Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 27 May 2017, 11:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 318
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 1000 [0], given: 18

Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2012, 15:16
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (01:11) correct 38% (00:21) wrong based on 29 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in
the press reports.

A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them



This question has been discussed many times, but most people just say why the OA is right.
So I am wondering why b and c are wrong although I picked a as an answer.

I am guessing...
"spoke" is obvously past tense, but b is future and c is present.
Is it correct to say that the reason b and c are wrong is the inconsistent tense?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 172
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.69
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 13

Re: GWD #2 V 29 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2012, 15:31
I can't provide a full explanation, maybe an Expert can explain it better but I think i can't point you in the write direction maybe. The sentence is using a subjunctive mood (subject is expressing a wish), and when that happens the problem tense of "to be" is "be" rather than "will not be" or "are."

http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000031.htm
Re: GWD #2 V 29   [#permalink] 08 Apr 2012, 15:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Several senior officials spoke to the press on condi-tion ananthpatri 6 11 Sep 2012, 16:05
3 Several senior officers spoke to the press on the condition amritgodofwar 11 26 May 2016, 11:47
11 Several senior officials spoke to the press on condition whichscore 5 06 Jan 2017, 07:35
27 Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition riteshbindal 11 24 Sep 2016, 08:21
8 Several senior officials spoke to the press on condition ashishd 18 16 Feb 2016, 05:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.