GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 21 Apr 2018, 18:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 113
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2015, 06:25
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

77% (01:00) correct 23% (00:53) wrong based on 244 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn about the structure of the earliest organic life. A flaw in this strategy is that bacteria are extremely varied. Indeed, any bacterium alive today is at the tail end of a long evolutionary process and has undergone considerable change since the earliest organic life appeared on Earth.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism above of the microbiologists’ strategy?

A. All bacteria throughout evolutionary history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other kinds of organisms.
B. Most ancient strains of bacteria either became extinct or adapted to changing environmental conditions.
C. All microbiologists study one kind or another of organic life.
D. Many microbiologists who study today’s bacteria do not draw inferences about the origins of organic life on the basis of their studies.
E. Even those strains of bacteria that have not significantly evolved in millions of years are importantly different from the first strains of bacteria that appeared on Earth.


Can someone explain me A and D options.
In A even if bacteria had common features, we are told that they have evolved and we are not sure whether they have common features today or not.

So, i chose best out of worst option D. I Thought if scientist are not drawing inferences then we cant find flaw in their strategies.

can anyone explain please.
Thanks
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 318
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Re: Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2015, 07:12
3
This post received
KUDOS
rukna wrote:
Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn about the structure of the earliest organic life. A flaw in this strategy is that bacteria are extremely varied. Indeed, any bacterium alive today is at the tail end of a long evolutionary process and has undergone considerable change since the earliest organic life appeared on Earth.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism above of the microbiologists’ strategy?

A. All bacteria throughout evolutionary history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other kinds of organisms.
B. Most ancient strains of bacteria either became extinct or adapted to changing environmental conditions.
C. All microbiologists study one kind or another of organic life.
D. Many microbiologists who study today’s bacteria do not draw inferences about the origins of organic life on the basis of their studies.
E. Even those strains of bacteria that have not significantly evolved in millions of years are importantly different from the first strains of bacteria that appeared on Earth.


Can someone explain me A and D options.
In A even if bacteria had common features, we are told that they have evolved and we are not sure whether they have common features today or not.

So, i chose best out of worst option D. I Thought if scientist are not drawing inferences then we cant find flaw in their strategies.

can anyone explain please.
Thanks



This question mimics OG 13 Question 43.It is a copy-cat version of the same.

The argument says that the bacteria have undergone CONSIDERABLE change BUT does not say that they have COMPLETELY changed.

Simply put,Option A says that there are some common features left which have not changed.If there are common features, then it really makes sense to study the present bacteria.

Option D is not correct because even if it were true, it will not weaken the argument. The argument does not say that the Microbiologist study the bacteria to find out about the origins of life but only about the structure of the earliest organic life. The microbiologist may know that they can not study these bacteria wrt the origin of life because the bacteria have changed. But this option is not relevant to the study of the structure of the earliest life forms.

Beware of such traps which sound similar but are actually out of scope.

Hope the above helps.

I do not mind Kudos.!!!!! :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 113
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Re: Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2015, 07:38
samichange wrote:
rukna wrote:
Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn about the structure of the earliest organic life. A flaw in this strategy is that bacteria are extremely varied. Indeed, any bacterium alive today is at the tail end of a long evolutionary process and has undergone considerable change since the earliest organic life appeared on Earth.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism above of the microbiologists’ strategy?

A. All bacteria throughout evolutionary history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other kinds of organisms.
B. Most ancient strains of bacteria either became extinct or adapted to changing environmental conditions.
C. All microbiologists study one kind or another of organic life.
D. Many microbiologists who study today’s bacteria do not draw inferences about the origins of organic life on the basis of their studies.
E. Even those strains of bacteria that have not significantly evolved in millions of years are importantly different from the first strains of bacteria that appeared on Earth.


Can someone explain me A and D options.
In A even if bacteria had common features, we are told that they have evolved and we are not sure whether they have common features today or not.

So, i chose best out of worst option D. I Thought if scientist are not drawing inferences then we cant find flaw in their strategies.

can anyone explain please.
Thanks



This question mimics OG 13 Question 43.It is a copy-cat version of the same.

The argument says that the bacteria have undergone CONSIDERABLE change BUT does not say that they have COMPLETELY changed.

Simply put,Option A says that there are some common features left which have not changed.If there are common features, then it really makes sense to study the present bacteria.

Option D is not correct because even if it were true, it will not weaken the argument. The argument does not say that the Microbiologist study the bacteria to find out about the origins of life but only about the structure of the earliest organic life. The microbiologist may know that they can not study these bacteria wrt the origin of life because the bacteria have changed. But this option is not relevant to the study of the structure of the earliest life forms.

Beware of such traps which sound similar but are actually out of scope.

Hope the above helps.

I do not mind Kudos.!!!!! :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D



Thanks.
One last point, The option A doesnt say that there are some common features left which have not changed.

I am not sure about this. I dont know whether they have any common features left now or not. It just says that they had common features. This is same confusion I had while answering this question in exam :(
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 318
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Re: Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2015, 08:18
rukna wrote:

Thanks.
One last point, The option A doesnt say that there are some common features left which have not changed.

I am not sure about this. I dont know whether they have any common features left now or not. It just says that they had common features. This is same confusion I had while answering this question in exam :(


Option A- All bacteria throughout evolutionary history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other kinds of organisms.

If there are some features that have been common throughout the evolutionary history , it means that these features have not changed and so the microbiologists can study the modern/recently evolved bacteria and find out/learn something about the old ones.

I would recommend you to go through the OE Of OG 13 Q 43.
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2015
Posts: 13
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2015, 00:12
A is the best answer as we have to find the flaw in the criticism and not in the strategy of microbiologists.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 74
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2017, 03:40
It would be nice if no comments on right or wrong answers would be posted along the gmat questions, it makes the user unconsciously pick an answer based on those comments.
_________________

GMAT loosers are born not made !!!

Re: Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a   [#permalink] 23 Dec 2017, 03:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some microbiologists study bacteria in an effort to learn a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.