It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 06:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 933 [3], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2013, 07:14
3
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:34) correct 36% (01:46) wrong based on 548 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in support of M-Theory, the so-called breakthrough theory that proponents claim will unify our understanding of matter, the origin of the universe, and the functioning of gravity. This theory is nothing more than "bunk" and "hot air" concocted by desperate scientists.

Which of the following arguments possesses a flaw similar to that presented in the skeptic's argument?

A) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

B) Chris must be ashamed of his new girlfriend. When I ran into them together at the market, he tried to pretend that they were just friends.

C) SoftCo's continued delays in the release of its new operating system, ViewPoint, indicate that it must be having significant challenges in producing a bug-free product.

D) Other people say they've seen the Loch Ness Monster, and some have even taken photographs of it. Still others claim these sightings are hoaxes.

E)Some fans think that the many delays in the release of Thrashing Death's much-anticipated new album mean that the band hasn't actually recorded anything. But I think that they've actually finished it and are delaying release to build hype.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 933 [3], given: 322

3 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3425

Kudos [?]: 9542 [3], given: 1203

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2013, 16:22
3
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
@ targetgmatchotu

I noticed, lately, a bunch of questions from veritas prep question bank posted here on the board from you. As a matter of fact, I also noticed that you (maybe I'm right maybe I'm wrong) posted them because you have difficulties with CR (indeed all we have difficulties). As such, I suggest you, aside to revise each question and the explanation, to study what the question ask you, whatever it is: weaken assumption and so on.

Look at this

critical-reasoning-megathread-145178.html

Now back to the question at end, the best strategy for these kind of questions, that are a minor question type of the entire CR battery, is to UNDERSTAND the overall structure of the stimulus and read each word carefully. repeat carefully. the key is in these such words. Otherwise are even impossible to solve and , to be honest, you are right: are among the most difficulties questions

Stimulus: basically it says that a X theory is a waste of time to unify the different theories about the universe and so on.

Conclusion: al these information are "hot air"

Skeptic: \(No\) scientific \(evidence\) has been collected in support of M-Theory, the so-called breakthrough theory that proponents claim will unify our understanding of matter, the origin of the universe, and the functioning of gravity. This theory is nothing more than "bunk" and "hot air" concocted by desperate scientists.


A) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

As you can see from the bold part that I highlighted you have the key word proof \(=\) \(evidence\) and the second part but no one has ever met him!

So basically, A says the same thing of the stimulus.

Now is clear ?? :)

Hope this helps
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 9542 [3], given: 1203

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 933 [2], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2013, 19:38
2
This post received
KUDOS
I think your explanation needs a little bit of correction.

A) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

As you can see from the bold part that I highlighted you have the key word proof and the second part but no one has ever met him!

Conclusion: Jan makes things up to get attention
Evidence : she talks about her new boyfriend,who doesn't exist

Conclusion:M-Thry is bogus.
Evidence: Evidence is that there is no evidence in support of theory.

So (A). proof = No Evidence exist in support of A thry.

Plz correct me If I am wrong.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 933 [2], given: 322

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3425

Kudos [?]: 9542 [1], given: 1203

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2013, 06:09
1
This post received
KUDOS

Kudos [?]: 9542 [1], given: 1203

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 84

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2013, 17:57
TGC wrote:
Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in support of M-Theory, the so-called breakthrough theory that proponents claim will unify our understanding of matter, the origin of the universe, and the functioning of gravity. This theory is nothing more than "bunk" and "hot air" concocted by desperate scientists.

Which of the following arguments possesses a flaw similar to that presented in the skeptic's argument?

1) Jan makes things up to get attention. If you want proof, just look at how much she talks about her new boyfriend, but no one has ever met him!

2) Chris must be ashamed of his new girlfriend. When I ran into them together at the market, he tried to pretend that they were just friends.

3) SoftCo's continued delays in the release of its new operating system, ViewPoint, indicate that it must be having significant challenges in producing a bug-free product.

4) Other people say they've seen the Loch Ness Monster, and some have even taken photographs of it. Still others claim these sightings are hoaxes.

5)Some fans think that the many delays in the release of Thrashing Death's much-anticipated new album mean that the band hasn't actually recorded anything. But I think that they've actually finished it and are delaying release to build hype.

Source: Veri prep

Someone plz elaborate techiniques to solve || reasoning questions ,they are taking big time and still unsolvable.
Plz Help !!!

Edit: by carcass


Passage construction
Premise - Background - Conclusion

A. Conclusion - Premise- Background
B. Conclusion- Premise
C. Premise- Conclusion
D. Premise- Counterpremise / Counter Premise
E. CounterPremise- Conclusion

From ABC Since more information is give in A i would choose A.

Thanks TGC

:banana
_________________

Thanks for Posting

LEARN TO ANALYSE

+1 kudos if you like

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 84

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 11

Schools: HBS '17
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V35
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2013, 06:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
Would look at it this way -
Argument - X states Y for publicity. Nothing supports Y.

1)Jane boasts about her boy friend. He may not exist. Seems correct.
2) X did Y because Z happened
3) May be X did Y because of Z
4) X claims Y. Y may not be true.
Close candidate
5) X thinks Y happened because of Z. W thinks it happened to build hype.

Thus A.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 11

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10224

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2015, 16:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 585

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 231

Location: United States (LA)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2016, 13:57
option a is the clear winner in this question

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 231

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 72

Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 03:22
Correct Answer: A

The skeptic argues that simply because no evidence exists to support M-Theory, it must be false. Answer choice A is correct and matches this idea, since if Jan's boyfriend has not been seen, she must have invented him. Answer choice B is incorrect because its flaw is opposite to that given in the original stimulus; it involves denying something even in the face of proof. C and E are incorrect because both answer choices involve finding an alternative explanation for something unseen. Answer choice D offers no judgment, unlike the prompt, and is therefore also incorrect.

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 72

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1379

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1488

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2017, 19:24
surely, both application and parallel question in critical reasoning are partly logic questions.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1488

Re: Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2017, 19:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Skeptic: No scientific evidence has been collected in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.