Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 10:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 2

Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2009, 19:03
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (02:04) correct 25% (01:42) wrong based on 916 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

(A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
(B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
(C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
(D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
(E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2009, 19:43
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
[Hold it]
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
[This is already taken into account . NEGATING it does not fail the conclusion]
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
[Not possible, since if oil is not an energy source, conclusion is still valid]
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
[Out of scope- also even if future consumption grows its ok]
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
[Out of scope]

Clear A.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 416
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 394 [1] , given: 14

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2009, 22:29
1
KUDOS
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before

I got this question from other forum and everybody is debating on OA....I also feel OA is wrong...can we discuss this question here?
Appreciate your help (managerial talks )

They key word here is "From this" we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries.

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 279
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2009, 22:41
ConkergMat wrote:
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
[Hold it]
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
[This is already taken into account . NEGATING it does not fail the conclusion]
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
[Not possible, since if oil is not an energy source, conclusion is still valid]
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
[Out of scope- also even if future consumption grows its ok]
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
[Out of scope]

Clear A.

I also agree with A
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 104
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2009, 22:52
Its indeed A.
But would be interested to know why other people think why A could not be the answer.
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 242
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2009, 23:10
I might be the only one, but I think the answer is E.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 277
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2009, 00:05
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before

I got this question from other forum and everybody is debating on OA....I also feel OA is wrong...can we discuss this question here?
Appreciate your help (managerial talks )

I also think it's A.
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2009, 07:33
Anwer is B....I don't understand the reason behind it
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 242
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2009, 07:58
Answer is B....I don't understand the reason behind it

I don't see how it can be B - what is the source?
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1409
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 388 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2009, 09:01
it cant be B as the Q says even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

B is contradicting what the Q already assumes. Both of them are not needed right?

Do the negation test and A wins hands down
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 431
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 73 [1] , given: 4

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2009, 20:09
1
KUDOS
Impossible for B to be OA

Agree with A

Cheers,
Unplugged
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 547
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2009, 20:19
Source - http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-critica ... ct-oa.html
peraspera wrote:
Answer is B....I don't understand the reason behind it

I don't see how it can be B - what is the source?
Senior Manager
Status: Yeah well whatever.
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 343
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE: Analyst (Insurance)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 17

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2009, 07:59
Both A and B must be assumed. Who wrote this stupid question? A must be assumed because without it they can’t meet the need. B must be assumed because the language of the passage literally says it is assumed for the conclusion. But what kind of question has two right answers? A) a stupid one or B) a trick one… you choose.
_________________

He that is in me > he that is in the world. - source 1 John 4:4

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 384
Location: United States (NY)
Schools: Columbia - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V43
GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V45
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 64

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2009, 08:46
I usually hate it when people argue the OA, but in this case I must join the ranks! The answer appears to be a clear A.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 169
Location: Streamwood IL
Schools: Kellogg(Evening),Booth (Evening)
WE 1: 5 Years
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 184 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2009, 09:27
A for sure. B would be the first choice I would eliminate .
_________________

Rock On

Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2009, 21:30
even I went for A.
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2009, 21:45
The whole argument is dependent on RESERVE of oil. Even future generation will be able to use for next 5 or 10 centuries if there is reserve for oil.
So if there is reserve of oil but we are not able to drill it, then whats the use of that reserve. This clearly states that the correct answer.

Ans: A (200%)
Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2009, 09:45
This one is not really difficult, the OA is just wrong, the correct answer is A,
E is going to far, we haven't engouh information from the stimulus.
Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 876
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 891 [0], given: 33

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2009, 23:32
A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2008
Posts: 58
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2009, 17:41
my choice is A. Can someone explain why ans B is correct?
Re: CR: Oil rate   [#permalink] 25 Dec 2009, 17:41

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 42 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical 10 06 Nov 2016, 23:48
2 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled 10 21 Mar 2012, 04:48
1 Smith argued that recreational equipment owned in common by 9 16 Sep 2014, 11:13
4 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical 10 05 Jun 2015, 14:40
2 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical 10 24 Mar 2017, 14:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by