Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 03:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Since it has become known that several of a bank's top

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 37

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 00:25
Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however,
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

I think

Conclusion : Those worrisome rumours must be false .

Questioning the conclusion : Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic.

Reasoning the Questioning of the conclusion : since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

Hence A is the answer
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 147
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 17

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's ' top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 22:11
I'm sorry but why is the second bold faced not a conclusion?

I picked B because I believe it is a conclusion.

The OG says "the second statement is not offered as a conclusion - no evidence is given for it; rather it is the evidence for something else"

I'm trying to understand the full context of this sentence and am I hold true that for a statement to be a conclusion, there has to be evidence to support it?

I guess looking back at the statement, there is nothing additional that supports it, it is just a statement of fact.

If this is the case, what in bloody hell is the conclusion then?
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 765 [0], given: 322

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 11:01
Folks,

People are accepting that conclusion is :Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic
Then how A,B,C could be answers.

Plz anyone can elaborate reasoning behind A if the above mentioned is the conclusion.

Rgds,
Saurabh
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Last edited by TGC on 15 Jan 2013, 11:12, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 765 [0], given: 322

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 11:11
After giving two more minutes to this beautiful argument , here is my reasoning

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.

If X is true,Y MUST Be False. (X is premise here and Y is conclusion)

Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

Reasoning MIGHT Well be OverOptimistic. (Well I consider it to be a author's belief and not the conclusion)

(A) justifies the above reasoning.

Plz correct me if I am going to unrelated area.

Rgds,
Saurabh
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7370
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2285

Kudos [?]: 15093 [0], given: 224

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 20:18
targetgmatchotu wrote:
Folks,

People are accepting that conclusion is :Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic
Then how A,B,C could be answers.

Plz anyone can elaborate reasoning behind A if the above mentioned is the conclusion.

Rgds,
Saurabh

There are two different conclusions here:

A conclusion: Depositors are relieved - belief of people in general
The argument gives the reasons they are relieved.

Main conclusion of the argument - this is the author's belief - 'Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic'
The author gives the reasons why this reasoning may be overoptimisitic.

(A) states 'The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion'
It doesn't say that it supports the 'main conclusion'.

(C) says that 'The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument'
This is certainly incorrect.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Current Student Joined: 06 Sep 2013 Posts: 2005 Concentration: Finance Followers: 68 Kudos [?]: 643 [15] , given: 355 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 08 Dec 2013, 15:42 15 This post received KUDOS 7 This post was BOOKMARKED betterscore wrote: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles? (A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. (B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument. (C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion. (D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. (E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. Let’s begin dissecting. The conclusion is ‘Such reasoning might be overoptimistic’. So the second boldface is actually the premise. Now I’m not 100% sure what the first boldface is. But I’m pretty sure that the second one is the premise. So let’s start eliminating answer choices that say otherwise. ‘B’ says that the second is a conclusion. This is clearly not the case. ‘C’ also says that the second boldface is a conclusion, when we have already identified it as a premise. ‘D’ says that the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. This sounds as if it were the conclusion too. So this doesn’t fit the bill either. Now ‘E’ says that the second provides evidence in support. This sounds like a premise so I’ll keep it. Now between ‘A’ and ‘E’ we will have to check what the first boldface might mean. ‘A’ says that the first bold is ‘a premise that supports A conclusion’. Not necessarily the ‘main conclusion’, whilst ‘E’ is saying that it is A conclusion, not a premise. The first boldface is clearly a premise. They have been relieved, why? Because executives have been buying shares. So ‘A’ is the correct answer. This question is in fact very difficult because it is based on your ability to distinguish among premises and conclusion. Note that the stimulus contains all of these: counterpremise, counterconclusion, premise and conclusion. By using the ‘why’ technique we can easily differentiate between premises and conclusions. Another key takeaway is to be aware of the phrase ‘A conclusion’ and be able to consider that there may be more than one conclusion in a stimulus. Hope it helps Cheers! J Intern Joined: 24 May 2013 Posts: 29 Concentration: Operations, General Management WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities) Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 16 Apr 2014, 06:42 OA? What is the official answer? A? Why not B? Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7370 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2285 Kudos [?]: 15093 [0], given: 224 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 16 Apr 2014, 19:04 nidhi12 wrote: OA? What is the official answer? A? Why not B? The OA is A. B is incorrect because the second boldface is not the main conclusion of the argument. the main conclusion of the argument is "Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic" Conclusions are not facts; they are opinions of the author. The second boldface is a premise, a fact given to you. It is not the author's opinion and hence not the conclusion. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 7

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2014, 13:06
1
KUDOS
To e-gmat

As per session given by Chiranjeev, something that author believes i.e his opinion can be regarded as intermediate conclusion.
Here in the correct choice - A, the first boldface is taken as a conclusion.
I actually scoped it out because of the reason given above.
Also, Why E is wrong here.
Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Location: India
GMAT Date: 09-19-2014
GPA: 3.8
WE: Design (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 5

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2014, 21:34
I am Never Good at these type of CR. Please help me with some Document on these.

I marked (D) and Guess I was completely wrong with this one.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7370
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2285

Kudos [?]: 15093 [0], given: 224

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2014, 20:34
karna2129 wrote:
I am Never Good at these type of CR. Please help me with some Document on these.

I marked (D) and Guess I was completely wrong with this one.

I assume you are having trouble with bold face questions. Here are a couple of posts on these that might help you:

http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2013/03 ... -the-gmat/
http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/01 ... questions/

For the solution of this question, check: since-it-has-become-known-that-several-of-a-bank-s-top-136001.html#p1112808
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews e-GMAT Representative Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Posts: 2022 Followers: 2212 Kudos [?]: 7742 [0], given: 291 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 07 Jul 2014, 22:00 rajgurinder wrote: To e-gmat As per session given by Chiranjeev, something that author believes i.e his opinion can be regarded as intermediate conclusion. Here in the correct choice - A, the first boldface is taken as a conclusion. I actually scoped it out because of the reason given above. Also, Why E is wrong here. Hi Gurinder Thanks for writing to us. Before we go on to discussing the correct answer choice, I would like to request you to share your passage analysis with us. Accordingly, please identify each statement as a fact or an opinion and the role played by the boldface portions with respect to the main conclusion of the argument. Also, please share your understanding of answer choices A and E. I would specifically want you to reconsider option A. Does it describe first boldface portion as a conclusion? Or does choice A call the first boldface as evidence? (A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. Your analysis would help me in not only addressing this particular doubt but also any possible gaps in your conceptual understanding. Hope you’ll appreciate the same. Thanks! Dolly _________________ | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com Intern Joined: 12 Feb 2013 Posts: 20 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 7 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 Jul 2014, 09:22 1 This post received KUDOS Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health. My analysis please correct if i am wrong:- A circumstance is something that is happening currently. several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank - FACT/Circumstance the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. - A circumstance Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic - Conclusion Corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health - Evidence/Fact supporting a conclusion Options:- A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. As per session given by Chiranjeev, something that author believes i.e his opinion can be regarded as intermediate conclusion. Here in the correct choice - A, the first boldface is taken as a conclusion. (E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. Here the argument is explaining why the FIRST BOLDFACE happens, in SECOND BOLDFACE he provides evidence for the explaining that argument seeks to establish(conclusion) e-GMAT Representative Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Posts: 2022 Followers: 2212 Kudos [?]: 7742 [0], given: 291 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 16 Jul 2014, 02:44 Expert's post 1 This post was BOOKMARKED rajgurinder wrote: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health. My analysis please correct if i am wrong:- A circumstance is something that is happening currently. several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank - FACT/Circumstance the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. - A circumstance Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic - Conclusion Corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health - Evidence/Fact supporting a conclusion Hi Gurinder Thanks for your response! Your analysis of the statements is quite correct; however, you haven’t presented your analysis for the following statement: “They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.” Also, is a circumstance always something that is happening currently or can it also be a set of facts that are not time bound? "Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic" – This is the main conclusion of the argument. Quote: Options:- A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. As per session given by Chiranjeev, something that author believes i.e his opinion can be regarded as intermediate conclusion. Here in the correct choice - A, the first boldface is taken as a conclusion. As I mentioned in my previous comment, I would want you to reconsider option A. Does it describe first boldface portion as a conclusion? Or does choice A call the first boldface as evidence? (A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support. You have not understood option A correctly. BF is stated as evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion. In other words, BF is evidence that supports something. What is this something? It is a conclusion. Now is this conclusion the author’s conclusion? To determine the same, you need to define the role of the statement that you have missed in your analysis. Accordingly, please decide whether the conclusion presented in the highlighted portion is by the author or the bank depositors: They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Second thing, in BF questions is there a difference between a conclusion and the conclusion? Can’t a third party make “a” conclusion in such arguments? Accordingly, the conclusion highlighted above is an intermediate conclusion by the author or “a” conclusion made by a third party? Quote: (E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. Here the argument is explaining why the FIRST BOLDFACE happens, in SECOND BOLDFACE he provides evidence for the explaining that argument seeks to establish(conclusion) Let me ask you a question here. Is the purpose of the argument to explain why the bank depositor’s act in a certain way or is to call in question the reason for their behaviour? Look at the main conclusion again and decide over this. Please do let me know what you think. Dolly _________________ | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com Manager Status: PLAY HARD OR GO HOME Joined: 25 Feb 2014 Posts: 179 Location: India Concentration: General Management, Finance Schools: Mannheim GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V22 GPA: 3.1 Followers: 3 Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 623 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 07 Aug 2014, 03:16 nidhi12 wrote: OA? What is the official answer? A? Why not B? Its clearly A.. the second statement is not a conclusion at all..the main conclusion is the one that tells us about the optimism..the second statement is infact a fact or a reason that supports the main conclusion.. hope that helps _________________ ITS NOT OVER , UNTIL I WIN ! I CAN, AND I WILL .PERIOD. Current Student Joined: 04 Mar 2014 Posts: 142 Location: India GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38 WE: Information Technology (Consulting) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 178 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 15 Oct 2014, 10:54 Although I did mark A,I'm finding it difficult to strike out D. I'm pretty sure during the actual thing would've marked as D and wondered where I had gone wrong with my verbal! BF1 does seem like a circumstance that the argument seeks to explain later.And BF2 is definitely an explanation for it.Why did the bankers buy shares of a bank that may fail.BF2 clearly explains that. I might be totally going wrong here though. Experts please help me out. Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7370 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2285 Kudos [?]: 15093 [0], given: 224 Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink] ### Show Tags 15 Oct 2014, 21:39 DebWenger wrote: Although I did mark A,I'm finding it difficult to strike out D. I'm pretty sure during the actual thing would've marked as D and wondered where I had gone wrong with my verbal! BF1 does seem like a circumstance that the argument seeks to explain later.And BF2 is definitely an explanation for it.Why did the bankers buy shares of a bank that may fail.BF2 clearly explains that. I might be totally going wrong here though. Experts please help me out. Ask yourself: What does the argument seek to establish? The author's primary concern here is "don't be too optimistic about the bank" He starts by explaining what has made people optimistic and why it may not be advisable to rely on that development and be optimistic. Now, does "several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank," describe what the argument seeks to establish? Mind you, the option has to fit exactly... "it's something like this" does not work. Every sentence in the argument is obviously related to what the author seeks to establish but the sentence must be exactly what the author actually seeks to establish (or conclusion). First bold face is not what the author seeks to establish and hence (D) is not correct. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Current Student
Joined: 04 Mar 2014
Posts: 142
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 178

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2014, 22:15
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
DebWenger wrote:
Although I did mark A,I'm finding it difficult to strike out D.
I'm pretty sure during the actual thing would've marked as D and wondered where I had gone wrong with my verbal!
BF1 does seem like a circumstance that the argument seeks to explain later.And BF2 is definitely an explanation for it.Why did the bankers buy shares of a bank that may fail.BF2 clearly explains that.
I might be totally going wrong here though.

Ask yourself: What does the argument seek to establish?
The author's primary concern here is "don't be too optimistic about the bank"
He starts by explaining what has made people optimistic and why it may not be advisable to rely on that development and be optimistic.

Now, does "several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank," describe what the argument seeks to establish? Mind you, the option has to fit exactly... "it's something like this" does not work. Every sentence in the argument is obviously related to what the author seeks to establish but the sentence must be exactly what the author actually seeks to establish (or conclusion). First bold face is not what the author seeks to establish and hence (D) is not correct.

Thanks for the explanation
Also,for the 1st BF the option "The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain","as a whole" is what should have put me of in the first place.
As a whole the argument wants to point out to the depositors ,that don't be too optimistic.Can this be the main point/conclusion of the entire argument?Would love to know your thoughts on this.
Also,is the main point of an argument in most cases the conclusion as well?
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7370
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2285

Kudos [?]: 15093 [1] , given: 224

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2014, 05:09
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
DebWenger wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
DebWenger wrote:
Although I did mark A,I'm finding it difficult to strike out D.
I'm pretty sure during the actual thing would've marked as D and wondered where I had gone wrong with my verbal!
BF1 does seem like a circumstance that the argument seeks to explain later.And BF2 is definitely an explanation for it.Why did the bankers buy shares of a bank that may fail.BF2 clearly explains that.
I might be totally going wrong here though.

Ask yourself: What does the argument seek to establish?
The author's primary concern here is "don't be too optimistic about the bank"
He starts by explaining what has made people optimistic and why it may not be advisable to rely on that development and be optimistic.

Now, does "several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank," describe what the argument seeks to establish? Mind you, the option has to fit exactly... "it's something like this" does not work. Every sentence in the argument is obviously related to what the author seeks to establish but the sentence must be exactly what the author actually seeks to establish (or conclusion). First bold face is not what the author seeks to establish and hence (D) is not correct.

Thanks for the explanation
Also,for the 1st BF the option "The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain","as a whole" is what should have put me of in the first place.
As a whole the argument wants to point out to the depositors ,that don't be too optimistic.Can this be the main point/conclusion of the entire argument?Would love to know your thoughts on this.
Also,is the main point of an argument in most cases the conclusion as well?

The conclusion is the main point of the argument. It is the author's opinion; what the author wants to put forward to the reader.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Current Student
Joined: 04 Mar 2014
Posts: 142
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 178

Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2014, 05:26
ok,got it Karishma,
basically conclusion=main point of the Arg
Re: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top   [#permalink] 17 Oct 2014, 05:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 59 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives 0 16 Feb 2016, 07:36
Several well known scientists have hypothesized that the food additive 3 30 Sep 2016, 01:57
#Top150 CR: The earliest known records of wartime activities detail 3 27 Feb 2016, 07:22
Since it has become known that several of a bank's ' top 0 02 Sep 2015, 07:07
5 Several of a certain bank's top executives have recently 10 04 Nov 2015, 20:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Since it has become known that several of a bank's top

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.