It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 05:21

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 485

Kudos [?]: 2328 [0], given: 82

Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2013, 09:23
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (00:42) correct 26% (01:02) wrong based on 131 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong.

(A) its legal definition is someone who is unable
(B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable
(C) it is legally defined as the inability
(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability
(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Kudos [?]: 2328 [0], given: 82

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 56

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2013, 09:31
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong.

(A) its legal definition is someone who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(C) it is legally defined as the inability-wordy
(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability-Correct
(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable - Pronoun must be singular

Please correct me if I am going wrong somewhere........................

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 56

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 485

Kudos [?]: 2328 [2], given: 82

Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 07:10
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
prasannajeet wrote:
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong.

(A) its legal definition is someone who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(C) it is legally defined as the inability-wordy
(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability-Correct
(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable - Pronoun must be singular

Please correct me if I am going wrong somewhere........................

Yes prasannajeet, you are correct. In GMAT if you see an underlined part starting with a pronoun, it is highly probable that the sentence is testing pronoun issues.

As far as the explanation is concerned

(A) contains a meaning error "its legal definition is someone" the definition can not be someone.
(E) Clearly contains a pronoun number error.

Choices (B), (C) and (D) are not exactly grammatically incorrect, however (D) conveys the meaning without any ambiguity and hence the correct answer choice.

Both (B) and (C) have the ambiguous pronoun "its".

Vercules
_________________

Kudos [?]: 2328 [2], given: 82

Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2011
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 8

Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2013, 06:59
Is there a significance to the semicolon here. Is that a reason for the second independent clause to have the 'insanity' explicitly mentioned?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 8

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 485

Kudos [?]: 2328 [0], given: 82

Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2013, 08:29
ramanujanu wrote:
Is there a significance to the semicolon here. Is that a reason for the second independent clause to have the 'insanity' explicitly mentioned?

Hi ramanujanu,

The word "insanity" is used in the second clause to remove any pronoun reference ambiguity. The importance of the semicolon is not very significant in this question. If we use "it" in the second clause then "it" will have no clear antecedent. In the first clause the word "insane" (an adjective) is used; however a pronoun "it" can not refer to an adjective. That's why we have to explicitly mention "insanity" (a noun) in the second clause.

Hope that helps,

Vercules
_________________

Kudos [?]: 2328 [0], given: 82

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2013, 20:47
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong.

(A) its legal definition is someone who is unableIts should logically refer to Insane but the subject of previous clause is "a Person"
(B) legally, it refers to a person who is unablePronoun error
(C) it is legally defined as the inability Pronoun error
(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inabilityCorrect
(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable..It changes the meaning
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 75

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10181

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 17:33
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 1474

Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2014, 08:14
Hi Guys

I cant really follow whats the pronoun issue with B ? Is the "it" not "referring" to "insane"? Please guide

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 1474

Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2014, 08:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.