It is currently 10 Dec 2017, 22:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Simultaneous Interviews

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 22

Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2010, 21:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

73% (01:06) correct 27% (01:02) wrong based on 47 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In an effort to go beyond resumes as tools in its search for executives, one leading company has resorted to interviewing the top candidates for a position all together in a single group. This technique is supposed to afford a direct comparison of the candidates with respect to some personal qualities that cannot be gleaned from a resume.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique?

A) Resumes do sometimes allow reliable inferences to be made about a candidate's personal qualities.
B) The simultaneous interview could become cumbersome if there were a great many candidates for a position.
C) The more perceptive the interviewer, the more revealing the simultaneous interviews is apt to be.
D) There are certain personal qualities that only an extended simultaneous interview can bring out.
E) The simultaneous interview distorts each candidate's response style by inducing stresses unlike any an executive position induces.

OA after discussion.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 22

Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2010, 23:41
BarneyStinson wrote:
In an effort to go beyond resumes as tools in its search for executives, one leading company has resorted to interviewing the top candidates for a position all together in a single group. This technique is supposed to afford a direct comparison of the candidates with respect to some personal qualities that cannot be gleaned from a resume.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique?
A) Resumes do sometimes allow reliable inferences to be made about a candidate's personal qualities.
This doesnt weaken the simultaneous interview but also this is talking about sometimes but not always.
B) The simultaneous interview could become cumbersome if there were a great many candidates for a position.
This doesnt tell if a large number of candidates are in the interview room, personal qualities are not revealed.
C) The more perceptive the interviewer, the more revealing the simultaneous interviews is apt to be.
This strengthers that simulataneours interviews can compare personal characteritics and to find out if a person if more perspective etc.
D) There are certain personal qualities that only an extended simultaneous interview can bring out.
This suppots the simultanerous interview
E) The simultaneous interview distorts each candidate's response style by inducing stresses unlike any an executive position induces.
Only one left is E. if the interview distorts the candidates response, then all the responses are due to stress levels and cannot find anything other than how a perform might perform under stress.
OA after discussion.

E

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2010, 03:28
I go with E too

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 5

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2754

Kudos [?]: 1923 [0], given: 235

Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2010, 05:45
I m confused between B and E

why B is wrong?
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Kudos [?]: 1923 [0], given: 235

Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 112 [1], given: 12

Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2010, 07:46
1
KUDOS
A) Resumes do sometimes allow reliable inferences to be made about a candidate's personal qualities.
>> No specifics on simultaneous interviews.
B) The simultaneous interview could become cumbersome if there were a great many candidates for a position.
>> For me this is not very convincing to doubt simultaneous interviews. This point does not mention about executive positions and so E seems more appropriate answer.
C) The more perceptive the interviewer, the more revealing the simultaneous interviews is apt to be.
>> Supportive
D) There are certain personal qualities that only an extended simultaneous interview can bring out.
>> Supportive
E) The simultaneous interview distorts each candidate's response style by inducing stresses unlike any an executive position induces.
>> Yes. This shows what is the problem with simultaneous interviews for executive positions.

Kudos [?]: 112 [1], given: 12

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2010, 09:55
BarneyStinson wrote:
In an effort to go beyond resumes as tools in its search for executives, one leading company has resorted to interviewing the top candidates for a position all together in a single group. This technique is supposed to afford a direct comparison of the candidates with respect to some personal qualities that cannot be gleaned from a resume.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique?

A) Resumes do sometimes allow reliable inferences to be made about a candidate's personal qualities.
B) The simultaneous interview could become cumbersome if there were a great many candidates for a position.
This statement casts MOST serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique
C) The more perceptive the interviewer, the more revealing the simultaneous interviews is apt to be.
Nothing to cast
D) There are certain personal qualities that only an extended simultaneous interview can bring out.
Nothing to cast
E) The simultaneous interview distorts each candidate's response style by inducing stresses unlike any an executive position induces.
This statement dont casts MOST serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique BECAUSE it's talking about Response style....DONT RELATED WITH THE STIMULUS
OA after discussion.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 5

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2754

Kudos [?]: 1923 [0], given: 235

Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2010, 23:58
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Kudos [?]: 1923 [0], given: 235

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 203 [1], given: 22

Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2010, 17:21
1
KUDOS
OA is E and good explanation by Mads, kudos from me!!!
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Kudos [?]: 203 [1], given: 22

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1469

Kudos [?]: 801 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2010, 09:33
My pick is (E) too.

In an effort to go beyond resumes as tools in its search for executives, one leading company has resorted to interviewing the top candidates for a position all together in a single group. This technique is supposed to afford a direct comparison of the candidates with respect to some personal qualities that cannot be gleaned from a resume.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the value of the simultaneous interview technique?

A) Resumes do sometimes allow reliable inferences to be made about a candidate's personal qualities.
>>> we are taking about the value of simultaneous interviews
B) The simultaneous interview could become cumbersome if there were a great many candidates for a position.
>>> no where mentioned in the premised as to how many in a group can make simultaneous interview cumbersome
C) The more perceptive the interviewer, the more revealing the simultaneous interviews is apt to be.
>>> supports simultaneous interview
D) There are certain personal qualities that only an extended simultaneous interview can bring out.
>>> supports simultaneous interview
E) The simultaneous interview distorts each candidate's response style by inducing stresses unlike any an executive position induces.
>>> simultaneous interview falsifies each candidate's response style which will not give a correct picture of candidate's personal qualities.

Kudos [?]: 801 [0], given: 6

Re: Simultaneous Interviews   [#permalink] 11 Mar 2010, 09:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Simultaneous Interviews

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.