It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 15:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 89 [1], given: 1

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2009, 16:13
1
KUDOS
noboru wrote:
Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early buyers apparently lost interest in obtaining videos to watch on it. The trade of businesses selling and renting videos is still buoyant, because the number of homes with video recorders is still growing. But clearly, once the market for video recorders is saturated, businesses distributing videos face hard times.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The market for video recorders would not be considered saturated until there was one in 80 percent of homes.
(B) Among the items handled by video distributors are many films specifically produced as video features.
(C) Few of the early buyers of video recorders raised any complaints about performance aspects of the new product.
(D) The early buyers of a novel product are always people who are quick to acquire novelties, but also often as quick to tire of them.
(E) In a shrinking market, competition always intensifies and marginal businesses fail.

Premise1: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early buyers apparently lost interest in obtaining videos to watch on it

Premsie 2:The trade of businesses selling and renting videos is still buoyant, because the number of homes with video recorders is still growing

Conclusion:But clearly, once the market for video recorders is saturated, businesses distributing videos face hard times.
Note that the real concluion is not "businesses distributing videos face hard times" but the fact that "Market will become satuarated" and what is the premise....some early buyers have apparenty lost insterest in buying videos to watch it...
what weakens that "video makt will staurate"?
anything which shows that this losing interest beong to a specific community of buyers and not a trend in general. hence D
Though D is the answer choice because it sounds best,it is important to know why it is the best

Kudos [?]: 89 [1], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2009, 14:32
thangduong wrote:
what is OA. I see D is not right. D repeats evidence

IMO B. another cause exists.

IMO "B". To weaken the conclusion,we need to break the cause effect relationship as stated in the argument- (Cause) once the market for video recorders is saturated - (effect )businesses distributing videos face hard times."B" provides an alternative by implying that even if market for video recorders gets saturated, demand for video films might not decrease due to other features.What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 13

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2009, 18:39
The OA on another forum is given as D. I agree.

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 39

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2009, 03:50
I'll say D too.
_________________

Consider giving Kudos if you like the post.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 39

Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 10

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2009, 22:18
Yeap D.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2009, 22:36
orsang8 wrote:
Yeap D.

What is the OA? D looks very weak.Can the originator post the OA and source?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 39

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 00:17
agree with sasen.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 39

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2010, 12:08
no doubt it should be D

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 14 [5], given: 4

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2010, 12:08
5
KUDOS
D is most relevant.

The argument is that an initial group of people bought a video recorder and then grew tired of it after so many months and then stop obtaining new videos. The conclusion is that once everyone who buys this new video recorder (100% market saturation) and then tire of it will ultimately hurt the video production market.

The point of D pokes a hole in this conclusion by showing that author's test group of "initial buyers" may not have the same usage pattern with the video recorder as a "future buyer" might. In a nutshell, D states that the author may be comparing apples to oranges which means that the argument is not conclusive.

Kudos [?]: 14 [5], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 29

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2010, 12:15
My reasoning is the same. Good explaination. Early adopters are different than late buyers.

proccountant wrote:
D is most relevant.

The argument is that an initial group of people bought a video recorder and then grew tired of it after so many months and then stop obtaining new videos. The conclusion is that once everyone who buys this new video recorder (100% market saturation) and then tire of it will ultimately hurt the video production market.

The point of D pokes a hole in this conclusion by showing that author's test group of "initial buyers" may not have the same usage pattern with the video recorder as a "future buyer" might. In a nutshell, D states that the author may be comparing apples to oranges which means that the argument is not conclusive.

_________________

My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own. I am the force; I can clear any obstacle before me or I can be lost in the maze. My choice; my responsibility; win or lose, only I hold the key to my destiny - Elaine Maxwell

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 29

Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2010, 23:32
D) The early buyers of a novel product are always people who are quick to acquire novelties, but also often as quick to tire of them.

the above statement criticizes the early buyers so this obviously weakens the argument

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1489

Kudos [?]: 1449 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 14:31
BTW, OA is D.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1449 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 20

Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 09:11
can anyone give a logical explanation for why B is wrong? fine D is the OA. In a weaken question the burden of proof is just to tilt the balance enough; not to affirmatively and conclusively prove the conclusion wrong.

is b wrong because it uses "video features" -- 'features' is not used anywhere in the passage

if "video features" is the same as "videos" then surely B is a good weakening answer as this stuff is "among the items" handled by the distributors; so even if the mkt saturates they can always sell the other goods and not face a "hard time"...

but is B wrong because it uses 'features'?

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 20

Manager
Status: I am Midnight's Child !
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 140

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 11

WE 1: Software Design and Development
Re: Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2010, 08:46
1
KUDOS
noboru wrote:
Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early buyers apparently lost interest in obtaining videos to watch on it. The trade of businesses selling and renting videos is still buoyant, because the number of homes with video recorders is still growing. But clearly, once the market for video recorders is saturated, businesses distributing videos face hard times.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The market for video recorders would not be considered saturated until there was one in 80 percent of homes.
(B) Among the items handled by video distributors are many films specifically produced as video features.
(C) Few of the early buyers of video recorders raised any complaints about performance aspects of the new product.
(D) The early buyers of a novel product are always people who are quick to acquire novelties, but also often as quick to tire of them.
(E) In a shrinking market, competition always intensifies and marginal businesses fail.

IMO D. The early buyers are not suitable subjects of survey causing the entire argument to fail.

@gmat1011 : B is wrong because early buyers lost interest of videos to watch on the recorders. As Video Features are supplements to the videos, we can surely say that they will not attract the buyers. Moreover further information on Video Features are not provided in the passage allowing us to clear this choice easily.
_________________

Argument : If you love long trips, you love the GMAT.
Conclusion : GMAT is long journey.

What does the author assume ?
Assumption : A long journey is a long trip.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 23 Feb 2011
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 07:50
I'm struggling with what the conclusion is based on the responses above. It looks like the conclusion could be the first sentence, because the writer uses the word apparently, which is his/her opinion/conclusion. If that's the case, isn't the conclusion that early buyers don't want videos to watch on their recorder. It implies that there must be something wrong with the recorder. It doesn't imply that people don't like watching videos, because the demand for players is still high. If you want to weaken this conclusion, which I think means on the contrary, wouldn't C be on the contrary. Since people still want to watch videos, they will need a player. If there aren't very many complaints, then why wouldn't people want the player that the early buyers bought.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 396 [2], given: 123

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 08:17
2
KUDOS
keyword "clearly" separates the conclusion from the premise.

Paraphrase - People get tired of watching the VCR after 6 months of purchase. The sales which is high now will slacken in the coming days. Clearly, the market for VCR is going to face hard times when the market is saturated.

"Weaken" means weaken the conclusion.

(D) The early buyers of a novel product are always people who are quick to acquire novelties, but also often as quick to tire of them. -> this tells us that there will ALWAYS be a market for the product and hence weakens the conclusion.

smiddy1860 wrote:
I'm struggling with what the conclusion is based on the responses above. It looks like the conclusion could be the first sentence, because the writer uses the word apparently, which is his/her opinion/conclusion. If that's the case, isn't the conclusion that early buyers don't want videos to watch on their recorder. It implies that there must be something wrong with the recorder. It doesn't imply that people don't like watching videos, because the demand for players is still high. If you want to weaken this conclusion, which I think means on the contrary, wouldn't C be on the contrary. Since people still want to watch videos, they will need a player. If there aren't very many complaints, then why wouldn't people want the player that the early buyers bought.

Kudos [?]: 396 [2], given: 123

Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 174 [1], given: 9

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 08:34
1
KUDOS
Assumtion: Early buyers => tired of product
D's point: Early buyers =/= (might not) later buyers so the argument falls apart.

Kudos [?]: 174 [1], given: 9

Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 10:34
I was lost on this one... not one of the statements looked relevant. Thank you everyone for your input.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 11:39
proccountant wrote:
D is most relevant.

The argument is that an initial group of people bought a video recorder and then grew tired of it after so many months and then stop obtaining new videos. The conclusion is that once everyone who buys this new video recorder (100% market saturation) and then tire of it will ultimately hurt the video production market.

The point of D pokes a hole in this conclusion by showing that author's test group of "initial buyers" may not have the same usage pattern with the video recorder as a "future buyer" might. In a nutshell, D states that the author may be comparing apples to oranges which means that the argument is not conclusive.

Thank you very much for helping me clear up this question. I was totally lost. I found that discussing it with someone helps to bring out ideas. When you have to explain it to someone, you discover the answer, so I recommend, for those like me, who have a hard time with these questions, read them out loud to someone. Preferably an older child or teenager, so you have to explain it and understand it while you're explaining.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 22

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 70

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2011, 13:01
D....good one

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: video recorders   [#permalink] 23 Feb 2011, 13:01

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 62 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Six months or so after getting a video recorder, many early

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.