It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 20:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1512

Kudos [?]: 1008 [0], given: 1

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2007, 03:28
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty

(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required

(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance

(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action

(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete

Kudos [?]: 1008 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2007, 05:16
tarek99 wrote:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty

(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required

(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance

(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action

(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete

On second thoughts I find 'D' better. hence 'D' will be my choice

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2007, 19:39
I chose answer choice D as well.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1079

Kudos [?]: 679 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2007, 03:11
If each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action, the fixed date could be put off....so A seems correct. D doesn't seem right because the activity could also be simoultaneous

OA???

Kudos [?]: 679 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 116

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2007, 04:19
Since action of each country is conditional on simultaneous actions by other countries, it creates a dependency cycle. Each country can avoid an action due to this condition. Hence, each country will have an excuse for its lack of compliance.
I go for C.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2007, 08:34
I also like "C"..
"A" does not seem correct. We have "fixed dates", meaning that it has already been decided on the them.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2007, 09:32
tarek99 wrote:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that

(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty- The date is fixed. No mention of postponement

(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required-No metion of preferential treatment to one country
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance- There is no indiaction of excuse

(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action-here lies the problem. How can you notify and do the action at the same time-Correct answer
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete- Starting date and simultaneous action is specified. No discussion on how long the action is to complete the requirements of the treatyPlease explain your answer

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2007, 09:35
Since action of each country is conditional on simultaneous actions by other countries, it creates a dependency cycle. Each country can avoid an action due to this condition. Hence, each country will have an excuse for its lack of compliance.
I go for C.

I did not pick C because it is stated that the date is fixed. and the same logic applies for A

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

27 Dec 2007, 09:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by