Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 03:57 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 03:57

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 4556 [14]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 4556 [2]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 215
Own Kudos [?]: 180 [1]
Given Kudos: 218
Location: Fiji
Schools: IE
GPA: 1
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Several people came down with an illness caused by a type of bacteria [#permalink]
I don’t agree with the answer here. I believe the answer is C. If the sauce used on the seafood was the reason everyone was sick, then that would clearly explain why the seafood was the cause of the sickness for the people who did not come into contact with the bacteria. E is vague, it doesn’t explain anything.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Posts: 220
Own Kudos [?]: 151 [0]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE:Account Management (Other)
Send PM
Re: Several people came down with an illness caused by a type of bacteria [#permalink]
Hi cmccray26,
There are two sides to the argument at hand: Health officials & Test reports.
Both have their respective claims.
Health officials: Seafood (in-general/all) served was contaminated.
Test reports: Most people who ate seafood at the restaurant on that date had not come in contact with the bacteria in question.
Question stem asks us to find an option that helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy as much as possible.

(C) All and only those who ate contaminated seafood at the restaurant on that date were allergic to the monosodium glutamate in a sauce that they used.
This proves Health officials point to an extent but does nothing to test reports. Plus, what about the people who ate contaminated food but were not allergic to glutamate? second part also weakens the health official's claim.

(E) All and only those who ate a particular seafood dish at the restaurant contracted the illness.
This strengthens both claims and clears the air. Only some got sick and the ordered a particular sea food, which was contaminated.

Hope that helps.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 480 Q34 V22
GMAT 2: 540 Q33 V31
GMAT 3: 620 Q42 V34
GPA: 3.6
WE:Other (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Several people came down with an illness caused by a type of bacteria [#permalink]
Doer01 wrote:
Hi cmccray26,
There are two sides to the argument at hand: Health officials & Test reports.
Both have their respective claims.
Health officials: Seafood (in-general/all) served was contaminated.
Test reports: Most people who ate seafood at the restaurant on that date had not come in contact with the bacteria in question.
Question stem asks us to find an option that helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy as much as possible.

(C) All and only those who ate contaminated seafood at the restaurant on that date were allergic to the monosodium glutamate in a sauce that they used.
This proves Health officials point to an extent but does nothing to test reports. Plus, what about the people who ate contaminated food but were not allergic to glutamate? second part also weakens the health official's claim.

(E) All and only those who ate a particular seafood dish at the restaurant contracted the illness.
This strengthens both claims and clears the air. Only some got sick and the ordered a particular sea food, which was contaminated.

Hope that helps.


I was stuck between D & E and decided to go with E.

However, can anyone help me with why D is wrong ?

Best regards,
Babar28
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2019
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 42 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GRE 1: Q168 V155
GPA: 3.27
WE:Web Design (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Several people came down with an illness caused by a type of bacteria [#permalink]
Babar28 wrote:
Doer01 wrote:
Hi cmccray26,
There are two sides to the argument at hand: Health officials & Test reports.
Both have their respective claims.
Health officials: Seafood (in-general/all) served was contaminated.
Test reports: Most people who ate seafood at the restaurant on that date had not come in contact with the bacteria in question.
Question stem asks us to find an option that helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy as much as possible.

(C) All and only those who ate contaminated seafood at the restaurant on that date were allergic to the monosodium glutamate in a sauce that they used.
This proves Health officials point to an extent but does nothing to test reports. Plus, what about the people who ate contaminated food but were not allergic to glutamate? second part also weakens the health official's claim.

(E) All and only those who ate a particular seafood dish at the restaurant contracted the illness.
This strengthens both claims and clears the air. Only some got sick and the ordered a particular sea food, which was contaminated.

Hope that helps.


I was stuck between D & E and decided to go with E.

However, can anyone help me with why D is wrong ?

Best regards,
Babar28


Paradox here is that only a specific group of customer came in contact of the bacteria and not all the customers of the restaurant.
Option D doesn't resolve that paradox.
"The restaurant in question had recently been given a warning about violations of health regulations."
Surely option D gives some indication that restaurant could be the place where they got the bacteria but doesn't explain why only few people came in contact, whereas option E helps us to resolve the paradox.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17210
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Several people came down with an illness caused by a type of bacteria [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Several people came down with an illness caused by a type of bacteria [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne