GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 26 Jun 2019, 17:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 540
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2014, 19:09
2
10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (02:22) correct 39% (02:33) wrong based on 261 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community members would always be used less carefully than would private recreational equipment. Each member would have an incentive to overuse the equipment and leave any damage unreported because the benefit would accrue to the individual, while the costs of maintaining, repairing, and replacing the equipment would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 200 sailboats owned cooperatively by the Bayside Recreation League and 370 sailboats owned privately showed that the recreation league sailboats were in better condition.

Which of the following, if true and known by the Bayside members, would best help explain the results of the study?


A. With private sailboats, both the costs and the benefits of avoiding any repairs fall to the individual owner.

B. For boats that are used by many different people, it is difficult to attribute the costs of maintenance and repair to the wear and tear caused by any individual user.

C. Routine inspections and repairs of recreation league sailboats are conducted during the winter months, not during the May – September sailing season.

D. If one Bayside member causes even minor damage to a sailboat without paying for the repair, other members will do so even more, and the costs to each user will outweigh the benefits.

E. There are many more private sailboats than cooperatively-owned sailboats.

_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Re: Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2014, 00:48
Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community members would always be used less carefully than would private recreational equipment. Each member would have an incentive to overuse the equipment and leave any damage unreported because the benefit would accrue to the individual, while the costs of maintaining, repairing, and replacing the equipment would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 200 sailboats owned cooperatively by the Bayside Recreation League and 370 sailboats owned privately showed that the recreation league sailboats were in better condition.


although there is a reason to justify the better usage of private owned recreational equipments than the public ones, the condition of these equipments is worse than the equipments owned cooperatively.
in the argument with comparison structure, it is assumed that all conditions of the two cases compared are similar.
to explain the contradiction, we can consider that the initial condition of the two cases were not comparable.
I didn't read the question stem carefully and chose C.
by considering the question stem, D is the correct answer! which is an exception of the stated premise
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 159
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2014, 02:42
1
2
tuanquang269 wrote:
This is my new project: Renew Old Thread => Back to basic => Just try It and give your reasoning
The topic will be sticky for 2 days from starting


Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community members would always be used less carefully than would private recreational equipment. Each member would have an incentive to overuse the equipment and leave any damage unreported because the benefit would accrue to the individual, while the costs of maintaining, repairing, and replacing the equipment would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 200 sailboats owned cooperatively by the Bayside Recreation League and 370 sailboats owned privately showed that the recreation league sailboats were in better condition.

Which of the following, if true and known by the Bayside members, would best help explain the results of the study?

A, With private sailboats, both the costs and the benefits of avoiding any repairs fall to the individual owner.
B, For boats that are used by many different people, it is difficult to attribute the costs of maintenance and repair to the wear and tear caused by any individual user.
C, Routine inspections and repairs of recreation league sailboats are conducted during the winter months, not during the May – September sailing season.
D, If one Bayside member causes even minor damage to a sailboat without paying for the repair, other members will do so even more, and the costs to each user will outweigh the benefits.
E, There are many more private sailboats than cooperatively-owned sailboats.


We need something that says the cost also accrue to the individual in this case , that's why the recreation league sailboats were in better condition. D says that the costs to individual > the benefits to individual , while in common case, the costs to individual < the benefits to individual. So D is the answer.
_________________
.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4658
Re: Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2019, 16:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4658
Re: Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2019, 03:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by   [#permalink] 21 May 2019, 03:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by community

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne