GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 23 Sep 2019, 02:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1350
Location: Malaysia
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 05 Jun 2017, 20:37
2
4
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:11) correct 30% (01:24) wrong based on 343 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been built by the community’s earliest settlers.

(A) Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(B) Some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(C) Some of the homes that the fire destroyed and structurally compromised last year have been
(D) Last year the fire destroyed or structurally compromised some of the homes that have been
(E) Last year some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire had been

This question was modified from The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review [LINK]

_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Originally posted by hazelnut on 31 Jan 2017, 04:17.
Last edited by hazelnut on 05 Jun 2017, 20:37, edited 2 times in total.
Underlined Relevant Part of the sentence
Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4942
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2017, 04:56
3
Top Contributor
1
The OA is B in the official topic. In the given topic also, the answer is B.
1. Logically, a catastrophe can either destroy a house or heavily compromise the structure. It can't do both. Hence, the conjunction "and" turns inappropriate. That is the reason choices A and C are out.
2. Use of 'have been' for the construction that happened much before the fire and its impact is untenable. Hence, D is out
3. The fire occurred last year. Hence, fire and last year should go hand-in-hand. E is wrong for that misplaced word order.
_________________
If you can't sync with the vibe of GMAT, you had better think!!!
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2016
Posts: 32
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q45 V25
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2017, 05:09
1
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been built by the community’s earliest settlers.

(A) Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(B) Some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire last year had been correct
(C) Some of the homes that the fire destroyed and structurally compromised last year have been
(D) Last year the fire destroyed or structurally compromised some of the homes that have been
(E) Last year some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire had been. starting the sentence with "last year" changes the intended meaning of the sentence.
Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4714
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2017, 09:32
1
Similar OG question to practice will be -

https://gmatclub.com/forum/some-buildin ... fl=similar
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1350
Location: Malaysia
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2017, 20:47
1
ziyuenlau wrote:
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been built by the community’s earliest settlers.

(A) Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(B) Some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(C) Some of the homes that the fire destroyed and structurally compromised last year have been
(D) Last year the fire destroyed or structurally compromised some of the homes that have been
(E) Last year some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire had been

Official solution from Veritas Prep.

In this problem, notice the function of the phrase “Last year” to set up a time line. It is illogical that, all in the last year, the earliest settlers to the community built houses and those houses were subsequently destroyed in a fire. Answer choices D and E, just by leading with that entire-sentence modifier “Last year,” begin to fail the logical time line test. And answer choices C and D both use the ongoing tense “have been,” putting the building of the homes (by early settlers, nonetheless) after the fire that burned them down! That time line is even more nonsensical. Only answer choices A and B construct a logical time line using the phrasing:

The homes were ruined in the fire and the homes had been built by early settlers.

So what’s the difference? Verb tense conveys meaning but so do conjunctions (more to come on this in the Sentence Construction section!). Does it make sense to say that a home can be both destroyed and structurally compromised? If it is destroyed, then it is necessarily compromised, so the conjunction must be “or.” The correct answer choice is B.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Intern
Status: Enjoying the Journey
Affiliations: Toronto
Joined: 08 Jan 2017
Posts: 23
ND: SS
Schools: Rotman '21
WE: Marketing (Consulting)
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2017, 03:06
1
hazelnut wrote:
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been built by the community’s earliest settlers.

(A) Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(B) Some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire last year had been
(C) Some of the homes that the fire destroyed and structurally compromised last year have been
(D) Last year the fire destroyed or structurally compromised some of the homes that have been
(E) Last year some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire had been

This question was modified from The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review [LINK]

This was a tricky one for me, I chose A instead of B because I didn't pay enough attention to the meaning of the sentence
_________________
High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation Charles Kettering
If we chase perfection we can catch excellence Vince Lombardi

Using Forum Tags: https://gmatclub.com/forum/using-forum-tags-158411.html#p1909410
Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 32
GMAT 1: 580 Q36 V32
GMAT 2: 660 Q39 V41
GRE 1: Q159 V160
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2017, 18:12
This Almost sounds like a jump in logic, changing the conjunction to or, doesn't that change the entire meaning of the sentence? Why is it completely illogical to think that a fire can both destroy and undermine the structure of the building?

Posted from my mobile device
CEO
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3039
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2017, 22:48
Mco100 wrote:
This Almost sounds like a jump in logic, changing the conjunction to or, doesn't that change the entire meaning of the sentence? Why is it completely illogical to think that a fire can both destroy and undermine the structure of the building?
This question is based on this official question. In the destroyed/damaged question, the GMAT wants you to take a meaning call (by the way, this is not the only question in which they've tested the and/or split). They're referring to two types of buildings: (a) the ones that were destroyed and (b) the ones that were damaged (but not destroyed). They're not referring to a sequence of events with something like the buildings that were damaged and (later) destroyed, so it's very hard to argue that a building can be both destroyed and damaged.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 May 2017
Posts: 281
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Re: Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2017, 19:38
Mco100 wrote:
This Almost sounds like a jump in logic, changing the conjunction to or, doesn't that change the entire meaning of the sentence? Why is it completely illogical to think that a fire can both destroy and undermine the structure of the building?

Posted from my mobile device

In this option, the conjunction OR changes the meaning.
Let's take a simple example - Which of option is incorrect?
X AND Y would come.
X OR Y would come.

Grammatically, both options are correct. But either option may become incorrect depending upon the intent of the author.
X AND Y would come. - This would be incorrect, if the author wants EITHER ONE to come.
X OR Y would come. - This would be incorrect, if the author wants BOTH to come.

_________________
If you like the post, show appreciation by pressing Kudos button
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2017
Posts: 134
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 3.1
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2018, 09:10
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been built by the community’s earliest settlers.

(A) Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in the fire last year had been - The word "and" seems weird, my thought, "if in a fire, it should be either destroyed OR structurally compromised. eliminate.
(B) Some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire last year had been - seems right lets keep
(C) Some of the homes that the fire destroyed and structurally compromised last year have been - wrong usage of "have been"
(D) Last year the fire destroyed or structurally compromised some of the homes that have been - wrong usage of "have been"
(E) Last year some of the homes that were destroyed or structurally compromised in the fire had been - does not make sense and B is more concise
Some of the homes that were destroyed and structurally compromised in   [#permalink] 06 Dec 2018, 09:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by