It is currently 20 Sep 2017, 17:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Shell game - watch it!

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 958

Kudos [?]: 883 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 11:24
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

71% (01:08) correct 29% (01:29) wrong based on 203 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I couldn't find very helpful answers. So reopening the question! Will appreciate if you will provide reasoning along with the answers.

Newspaper editorial:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
* Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
* Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
* The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
* Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
* The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

Kudos [?]: 883 [0], given: 36

Senior Manager
Status: Current Student
Joined: 14 Oct 2009
Posts: 371

Kudos [?]: 122 [1], given: 53

Schools: Chicago Booth 2013, Ross, Duke , Kellogg , Stanford, Haas
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 15:58
1
KUDOS
I would say C. If the group of people signing up for these courses were already less likely to commit crimes after being released, then the argument that removing these courses will cause more crime afterward falls apart. The assumption that the difference between groups comes as a result of the action and is not already there before is necessary to claim the action had any impact
_________________

Kudos [?]: 122 [1], given: 53

Manager
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 1

Location: Astoria, NYC
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 18:03
I am also leaning towards C. If the inmates who took college classes were already determined to not commit crimes when released, then its not the classes that helps establish the ultimate goal

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 7 [2], given: 9

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 19:05
2
KUDOS
nusmavrik wrote:
I couldn't find very helpful answers. So reopening the question! Will appreciate if you will provide reasoning along with the answers.

Newspaper editorial:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Conclusion : This action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
* Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed. It means taking college-level courses while in prison deters one from committing crime, which does support the conclusion. We can keep this aside while we go over the other options.
* Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population. Out of scope
* The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. This means that the group was as likely to commit the crimes as the others who had not taken the courses. This contradicts the conclusion as the argument tells us that the inmates who actually took the courses committed far fewer crimes
* Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does. Out of scope
* The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.Out of scope

The words(anyone etc) in A are strong and look a little extreme and thus act as a red herring. However, going over the other options does show us that A is indeed correct(hope it is ).

IMO A.

Hope it helps,
meshtrap

Kudos [?]: 7 [2], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 262

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 19:25
IMO A. Nice explaination by meshtrap
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 454 [2], given: 14

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 21:32
2
KUDOS
A is definitely wrong

f the presence/absence of college courses will NOT DETER crime, then that is essentially saying that it has no effect.
therefore, since there's no effect, this action will NOT be "counter to the governor's ultimate goal".

the argument depends upon the assumption that eliminating college-level courses will have an effect on inmates' rates of recidivism ("counter to the governor's ultimate goal"). in other words, the argument is assuming that the college-level courses CAUSE differences in the inmates' behavior.

if you're going to argue that X causes Y, one necessary precondition (assumption) is that Y DOESN'T cause X.
this is precisely what is asserted in (c), which should be the correct answer.

Kudos [?]: 454 [2], given: 14

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 958

Kudos [?]: 883 [1], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 22:18
1
KUDOS
I like the reasoning given by Michmax3 and gurpreet07. OA is C

Two ways to look at the problem :

1) The assumption that the difference between groups comes as a result of the action and is not already there before is necessary to claim the action had any impact

2) if you're going to argue that X causes Y, one necessary precondition (assumption) is that Y DOESN'T cause X. this is precisely what is asserted in (c), which should be the correct answer.

Second one is a hurricane. But I think few people will visualize this. Awesome guys Gave kudos !

Kudos [?]: 883 [1], given: 36

Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: currently in Taiwan
Schools: Top Taiwanese university
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2010, 07:48
yep, easy C...
if those who had previously took these courses were already less likely to commit other crimes, than the whole process doesn't make any sense. they didn't get converted because of the courses but the complete self-displine
it's like playing basketball. some say that taller kids are better at basketbal whereas to some its because most of the time, taller people are more inclined to play.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 13:52
C.......for me reasoning on the lines as gurpreet07

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 462

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 24

Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2010, 09:49
It has to be C
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 24

Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 11

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2010, 20:18
C it is, tough one.

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 133

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2010, 02:53
C for me too

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1605

Kudos [?]: 581 [0], given: 36

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2011, 23:21
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 581 [0], given: 36

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1295

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 10

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2011, 23:25
An easy C.

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 10

Manager
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 2

Location: India
Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2011, 09:34
Relatively easy question..got "C" in 1:54
See explanations next to the options
nusmavrik wrote:
I couldn't find very helpful answers. So reopening the question! Will appreciate if you will provide reasoning along with the answers.

Newspaper editorial:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
* Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.This option strengthens governor's conclusion(decision) of not allowing inmates to access college-level courses, the conclusion with which argument is not in agreement.
* Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.Out of scope
* The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.It removes a condition which if true will weaken the argument, thus best choice among all.
* Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does."Effect of high school level courses??Unrelated to the argument!"
* The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime."Out of scope"

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 626

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 51

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2011, 04:57
'The assumption that the difference between groups comes as a result of the action and is not already there before is necessary to claim the action had any impact'

C hence.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 51

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 265

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 6

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2012, 06:44
Straight C.

Another example of a cause-and-effect fallacy type question.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 7

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2015, 12:32
Anyone can clearify premises and comclusion. I don't understand.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 7

Re: Shell game - watch it! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2015, 08:59
I went with C. I did not go with A because:
(A) Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
- No CL C = unlikely to stop already decided criminal.

I find this sentence quite odd. It says that no courses is unlikely to 'stop future crimes'. It doesn't say anything about if courses actually do the opposite, maybe none of the two options has any effect what so ever on future crime rates? If that's the case it is not needed to support the conclusion.
_________________

I love being wrong. An incorrect answer offers an extraordinary opportunity to improve.

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 7

Re: Shell game - watch it!   [#permalink] 30 Apr 2015, 08:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
38 Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game 23 12 Aug 2017, 20:51
Company A and Company B both produce gold watches 1 23 Apr 2016, 10:25
16 A study of children's television-watching habits by the federal depart 14 07 Mar 2017, 08:35
6 Because it was long thought that few people would watch 9 24 Jul 2017, 10:57
15 Because it was long thought that few people would watch 14 18 Jan 2017, 01:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by