It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 20:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Several of a certain bank s top executives have recently

Author Message
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Several of a certain bank s top executives have recently [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2005, 19:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Several of a certain bankâ€™s top executives have recently been purchasing shares in their own bank. This activity has occasioned some surprise, since it is widely believed that the bank, carrying a large number of bad loans, is on the brink of collapse. Since the executives are well placed to know their bankâ€™s true condition, it might seem that their share purchases show that the danger of collapse is exaggerated. However, the available information about the bankâ€™s condition is from reliable and informed sources, and corporate executives do sometimes buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to calm worries about their companyâ€™s condition. On balance, therefore, it is likely that the executives of the bank are following this example.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue that the argument addresses; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.

B. The first describes the circumstance the explanation of which is the issue the argument addresses; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument.

C. The first provides evidence to defend the position that the argument seeks to establish against opposing positions; the second states the main conclusion of the argument.

D. The first provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second states a conclusion that is drawn in order to support the argumentâ€™s main conclusion.

E. Each provides evidence to support the position that the argument seeks to establish.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2005, 19:20
B. second bf is not a conclusion in support of a main conclusion
C. first bf is not an evidence
D. same as B
E. second bf is a conclusion

A is best. The first bf describes a circumstance (employees buying up shares) and the explanation of this phenomena is described in the main body (either false alarm or buying up shares to give false impression). The second bf is the main conclusion (must be creating false impression)

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 206

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2005, 19:36
A for me.

The second BF is the main conclusion: B, D and E out.
This question has only one position. --> C out.

A remains: the best choice

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

23 Nov 2005, 19:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Several of a certain bank s top executives have recently

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.