Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Paid vs Free GMAT Resources: "What's Best for You?" This concise guide breaks down the pros and cons of both free and paid study materials, helping you make an informed decision for your GMAT journey.
Sep 0811:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Sep 0811:30 AM EDT
-01:30 PM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Aug 3103:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
For a limited time use code FALL20 to save on prep. Valid on Complete Course, Advanced Course, Bootcamp Course, Tutoring, and the Executive Assessment Course. This discount ends September 16th.
Sep 0705:30 AM PDT
-07:30 AM PDT
Struggling with shuffling between multiple data sets and question choices? With DI scores now equally weighted, learn how to reduce solving time and boost accuracy on these questions through clever data set analysis.
Sep 1211:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.
Sep 1310:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
More and more TTP students are earning impressive scores on the GMAT. Now is the perfect time to join the many GMAT students who made the switch to TTP and surpassed their wildest expectations on test day.
Sep 1308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!- Sep 14
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Text – Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies, Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence, Excel in timed test environment
Solving Complex Problems Using Number Line
[#permalink]
Updated on: 06 May 2015, 23:56
Updated on: 06 May 2015, 23:56
14
Kudos
53
Bookmarks
We are starting this thread to show how we can solve complex divisibility problems and inequalities using the basic properties of a number line.
1: Consecutive numbers and divisibility by 2, 4 and 8:
no. line 1.png [ 27.38 KiB | Viewed 26484 times ]
Few facts to note:
Let's consider a product of any three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2)
Case 1: n is odd:
n(n+1)(n+2) -> odd * even * odd
Takeaway: The product of three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2) is definitely divisible by 2 if n is odd.
Case 2: n is even:
n(n+1)(n+2) -> even * odd * even
n and n+2 are two consecutive even numbers. As we know between two consecutive even numbers, one is divisible by 4 and other is only divisible by 2 and not 4. Hence, n(n+2) will be divisible by 2, 4 and 2*4 =8
Takeaway: The product of three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2) is definitely divisible by 2, 4 and 8 if n is even.
In this case we can also say the last two digits of the product are divisible by 4 (a number is only divisible by 4 if its last two digits are) and the last three digits of the product are divisible by 8 (a number is only divisible by 8 if its last three digits are)
Please bookmark this post and follow PrepTap if you want to receive updates on this topic.
1: Consecutive numbers and divisibility by 2, 4 and 8:
Attachment:
no. line 1.png [ 27.38 KiB | Viewed 26484 times ]
Few facts to note:
- 1. On a number line, odd and even numbers alternate. For example: 1 is odd, 2 is even. So, for any two consecutive number one will be odd and the other even.
2. Between two consecutive even numbers, one will be divisible by 4 and the other will only be divisible by 2 and not by 4.
For example:
2 and 4 -> 2 is not divisible by 4 but 4 is.
4 and 6 -> 4 is divisible by 4 but 6 is not.
Let's consider a product of any three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2)
Case 1: n is odd:
n(n+1)(n+2) -> odd * even * odd
Takeaway: The product of three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2) is definitely divisible by 2 if n is odd.
Case 2: n is even:
n(n+1)(n+2) -> even * odd * even
n and n+2 are two consecutive even numbers. As we know between two consecutive even numbers, one is divisible by 4 and other is only divisible by 2 and not 4. Hence, n(n+2) will be divisible by 2, 4 and 2*4 =8
Takeaway: The product of three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2) is definitely divisible by 2, 4 and 8 if n is even.
In this case we can also say the last two digits of the product are divisible by 4 (a number is only divisible by 4 if its last two digits are) and the last three digits of the product are divisible by 8 (a number is only divisible by 8 if its last three digits are)
Please bookmark this post and follow PrepTap if you want to receive updates on this topic.
Solving Complex Problems Using Number Line
[#permalink]
Updated on: 06 May 2015, 23:57
Updated on: 06 May 2015, 23:57
11
Kudos
19
Bookmarks
2: Consecutive numbers and divisibility by 3 and 6:
On a number line every nth number is divisible by n (n, 2n, 3n….)
No. line muliples of 3.png [ 36.12 KiB | Viewed 26313 times ]
E.g.: Every 3rd number is divisible by 3 (3, 6, 9…)
Every 4th number is divisible by 4 (4, 8, 12..)
As every third number is divisible by 3, any number n on the number line:
-> Is either, divisible by 3 (it is of the form 3k)
-> Or, leaves a remainder 1 when divided by 3 (it is of the form 3k + 1) - in this case n+2 will be divisible by 3
-> Or, leaves a remainder 2 when divided by 3 (it is of the form 3k+2) - in this case n+1 will be divisible by 3
Hence, the product of three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2) will always be divisible by 3.
As discussed in the previous post, the product of three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 2. So, the product of three consecutive numbers will always be divisible by 2*3 = 6 as well.
Takeaway: a product of three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 3 and 6.
We can also say that the sum of the digits of the product is divisible by 3 (a number is only divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3)
Now, let’s consider the product of three numbers of the form:
(n +/- 3k)(n +1 +/- 3l)(n + 2 +/- 3m), where k, l and m are integers.
As you can see, a multiple of three is added to the individual numbers in the product of consecutive integers n(n+1)(n+2).
For example: 4 * 8 * 6
It is of the form (4) * (5 + 3) * (6) - > 3 is added to the middle number in the product of consecutive numbers 4*5*6
(4) * (5 + 3) * (6) = 4 * 5 * 6 + 4 * 3 * 6
This is clearly divisible by 3
(n +/- 3k)(n +1 +/- 3l)(n + 2 +/- 3m) = n(n+1)(n+2) + terms divisible by 3
As the product of three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 3, the above product is divisible by 3.
Takeaway: the product of three numbers of the form (n +/- 3k)(n +1 +/- 3l)(n + 2 +/- 3m) is always divisible by 3.
You can use this property for solving OG 13 PS Question 87
If n is an integer greater than 6, which of the following must be divisible by 3 ?
Option (A) - n(n+1)(n-4) = n(n+1) (n+2 - 6) (as n>6, this product will be positive)
As you can see this product is of the form n(n+1)(n+2 - 3*2)
It is divisible by 3.
Answer: Option (A)
Please bookmark this post and follow PrepTap if you want to receive updates on this topic.
On a number line every nth number is divisible by n (n, 2n, 3n….)
Attachment:
No. line muliples of 3.png [ 36.12 KiB | Viewed 26313 times ]
E.g.: Every 3rd number is divisible by 3 (3, 6, 9…)
Every 4th number is divisible by 4 (4, 8, 12..)
As every third number is divisible by 3, any number n on the number line:
-> Is either, divisible by 3 (it is of the form 3k)
-> Or, leaves a remainder 1 when divided by 3 (it is of the form 3k + 1) - in this case n+2 will be divisible by 3
-> Or, leaves a remainder 2 when divided by 3 (it is of the form 3k+2) - in this case n+1 will be divisible by 3
Hence, the product of three consecutive numbers n(n+1)(n+2) will always be divisible by 3.
As discussed in the previous post, the product of three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 2. So, the product of three consecutive numbers will always be divisible by 2*3 = 6 as well.
Takeaway: a product of three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 3 and 6.
We can also say that the sum of the digits of the product is divisible by 3 (a number is only divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3)
Now, let’s consider the product of three numbers of the form:
(n +/- 3k)(n +1 +/- 3l)(n + 2 +/- 3m), where k, l and m are integers.
As you can see, a multiple of three is added to the individual numbers in the product of consecutive integers n(n+1)(n+2).
For example: 4 * 8 * 6
It is of the form (4) * (5 + 3) * (6) - > 3 is added to the middle number in the product of consecutive numbers 4*5*6
(4) * (5 + 3) * (6) = 4 * 5 * 6 + 4 * 3 * 6
This is clearly divisible by 3
(n +/- 3k)(n +1 +/- 3l)(n + 2 +/- 3m) = n(n+1)(n+2) + terms divisible by 3
As the product of three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 3, the above product is divisible by 3.
Takeaway: the product of three numbers of the form (n +/- 3k)(n +1 +/- 3l)(n + 2 +/- 3m) is always divisible by 3.
You can use this property for solving OG 13 PS Question 87
If n is an integer greater than 6, which of the following must be divisible by 3 ?
- (A) n(n+1)(n-4)
(B) n(n+2)(n-1)
(C) n(n+3)(n-5)
(D) n(n+4)(n-2)
(E) n(n+5)(n-6)
Option (A) - n(n+1)(n-4) = n(n+1) (n+2 - 6) (as n>6, this product will be positive)
As you can see this product is of the form n(n+1)(n+2 - 3*2)
It is divisible by 3.
Answer: Option (A)
Please bookmark this post and follow PrepTap if you want to receive updates on this topic.
Re: Solving Complex Problems Using Number Line
[#permalink]
05 May 2015, 09:51
05 May 2015, 09:51
8
Kudos
10
Bookmarks
4. Absolute Values and the Number Line
On a number line, \(|x-a|\) denotes the distance between x and a irrespective of the signs of x and a.
Case 1: x and a are positive
Let's say x = 1 and a = 3
x and a positive.png [ 15.09 KiB | Viewed 25953 times ]
|x-a| = |1 - 3| = |-2| = 2
The distance remains the same when the values of x and a are swapped.
x and a positive 2.png [ 14.91 KiB | Viewed 25981 times ]
Case 2: x and a are negative
Let's say x = -1 and a = -3
x and a negative.png [ 13.67 KiB | Viewed 25765 times ]
|x-a| = |-1 + 3| = |2| = 2
The distance remains the same when the values of x and a are swapped.
Case 3: x and a have opposite signs
|x - a| won't change as long as the distance between x and a is the same.
x negative a positive.png [ 10.85 KiB | Viewed 25719 times ]
Takeaway: To calculate |x - a|, find out the distance between x and a on the number line, irrespective of the signs of x and a.
Now let's take a look at an inequality involving absolute values using the number line.
|x - a| > |x - b| > |x - c|
All this inequality is saying that the distance between x and a is greater than the distance between x and b, which in turn is greater than the distance between x and c.
This is true whether x, a, b and c are positive, negative or zero.
Therefore, all the arrangements illustrated below are possible where the distances satisfy the inequality above.
x c b a
x c b a.png [ 25.34 KiB | Viewed 25661 times ]
a b c x
a b c x.png [ 26.28 KiB | Viewed 25647 times ]
c x b a
c x b a.png [ 25.62 KiB | Viewed 25625 times ]
a b x c
a b x c.png [ 23.94 KiB | Viewed 25616 times ]
b x c a
b x c a.png [ 25.16 KiB | Viewed 25603 times ]
a c x b
a c x b.png [ 26.47 KiB | Viewed 25606 times ]
It doesn't matter whether a, b, and c are to the left or to the right of x as long as the inequality regarding distances is maintained.
In the arrangement of a, b, c and x, the farthest point from x (namely a) will always be at one of the edges and never in the middle. Think about it and you'll see why this is so.
Also, if b and c are on the same side of x, c will always lie between x and b, i.e. these two arrangements -> c b x a and a x b c are not valid.
Takeaway: An inequality like |x - a| > |x - b| > |x - c| doesn't mean a > b > c or a < b < c. It only means either a < b, c or a > b, c. The relationship between b and c can't be established unless more information is provided.
Please bookmark this post and follow PrepTap if you want to receive updates on this topic.
On a number line, \(|x-a|\) denotes the distance between x and a irrespective of the signs of x and a.
Case 1: x and a are positive
Let's say x = 1 and a = 3
Attachment:
x and a positive.png [ 15.09 KiB | Viewed 25953 times ]
|x-a| = |1 - 3| = |-2| = 2
The distance remains the same when the values of x and a are swapped.
Attachment:
x and a positive 2.png [ 14.91 KiB | Viewed 25981 times ]
Case 2: x and a are negative
Let's say x = -1 and a = -3
Attachment:
x and a negative.png [ 13.67 KiB | Viewed 25765 times ]
|x-a| = |-1 + 3| = |2| = 2
The distance remains the same when the values of x and a are swapped.
Case 3: x and a have opposite signs
|x - a| won't change as long as the distance between x and a is the same.
Attachment:
x negative a positive.png [ 10.85 KiB | Viewed 25719 times ]
Takeaway: To calculate |x - a|, find out the distance between x and a on the number line, irrespective of the signs of x and a.
Now let's take a look at an inequality involving absolute values using the number line.
|x - a| > |x - b| > |x - c|
All this inequality is saying that the distance between x and a is greater than the distance between x and b, which in turn is greater than the distance between x and c.
This is true whether x, a, b and c are positive, negative or zero.
Therefore, all the arrangements illustrated below are possible where the distances satisfy the inequality above.
x c b a
Attachment:
x c b a.png [ 25.34 KiB | Viewed 25661 times ]
a b c x
Attachment:
a b c x.png [ 26.28 KiB | Viewed 25647 times ]
c x b a
Attachment:
c x b a.png [ 25.62 KiB | Viewed 25625 times ]
a b x c
Attachment:
a b x c.png [ 23.94 KiB | Viewed 25616 times ]
b x c a
Attachment:
b x c a.png [ 25.16 KiB | Viewed 25603 times ]
a c x b
Attachment:
a c x b.png [ 26.47 KiB | Viewed 25606 times ]
It doesn't matter whether a, b, and c are to the left or to the right of x as long as the inequality regarding distances is maintained.
In the arrangement of a, b, c and x, the farthest point from x (namely a) will always be at one of the edges and never in the middle. Think about it and you'll see why this is so.
Also, if b and c are on the same side of x, c will always lie between x and b, i.e. these two arrangements -> c b x a and a x b c are not valid.
Takeaway: An inequality like |x - a| > |x - b| > |x - c| doesn't mean a > b > c or a < b < c. It only means either a < b, c or a > b, c. The relationship between b and c can't be established unless more information is provided.
Please bookmark this post and follow PrepTap if you want to receive updates on this topic.
