It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 04:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 113 [3], given: 3

Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 03:24
3
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:54) correct 44% (01:36) wrong based on 315 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationshipbetween people and their institutions. After all,institutions are merely collections of people.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?

(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually.

(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect.

(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings.

(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values.

(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If questions jerk in your mind, then give me a KUDOS

Kudos [?]: 113 [3], given: 3

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 278 [4], given: 9

Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 19:56
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
The sociologist is arguing against the idea that institutions cause people to be evil, and his evidence is that institutions are made up of people. Answer choice E supports the sociologist's argument, because if the whole (in this case the institution) DID determine the properties of the things that compose it (the people), then that would support the romantic's point of view (that institutions cause people to become evil). The sociologist is arguing against the romantic, and stating that the whole does NOT determine the characteristics of the parts, so answer choice E helps justify the sociologist's argument.

I hope this helps!!!
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Save \$100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 278 [4], given: 9

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10129

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2015, 10:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1905

Kudos [?]: 542 [0], given: 23

Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 May 2015, 23:53
Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not born evil but may be made evil by the imperfect institutions that they form cannot be right, for they misunderstand the causal relationship between people and their institutions. After all, institutions are merely collections of people.
The conclusion is that people with bad intentions can make an institution imperfect. This is in opposition to the claim that institutions influence individuals.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the sociologist’s argument?
The correct answer choice will show that individuals affect the institution or negate the idea that the institution affects individuals.
(A) People acting together in institutions can do more good or evil than can people acting individually.
doesn't clarify the causal relationship.
(B) Institutions formed by people are inevitably imperfect.
mentions no causal relationship
(C) People should not be overly optimistic in their view of individual human beings.
out of scope
(D) A society’s institutions are the surest gauge of that society’s values.
out of scope
(E) The whole does not determine the properties of the things that compose it.
The character of the institution is not an indicator of the character of the individuals that form it.

Kudos [?]: 542 [0], given: 23

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10129

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2016, 05:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Sociologist: Romantics who claim that people are not   [#permalink] 21 Jul 2016, 05:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by