It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 02:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# So dogged were Frances Perkins investigations of the garment

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

So dogged were Frances Perkins investigations of the garment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2004, 03:35
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:03) correct 50% (02:05) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

So dogged were Frances Perkinsâ€™ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.

A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that

OA will follow. Thank you.

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2004, 21:36
I'm with C, appositive form. E creates a run-on sentence and the second independent clause introduced by the second "so" lacks a verb. Basically, we are comparing a clause(first "so") against a phrase(second "so")
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2004, 22:13
Which is better btw B & E?

I have never seen the structure like B before, it looks weird.

Why not E and can "were" omitted for the choice E?

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 365

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2004, 00:52
Paul wrote:
I'm with C, appositive form. E creates a run-on sentence and the second independent clause introduced by the second "so" lacks a verb. Basically, we are comparing a clause(first "so") against a phrase(second "so")

Paul, is it correct that "Run on" means hooking more than one clauses with comma, without proper connector (such as conjuction/relative pronoun/semicolon).
here, choice "E" is not run-on but parallel to "so dogged...", where "dogged" is an adjective(IMHO - 'dooged' is not verb here) and goes parallel with "so persistent" and creates parallelism.
"Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government" creats independant clause, which is connected with "that" - conjuction.
_________________

Perseverance, Hard Work and self confidence

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2004, 01:06
I may be wrong here but E, as I was saying, is comparing two supposedly independent clause without a conjunction.
So dogged were Frances Perkinsâ€™ investigations of the garment industry
The verb in the first independent clause is "were". To establish parallelism, the second part introduced by the idiom "so... and so..." conjunction has to be present. Furthermore, the second independent clause introduced by the second clause does not have any verb whereas the first does. Anyhow, once again, I may be wrong. It's getting late here and I need to throw the towel for tonight
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 64

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2004, 17:43
I still think it is E.

_________________

Thanks !

Aspire

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 320

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 03:19
I prefer C, though it could have been much better with the connector "and".

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 11:21
I remember this one. There were equal votes for C and E. This looks like the US elections

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... perkins%92

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: INDIA

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2004, 10:34
I go for E ...
seems parallel and seems quite simpl as to give a clear meaning...

the 'fight' was interesting though

Have Fun
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: SC - Frances Perkins [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2010, 15:35
6 years later...OA is E.
Coudl anybody explain whether the construction "So X, so Y, that" is therefore correct?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - Frances Perkins   [#permalink] 29 Jul 2010, 15:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# So dogged were Frances Perkins investigations of the garment

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.