It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 01:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires.

Author Message
VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 18:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. Despite a significant decline in cigarette smoking in the last two decades, there has been no comparable decline in the number of people killed in home fires.

Each one of the following statements, if true over the last two decades, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy above EXCEPT:

A) Compared to other types of home fires, home fires caused by smoking in bed usually cause relatively little damage before they are extinguished.

B) Home fires caused by smoking in bed often break out after the home's occupants have fallen asleep.

C) Smokers who smoke in bed tend to be heavy smokers who are less likely to quit smoking than are smokers who do not smoke in bed.

D) An increasing number of people have been killed in home fires that started in the kitchen.

E) Population densities have increased, with the result that one home fire can cause more deaths than in previous decades.

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Smoking in bed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 19:07
u2lover wrote:
Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. Despite a significant decline in cigarette smoking in the last two decades, there has been no comparable decline in the number of people killed in home fires.

Each one of the following statements, if true over the last two decades, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy above EXCEPT:

A) Compared to other types of home fires, home fires caused by smoking in bed usually cause relatively little damage before they are extinguished.

B) Home fires caused by smoking in bed often break out after the home's occupants have fallen asleep.

C) Smokers who smoke in bed tend to be heavy smokers who are less likely to quit smoking than are smokers who do not smoke in bed.

D) An increasing number of people have been killed in home fires that started in the kitchen.

E) Population densities have increased, with the result that one home fire can cause more deaths than in previous decades.

guess these questions are from barrons and it has been frequestly advised that these materials are toooooooooooooo poor to maintain the standard of real gmat tests.

however, i go with D.

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Smoking in bed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 19:44
MA wrote:
guess these questions are from barrons and it has been frequestly advised that these materials are toooooooooooooo poor to maintain the standard of real gmat tests.

however, i go with D.

I abandoned Barrons a while ago

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 19:45
I go with B.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 567

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: Munich,Germany
Re: CR: Smoking in bed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 20:24
u2lover wrote:
Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. Despite a significant decline in cigarette smoking in the last two decades, there has been no comparable decline in the number of people killed in home fires.

Each one of the following statements, if true over the last two decades, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy above EXCEPT:

A) Compared to other types of home fires, home fires caused by smoking in bed usually cause relatively little damage before they are extinguished.

B) Home fires caused by smoking in bed often break out after the home's occupants have fallen asleep.

C) Smokers who smoke in bed tend to be heavy smokers who are less likely to quit smoking than are smokers who do not smoke in bed.

D) An increasing number of people have been killed in home fires that started in the kitchen.

E) Population densities have increased, with the result that one home fire can cause more deaths than in previous decades.

I choose A.

I was stuck between A and B. However, in B, it could be that since people are asleep they have lesser time to react to the fire caused by smoking and this could still explain the higher deaths.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 18

Location: Arkansas, US
WE 1: 2.5 yrs in manufacturing

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 21:50
I go with A. It is the least relevant

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 18

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2006, 23:55
B for me 2
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 00:03
Beg to differ But IMO its C

Look at the primse :
Cigarrete somking has declined.
And the conclusion:
despite above, the number of house fires have not declined.

Now option C gives a reason why cigarrete smoking may have declined but still may not have contributed to the any decline in house fires.

If smokers who smoke on bed donot quit smoking whereas other smokers who donot smoke on bed quit, there is ur decline in smoking. But there is no decline in people who smoke on bed. The major reason for house fires.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Location: Italy
Re: CR: Smoking in bed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 00:58
In this question type: Resolve the paradox in order to be fit the answear has to address both the sides of the paradox, in this case we are looking for a solution that example address to only one of the sides, now lets tackle the answears,.....

Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. Despite a significant decline in cigarette smoking in the last two decades, there has been no comparable decline in the number of people killed in home fires.

Each one of the following statements, if true over the last two decades, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy above EXCEPT:

A) Compared to other types of home fires, home fires caused by smoking in bed usually cause relatively little damage before they are extinguished.

B) Home fires caused by smoking in bed often break out after the home's occupants have fallen asleep.

C) Smokers who smoke in bed tend to be heavy smokers who are less likely to quit smoking than are smokers who do not smoke in bed.

D) An increasing number of people have been killed in home fires that started in the kitchen. explain the paradox

E) Population densities have increased, with the result that one home fire can cause more deaths than in previous decades. explain the paradox

I am not sure about B or C using at this point POE I would keep B because it seems that deviate from the scope of the passage,

my correct answear would be B
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Location: Italy

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 01:03
Raghavender wrote:
I go with A. It is the least relevant

Is wrong because explains why deaths are not declining due cigarettes home fires
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 10:00
jaynayak wrote:
Beg to differ But IMO its C

Look at the primse :
Cigarrete somking has declined.
And the conclusion:
despite above, the number of house fires have not declined.

Now option C gives a reason why cigarrete smoking may have declined but still may not have contributed to the any decline in house fires.
If smokers who smoke on bed donot quit smoking whereas other smokers who donot smoke on bed quit, there is ur decline in smoking. But there is no decline in people who smoke on bed. The major reason for house fires.

so option C is helping to explain the discrepancy.

I think answer should be A as it does not explain the discrepancy.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 10:34
Is it (B)

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 12:22
I go with B.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Smoking in bed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 23:04
A) Compared to other types of home fires, home fires caused by smoking in bed usually cause relatively little damage before they are extinguished.

correct.. Yes, this doesn't explain paradox at all..

B) Home fires caused by smoking in bed often break out after the home's occupants have fallen asleep.

This explains better than A, though doesn't make much sense..

C) Smokers who smoke in bed tend to be heavy smokers who are less likely to quit smoking than are smokers who do not smoke in bed.

This explains very well..Poeple who used to smoke in bed still smoke.. And smoking in bed is cause for fires..

D) An increasing number of people have been killed in home fires that started in the kitchen.

Yes, this explains a different reason why the accidents haven't come down..

E) Population densities have increased, with the result that one home fire can cause more deaths than in previous decades.

This also explains very well..

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2006, 23:14
Took the full two minutes to narrow it down to A and B.

(A) just simply does not resolve any sort of paradox.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2006, 14:22
OA is B

The paradox is that smoking has declined, but fatalities from home fires have increased... so, we are looking for an alternative cause of fires or that smoking is not related to home fires.

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 18

Location: Arkansas, US
WE 1: 2.5 yrs in manufacturing

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2006, 22:22
Gauss wrote:
Raghavender wrote:
I go with A. It is the least relevant

Is wrong because explains why deaths are not declining due cigarettes home fires

Yea Gauss, what you said makes sense. I missd out on the point earlier...

Mann....the CRs need a lot more scutiny, then what i actually do. the CRs in OG are jus too too easy compared to these...
gud for practice

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 18

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 111

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2006, 06:20
Narrowed it down to A & B. A explains the paradox by suggesting that if fires due to smoking in bed causes very little damage, then these fires would not have been responsible for the deaths. Other fires would have been.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

20 Jul 2006, 06:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires.

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.