes can we stimulate the growth of small businesses, which will revitalize the state's whole economy. That, in turn, will result in greater prosperity and in more jobs, including jobs for those who have been unemployed for a while. Through lowering taxes, everyone wins, and those currently unemployed get the best help the economy can provide --- a real job.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.

B) The first is evidence supporting the main argument; the second is the main conclusion.

C) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.

D) The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.

E) The first is a conclusion drawn by Senator Baker's opponent; the second is Senator Baker's main conclusion.

Kudos.. Kudos Kudos for a BOLDFACE

Merged topics
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by sallysea on 19 Mar 2017, 17:42, edited 3 times in total.
Boldfaced relevant part

Kudos [?]: 100 [1], given: 94

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1271

Kudos [?]: 2386 [0], given: 178

Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2015, 12:54
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increased taxes to fund programs that help the long-term unemployed of the state. Such action would address an immediate symptom for a select group, without doing much to address the overall problems we all face. Only through lowering taxes can we stimulate the growth of small businesses, which will revitalize the state's whole economy. That, in turn, will result in greater prosperity and in more jobs, including jobs for those who have been unemployed for a while. Through lowering taxes, everyone wins, and those currently unemployed get the best help the economy can provide --- a real job.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
B) The first is evidence supporting the main argument; the second is the main conclusion.
C) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.
D) The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.
E) The first is a conclusion drawn by Senator Baker's opponent; the second is Senator Baker's main conclusion.
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Kudos [?]: 2386 [0], given: 178

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 13

Premium Member
Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2015, 06:06
Hi mikemcgarry

could you please provide your comments for part 1 in option A

The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes

where we are opposing this prediction in argument.

Please clarify

Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 13

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3102

Kudos [?]: 1116 [0], given: 327

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2016, 01:00
Video explanation of the question provided by Magoosh -

http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3117/ ... xplanation

Hope this helps ....
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1116 [0], given: 327

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2015
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 366

Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2016, 23:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi ashutoshsh,

The option D states: The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.

While you might be right that the first boldface statement is an objection but it is not something that argument rejects. It is something that the argument states. The Senator states that: Such action would address an immediate symptom for a select group, without doing much to address the overall problems we all face. He clearly states the flaws in the opponents plan and then goes on to state his plan, that if implemented will address the issue that the state is facing.

That is how I rejected the option D. Hope it helped!

PS: I have not gone through the video explanation. I am not sure if the same thing has been mentioned there.

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 366

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 64

GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 580 Q38 V31
GMAT 3: 660 Q44 V38
Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 23:19
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Correct. Baker opposes the conclusion he draws from his candidates proposal. Then has an intermediate conclusion supporting the main conclusion

B) The first is evidence supporting the main argument; the second is the main conclusion.
The first statement does not support the argument.

C) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.
The first statement does not support the conclusion of the argument.

D) The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.
The first statement is not an objection, but rather a conclusion drawn from Rothmore's plan

E) The first is a conclusion drawn by Senator Baker's opponent; the second is Senator Baker's main conclusion.
The first statement is a conclusion drawn by Baker, not Rothmore

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 64

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 52 [2], given: 264

Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 23:27
2
This post received
KUDOS
Candidate Rothmore make a recommendation that the argument by Senator Baker opposes through predicting that it can only help a small group. The last line of the argument is main conclusion second last line is also a conclusion drawn supporting main conclusion so A it is
dav90 wrote:
tia2112 wrote:
The following is an excerpt from a campaign speech.

Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increased taxes to fund programs that help the long-term unemployed of the state. Such action would address an immediate symptom for a select group, without doing much to address the overall problems we all face. Only through lowering taxes can we stimulate the growth of small businesses, which will revitalize the state's whole economy. That, in turn, will result in greater prosperity and in more jobs, including jobs for those who have been unemployed for a while. Through lowering taxes, everyone wins, and those currently unemployed get the best help the economy can provide --- a real job.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.

B) The first is evidence supporting the main argument; the second is the main conclusion.

C) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.

D) The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.

E) The first is a conclusion drawn by Senator Baker's opponent; the second is Senator Baker's main conclusion.

Kudos.. Kudos Kudos for a BOLDFACE



I doubt OA.
1st statement is not opposing anything

_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Kudos [?]: 52 [2], given: 264

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1242

Kudos [?]: 1297 [0], given: 434

Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2017, 06:11
tia2112 wrote:
The following is an excerpt from a campaign speech.

Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increased taxes to fund programs that help the long-term unemployed of the state. Such action would address an immediate symptom for a select group, without doing much to address the overall problems we all face. Only through lowering taxes can we stimulate the growth of small businesses, which will revitalize the state's whole economy. That, in turn, will result in greater prosperity and in more jobs, including jobs for those who have been unemployed for a while. Through lowering taxes, everyone wins, and those currently unemployed get the best help the economy can provide --- a real job.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.

B) The first is evidence supporting the main argument; the second is the main conclusion.

C) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is the main conclusion.

D) The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.

E) The first is a conclusion drawn by Senator Baker's opponent; the second is Senator Baker's main conclusion.


OFFICIAL SOLUTION



The first bold statement is a gloomy prediction about what would happen under the opponent's (Candidate Rothmore's) plan. The second bold statement is a prediction about what would follow from Senator Baker's own plan. Both are predictions: the speaker oppose the first and valorizes the second. Baker's main conclusion is in the final sentence, not part of the bold text.

The credited answer is (A): The first is a prediction about Rothmore's plan, which Baker opposes. The second cited as a consequence of Baker's own plan, which in turn supports the main conclusion.
(B) is wrong: neither of the boldface sections could be called evidence.
(C) is wrong because the first bold statement does not support the main conclusion in any way. Also, the second bold statement, by itself, is not the main conclusion.
(D) is wrong because the first bold statement is not an objection.
(E) is tricky: technically, the first bold statement is probably not what Rothmore would conclude on his own. It's how Baker is characterizing (probably mischaracterizing) Rothmore's position. Opposing political candidates rare present each other's positions in a totally objected and even-handed manner. Also, the second bold statement, by itself, is not the main conclusion.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Kudos [?]: 1297 [0], given: 434

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 100

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 113

Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GPA: 3.59
Reviews Badge
Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2017, 01:16
powellmittra wrote:
Hi ashutoshsh,

The option D states: The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.

While you might be right that the first boldface statement is an objection but it is not something that argument rejects. It is something that the argument states. The Senator states that: Such action would address an immediate symptom for a select group, without doing much to address the overall problems we all face. He clearly states the flaws in the opponents plan and then goes on to state his plan, that if implemented will address the issue that the state is facing.

That is how I rejected the option D. Hope it helped!

PS: I have not gone through the video explanation. I am not sure if the same thing has been mentioned there.


thanks for this wonderful explanation. I also choose option D

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 113

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 199

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 30

Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2017, 05:07
hi mikemcgarry

Answer D confuses me a lot

D) The first is an objection that the main argument rejects; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusions of the argument.

this is my interpretation of answer choice D as following
first boldface is objection, and this objection is not what Senator Baker agrees.

as prompt, Senator Baker does disagree with the first boldface, so I view first boldface as objection
while, the OA states "(D) is wrong because the first bold statement is not an objection"

Would you please clarify.

Thanks in advance

Zoe

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 30

Re: Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas   [#permalink] 01 Sep 2017, 05:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.