It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 23:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2004, 23:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was

B. a greater proportion than

C. a greater proportion than they have been

D. which is greater than was so

E. which is greater than it has been

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Toronto

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 05:08
can it be (B)?

it compares the porportion (TV cost/campaign cost) in 1992 versus the porportion (TV cost/campaign cost) before.

I think it is needless to repeat "they have been" in (C)

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 10:31
I would say C.

Of the total spending the TV cost was half. So we need a choice which makes a this proportional comparision between some other elections. C does this. I think they here referd to the TV cost/Total cost.

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 602

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 10:59
can somebody explain why it is C and not B... when C has "they"

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 850

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 11:51
I think â€˜theyâ€™ in â€˜Câ€™ is wrong. I would go with â€˜Eâ€™

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 602

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 12:20
can somebody explain why it is C and not B... when C has "they"

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 721

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: Milwaukee

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 15:11
vprabhala wrote:
can somebody explain why it is C and not B... when C has "they"

lets look at choices B & C

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

B. a greater proportion than
Lacks a pronoun to accurately compare two spending. a greater proportion than what?, is it the who campain cost?

C. a greater proportion than they have been

Correctly compare two costs using relative pronoun they. Here you would use they because you are comparing costs which is a plural.

Hope this helps
_________________

Praveen

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 606

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 16:19
I vote for C too.
Proportion is important here so D & E are out.
As very well explained above C is the sole answer, where the relation between proportion and the soaring costs they are related to is visible

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 19:34
praveen_rao7 wrote:
vprabhala wrote:
B. a greater proportion than
Lacks a pronoun to accurately compare two spending. a greater proportion than what?, is it the who campain cost?

C. a greater proportion than they have been

Correctly compare two costs using relative pronoun they. Here you would use they because you are comparing costs which is a plural.

For C, the present perfect tense is inappropriate here. A past perfect would be needed if it was the answer.
For B, a pronoun can be ommitted in this case.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City
Re: SC: A tricky question! Help! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 21:10
a: missing verb
b: correct, accounted for more .. a greater proportion than (verb can be skipped in this case)
c: cannot be used, improper use of tense, "have been" must be moved to had been because the previous time is in the past
d: missing noun
e: ackward

Levy wrote:
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was

B. a greater proportion than

C. a greater proportion than they have been

D. which is greater than was so

E. which is greater than it has been

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 44

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 21:37

However, i want to pose a question here, Is there a general rule on ocassions where a verb has to be repeated or should not be repeated [like in this case?]

Furthur, while comparing nouns
Butterflies in the north are more pretty than those in the south
here u have to repeat "those"

So is there a general rule as to when to repeat and when to not

Can someone help ???

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2004, 22:24
taklu wrote:

However, i want to pose a question here, Is there a general rule on ocassions where a verb has to be repeated or should not be repeated [like in this case?]

Furthur, while comparing nouns
Butterflies in the north are more pretty than those in the south
here u have to repeat "those"

So is there a general rule as to when to repeat and when to not

Can someone help ???

IMHO, as to repeat or not speat the verb or the like, it is really optional, depending on the context of question and its answer choices.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2004, 15:23
OA is B.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

10 Nov 2004, 15:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by