It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 15:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 273
Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2007, 15:23
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Since the passage of the stateâ€™s Clean Air Act ten years ago, the level of industrial pollutants in the air has fallen by an average of 18 percent. This suggests that the restrictions on industry embodied in the act have worked effectively. However, during the same period the state has also suffered through a period of economic decline. The number of businesses in the state has fallen by 10 percent, and the number of workers employed has fallen by 12 percent. It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?

(A) During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.
(B) Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.
(C) Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.
(D) Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.
(E) Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212
Re: CR - air pollution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2007, 15:28
C is good.
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 28

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2007, 14:35
ya (C). it most directly counters the business decline argument. (D) would also be a possible reason for the air improvement but the passage conclusion is based on business decline, not businesses leaving.
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 92

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2007, 15:08
C is good as it counters the argument better than others
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 197
Location: California
Re: CR - air pollution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2007, 17:35
leeye84 wrote:
Since the passage of the stateâ€™s Clean Air Act ten years ago, the level of industrial pollutants in the air has fallen by an average of 18 percent. This suggests that the restrictions on industry embodied in the act have worked effectively. However, during the same period the state has also suffered through a period of economic decline. The number of businesses in the state has fallen by 10 percent, and the number of workers employed has fallen by 12 percent. It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?

(A) During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.
(B) Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.
(C) Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.
(D) Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.
(E) Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.

C
Re: CR - air pollution   [#permalink] 21 Mar 2007, 17:35
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided 0 06 Mar 2013, 19:08
1 CR - Clean Air Act ten years ago 5 06 Apr 2010, 07:54
Since the deregulation of the air travel industry in the 2 17 Oct 2009, 13:29
Q. Since the passage of the state s Clean Air Act ten years 0 30 May 2009, 04:07
Since the passage of the states Clean Air Act ten years ago, 14 08 Oct 2007, 23:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by