It is currently 24 Feb 2018, 05:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1372
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 06:35
3
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

85% (00:53) correct 15% (01:20) wrong based on 601 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Situation: For five years the Souper restaurant chain has maintained rapid sales growth in Danport, primarily by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.
Goal: Souper wishes to achieve continued rapid sales growth in Danport over the next two years.
Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the same rate as in the last two years.

In light of the situation, which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that adopting the proposal would be an ineffective way of achieving the goal?

A. At times at which customers find Souper restaurants too crowded, they often go to other restaurants nearby.
B. The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of other restaurants.
C. Souper restaurants generally offer a much smaller variety of foods than many of the other restaurants in their vicinity.
D. Virtually all potential sites for new Souper restaurants in Danport are located in the vicinity of existing Souper restaurants.
E. Souper restaurants have always offered meals that are somewhat less expensive than meals at restaurants that with Souper for patrons.

Explanations will be appreciated.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Last edited by Skywalker18 on 09 Sep 2017, 21:34, edited 1 time in total.
formatted
Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 07:02
I think fight is between A & D.

D clearly says that all future potential sites of souper restaurants are near by existing souper restaurants only.

So if they continue to expand it will be diverting its own customers only !!!

which clearly weakens the plan !!
Senior Manager
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 281
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 07:09
Marcab wrote:
Situation: For five years the Souper restaurant chain has maintained rapid sales growth in Danport, primarily
by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.
Goal: Souper wishes to achieve continued rapid sales growth in Danport over the next two years.
Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the
same rate as in the last two years.
In light of the situation, which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that adopting the
proposal would be an ineffective way of achieving the goal?
A. At times at which customers find Souper restaurants too crowded, they often go to other restaurants nearby.
Strenghtens the proposal
B. The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of
other restaurants. This option doesn't provide any additional informations about these other restaurants
C. Souper restaurants generally offer a much smaller variety of foods than many of the other restaurants in their
vicinity. If Souper restaurants offer a much smaller variety than many others and they maintained rapid sales growth, then i don't think that will make us doubtful whether opening new souper restaurants will impacts the sales growth
D. Virtually all potential sites for new Souper restaurants in Danport are located in the vicinity of existing Souper
restaurants. CORRECT , if the proposal is to be adopted , and the new souper restaurants are to be opened nearby to existing souper restaurants , there will be no more rapid sales growth because of supply >> demand
E. Souper restaurants have always offered meals that are somewhat less expensive than meals at restaurants that
compete with Souper for patrons. Strenghtens the proposal

Explanations will be appreciated.

Thx Marcab for this tought question !!
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 235
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 08:14
Situation: For five years the Souper restaurant chain has maintained rapid sales growth in Danport, primarily
by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.

Goal: Souper wishes to achieve continued rapid sales growth in Danport over the next two years.

Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the
same rate as in the last two years.

In light of the situation, which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that adopting the proposal would be an ineffective way of achieving the goal?

I think based on relevancy its between B and D as they are the only ones which mention new restaurant. D is a clear winner here. There might be options which weaken the argument in general but we are only interested in weakening the contents present within the proposal ( new restaurants). Will explain in further detail if it isn't clear.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3483
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 18:26
1
KUDOS
This question is an emblem of tough question

maybe easy to narrow but difficult to choice between

A and D are the contenders

D basically state that Souper fill the holes, so no more customers (after all we can't do all the time to the restaurant if we have one at each meter)

D is the best. try to stay focus. me too was tempted a lot by A. Stay focus and when you are unsure re-read the conclusion. In weaken CR you attack the conclusion, basically
_________________
Intern
Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Posts: 5
Schools: AGSM '15
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2012, 19:35
It was a choice between A and D for me and ultimately went for D.

A. At times at which customers find Souper restaurants too crowded, they often go to other restaurants nearby.

If the restaurant is losing revenues because people do not want to wait, then opening a new chain nearby will capture some of that loss revenue. It may or may not be profitable, but the question isn't regarding profits, it's regarding sales. This would support the proposal.

B. The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of
other restaurants.

This is simply a rehash of the first sentence.

C. Souper restaurants generally offer a much smaller variety of foods than many of the other restaurants in their
vicinity.

There's nothing in the original argument that mentions the variety of food. Irrelevant.

D. Virtually all potential sites for new Souper restaurants in Danport are located in the vicinity of existing Souper
restaurants.

Without any additional information, this statement can either weaken or strengthen the proposal. If for example, information from A) was given as true, then this will strengthen the proposal. However, we do not have any other information other than what is stated. Since the situation already mentions that new Souper restaurants draw patrons away from other restaurants nearby, opening additional Souper restaurants nearby will have minimal effect.

E. Souper restaurants have always offered meals that are somewhat less expensive than meals at restaurants that
compete with Souper for patrons.

Irrelevant as the argument is not about the price of meals.
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 169
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2012, 06:03
carcass wrote:
This question is an emblem of tough question

maybe easy to narrow but difficult to choice between

A and D are the contenders

D basically state that Souper fill the holes, so no more customers (after all we can't do all the time to the restaurant if we have one at each meter)

D is the best. try to stay focus. me too was tempted a lot by A. Stay focus and when you are unsure re-read the conclusion. In weaken CR you attack the conclusion, basically

Hi Carcass,

I don't think option A weakens the conclusion. In fact A strengthens the conclusion. If Souper restaurants are doing so well that they get crowded and customers go to other restaurant, it shows there is potential to open more Souper restaurants in vicinity and get more sales. Thus, strengthening the conclusion.

What's your thought?? Did I miss something??
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 38
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2012, 08:04
Good Question Marcab. Kudos!
Answer is D since this will seriously doubt the business plan of the restaurant.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10333
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2014, 18:12
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10333
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2016, 05:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 110
GPA: 3.92
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2016, 16:05
D is clearly correct. It perfectly ties adds a new premise that undermines the conclusion, which is necessary for a "weaken" question.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 263
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2017, 22:13
I picked A so long as I've concluded that double negation in form of " argues that......would be an ineffective way...." asks us to find a strengthener, however after reviewing the explanations saw that such understanding is incorrect and weakener is suppposed to de detected.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1914
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2017, 21:37
Situation: For five years the Souper restaurant chain has maintained rapid sales growth in Danport, primarily by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.
Goal: Souper wishes to achieve continued rapid sales growth in Danport over the next two years.
Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the same rate as in the last two years.

Type -weaken

A. At times at which customers find Souper restaurants too crowded, they often go to other restaurants nearby. - strengthens - Souper Restaurants are losing customers to other restaurants because their restaurants are too crowded. This supports the idea that Souper Restaurants SHOULD build more restaurants.

B. The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of other restaurants. - Irrelevant
C. Souper restaurants generally offer a much smaller variety of foods than many of the other restaurants in their vicinity. - Irrelevant
D. Virtually all potential sites for new Souper restaurants in Danport are located in the vicinity of existing Souper restaurants. - Correct - If any new restaurant will be built in the potential sites, the new ones will eat into revenue of the existing ones'
E. Souper restaurants have always offered meals that are somewhat less expensive than meals at restaurants that with Souper for patrons. - Irrelevant

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Re: Situation : For five years the Souper restaurant chain has   [#permalink] 09 Sep 2017, 21:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by