GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 09:17

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 272
Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2012, 05:45
2
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

74% (02:07) correct 26% (02:41) wrong based on 145 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of cigarette will not find it easier to quit and in fact may find harder. It may be that smokers think that a lighter brand is better for their health and is therefore an acceptable alternative to giving up completely. As per a study conducted on 50,000 smokers, those who switched brands were 58% more likely to have tried to quit smoking than those who stuck with their brands. But they were 60% less likely to actually succeed in quitting. Other research has shown that so-called low-tar cigarettes have just as much tar, nicotine and other compounds as regular cigarettes.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first part provides evidence that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second is an explanation in support of main conclusion.
B. The first part is a prediction that, if correct, would support the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
C. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first part is a presumption that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of the main conclusion.

I dont have the OA and OE.
IMO D
Senior Manager
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 487
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 17 Aug 2012, 11:32
A. The first part provides evidence that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second is an explanation in support of main conclusion.
B. The first part is a prediction that, if correct, would support the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
C. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first part is a presumption that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of the main conclusion. right
"smokers think"- presumption
"58% and 60% "- evidence in support of main conclusion that-smokers don't quit !

_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Originally posted by thevenus on 17 Aug 2012, 06:50.
Last edited by thevenus on 17 Aug 2012, 11:32, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 119
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.9
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2012, 10:58
1
Is it E? i feel E gives us the best explanation
SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1851
Concentration: Finance
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Oct 2013, 09:37
rohitgoel15 wrote:
Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of cigarette will not find it easier to quit and in fact may find harder. It may be that smokers think that a lighter brand is better for their health and is therefore an acceptable alternative to giving up completely. As per a study conducted on 50,000 smokers, those who switched brands were 58% more likely to have tried to quit smoking than those who stuck with their brands. But they were 60% less likely to actually succeed in quitting. Other research has shown that so-called low-tar cigarettes have just as much tar, nicotine and other compounds as regular cigarettes.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first part provides evidence that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second is an explanation in support of main conclusion.
B. The first part is a prediction that, if correct, would support the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
C. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first part is a presumption that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of the main conclusion.

I dont have the OA and OE.
IMO D

Does the first bold phrase actually weaken the main conclusion?
From my understanding the main conclusion is that smokers might find it harder to quit, so they probably never will. Now if A is true then it supports the conclusion because of they believe that a lighted brand is better for their health then they will in fact never quit.

Any other opinions around here?
Cheers
J
Intern
Joined: 09 Aug 2013
Posts: 4
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 00:47
I agree with you jlgdr..could we please have the OA for this !
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 91
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 02:45
A. The first part provides evidence that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second is an explanation in support of main conclusion. --- Although the first statement, I feel is correct. But the second statement is not an explanation but hard evidence from a research that supports the main conclusion.
B. The first part is a prediction that, if correct, would support the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion. --- Incorrect because the first statement- if correct would weaken the conclusion.
C. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusion of the argument. --- The second statement is not a claim but evidence of the research conducted.
D. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented in support of the main conclusion of the argument. ---- The first statement is not a finding. It is just an opinion of a smoker.
E. The first part is a presumption that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of the main conclusion. ---- CORRECT. The first statement is a presumption, because it basically gives an opinion of the smoker. The second statement provides evidence that strengthens the main conclusion of the argument.
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
GPA: 3
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 06:17
A. The first part provides evidence that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second is an explanation in support of main conclusion. Incorrect. as the first part cannot be an evidence. No need to analyze further.
B. The first part is a prediction that, if correct, would support the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion. Incorrect. The first statement cannot be a prediction as it is not supported with any facts or findings.
C. The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusion of the argument. Incorrect. Again, the first part cannot be a claim. The phrase 'it may be' is not strong enough to be called a claim.
D. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented in support of the main conclusion of the argument. Incorrect. The first is not a finding.
E. The first part is a presumption that, if correct, would weaken the main conclusion; the second provides evidence in support of the main conclusion. Correct as the first statement clearly shows an opinion or assumption that the author has made.
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 39
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT Date: 12-10-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Oct 2013, 08:29
Its between D and E.

It may be that smokers think that a lighter brand is better for their health and is therefore an acceptable alternative to giving up completely ---- its a believe or presumption,not an evidence. and it is opposed in the last sentence -----> Other research has shown that so-called low-tar cigarettes have just as much tar, nicotine and other compounds as regular cigarettes.---- ( more inclined towards D )

those who switched brands were 58% more likely to have tried to quit smoking than those who stuck with their brands. But they were 60% less likely to actually succeed in quitting.
its a fact or evidence. and it support to the argument ---> will not find it easier to quit

I will go with D.
what is the OA?
SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1851
Concentration: Finance
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Apr 2014, 18:06
Can we have OA/OE for this one, I think this is a great question

Thanks
Cheers!
J
Manager
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 209
Location: India
Re: Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Nov 2017, 01:59
1
I first had trouble solving this question and finally now i understood why it is E and not D . B1 - tells us that the switch in the brand used for smoking can help quit the smoking habit. B2 - gives evidence that there is no such possibility.
So D says that the first is evaluated , But the result can be a yes or no. So the B2 can be either an supporting or weakening statement . So hence D cannot be the answer. Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 517
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Nov 2017, 02:50
Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of cigarette will not find it easier to quit and in fact may find harder. It may be that smokers think that a lighter brand is better for their health and is therefore an acceptable alternative to giving up completely. As per a study conducted on 50,000 smokers, those who switched brands were 58% more likely to have tried to quit smoking than those who stuck with their brands. But they were 60% less likely to actually succeed in quitting. Other research has shown that so-called low-tar cigarettes have just as much tar, nicotine and other compounds as regular cigarettes.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

B. The first part is a prediction that, if correct, would support the main conclusion; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of the blue and different from all other votes, B. is the option I contend for.

Main Conclusion- " Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of cigarette will not find it easier to quit and in fact may find harder." (Since main conclusion can never be a data reported as premise, the last sentence of premise is not the main conclusion, as possibly believed by many.)

If the BF1, a prediction, is correct, then smokers actually think that a lighter brand is better for their health and is therefore an acceptable alternative to giving up completely. This provides a strong support that the smokers are much less likely to quit smoking after switching to a lighter brand. In fact, the perception of "lighter brands are healthier" will make it harder for smokers to quit, thus supporting the main conclusion.

BF2- "those who switched brands were 58% more likely to have tried to quit smoking than those who stuck with their brands. But they were 60% less likely to actually succeed in quitting" - clearly drawn to support the main conclusion by providing statistical information about the relative ease of quitting among the two groups.

Great Question!!
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq

Smokers who switched to a low-tar, light or mild brand of &nbs [#permalink] 24 Nov 2017, 02:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.