It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 05:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Sociologist: Research shows, contrary to popular opinion,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1489

Kudos [?]: 1450 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2010, 13:52
ImJun wrote:
i beat it without even thinking, u call this a 700 level?
lol but sometimes we do get stuck on questions like that

What are you bringing to the table?

I kindly ask you for your thoughts on this question.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1450 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2010, 03:06
noboru wrote:
I'm still not conviced with the reasons you are providing to ruling out A.

Some people who have pets are happier than most people who do not. Suppose two people A(who has a pet) and B(who doesnt have a pet)

Premise says -
A less happy than B

Conclusion-
For A or B to be as happy as possible they should not have a pet

Consider A or B want to be as happy as possible , which of them below statements can they use -
(A) Some people who have pets are happier than most people who do not. - This says that some A are happier than B , doesnt help much to decide how can 1 be more happier.
(D) Most people who have pets feel happier because they have pets - This says that A or for that matter B can be happier if they have a pet which directly attach the conclusion

Hope, it clears the confusion.
_________________

This time , its my time .

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 4

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7676

Kudos [?]: 17375 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2010, 07:12
noboru wrote:
Sociologist: Research shows, contrary to popular opinion, that, all other things being equal, most people who have pets are less happy than most people who do not. Therefore, any person who wants to be as happy as possible would do well to consider not having a pet.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the sociologist’s argument?
(A) Some people who have pets are happier than most people who do not.
(B) Most people who have no pets occasionally wish that they had pets.
(C) Most people who have pets are reasonably happy.
(D) Most people who have pets feel happier because they have pets.
(E) All people who have no pets admit to feeling unhappy sometimes.

Between A and D what is your take?

Premise:
Most people who have pets are less happy than most people who do not.
Conclusion:
Any person who wants to be as happy as possible would do well to consider not having a pet.

What the argument doesn't say is that pets are the reason why people who have them are not as happy. We do not know what is the causal agent here. Is that people were unhappy in the first place and hence got pets to be happier? or is it that they were happy and got pets and then got unhappy?
What would weaken my conclusion is: People were unhappy in the first place and hence got pets and got happier. In that case, getting a pet would make people relatively happier than before.

Option (D) says exactly this. Most people who have pets feel happier because they have pets. Lets say on a scale of 1 to 10 of happiness, people without pets are at 9 and those with pets are at 7. Those who have pets were actually at 5 without pets but came up to 7 because of their pets. So without the pets they would go down to 5 (may be even 3 because losing a pet is terrible but that's besides the point!) This seriously weakens my conclusion that if you want to be as happy as possible, don't get a pet.

Option (A) is incorrect because even if some people who have pets are happier than most people who do not, they could be few and exceptional cases. You cannot draw general statements based on the cases of few people. General statements can be drawn only from what most people experience.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17375 [0], given: 232

Re: pets   [#permalink] 18 Nov 2010, 07:12

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Sociologist: Research shows, contrary to popular opinion,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.