Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 00:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our

Author Message
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1083
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 567 [0], given: 0

Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 06:36
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.
Manager
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 55
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 15:42
Is it A?

Since, travel times have nothing to od with money and saving lives.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 263
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 16

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 19:14
marcodonzelli wrote:
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.

(A) does nothing to strengthen the claim. All others do
_________________
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 576
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 19:42
simple one i guess..except A , all strengthens.
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2562
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 21:00
marcodonzelli wrote:
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.

I vote for none of the above. I think all of them strengthen. However, I chose A as well b/c it was the weakest.

B: saves money OUT
C: accidents, less chance of fatal accidents OUT
D: def OUT saves lives
E: saves money OUT

A: If times are not lengthened considerable then there is less of a chance of an accident so I think this can somewhat strengthen the argument, it is weak though when compared to the others. So its it. Anyway care to elaborate more on this?
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1083
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 567 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 21:48
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
marcodonzelli wrote:
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.

I vote for none of the above. I think all of them strengthen. However, I chose A as well b/c it was the weakest.

B: saves money OUT
C: accidents, less chance of fatal accidents OUT
D: def OUT saves lives
E: saves money OUT

A: If times are not lengthened considerable then there is less of a chance of an accident so I think this can somewhat strengthen the argument, it is weak though when compared to the others. So its it. Anyway care to elaborate more on this?

OA A
Re: cr test d 2   [#permalink] 30 Jan 2008, 21:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the 2 01 Jul 2009, 06:47
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our 24 05 Jul 2011, 18:54
It is true that increasing demand for a limited number of 8 09 Dec 2008, 06:27
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the 4 18 Oct 2007, 20:21
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our 7 26 Sep 2007, 23:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by