It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 04:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: sydney
Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 01:03
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (01:51) correct 25% (01:34) wrong based on 50 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of the human form in religious art. In particular, the representation of divine personages with human characteristics is seen as demeaning to those who do not share the gender, racial, ethnic, age or other human characteristics portrayed in the representations of divine personages.
Which of the following, if true, would constitute a logical challenge to the validity of these concerns?

A) Religious traditions are emotional and not logical.

B) Religious art without the human form is meaningless.

C) Research has failed to find anyone who shows evidence of being demeaned by representation of divine personages.

D) Most religions do not oppose the representation of the human form.

E) All people are equal in the eyes of God.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 02:18
agree with E. It perfectly weakens the agrument.

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: MI
Re: CR: religious traditions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 08:40
mbamantra wrote:
Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of the human form in religious art. In particular, the representation of divine personages with human characteristics is seen as demeaning to those who do not share the gender, racial, ethnic, age or other human characteristics portrayed in the representations of divine personages.
Which of the following, if true, would constitute a logical challenge to the validity of these concerns?

A) Religious traditions are emotional and not logical.

B) Religious art without the human form is meaningless.

C) Research has failed to find anyone who shows evidence of being demeaned by representation of divine personages.

D) Most religions do not oppose the representation of the human form.

E) All people are equal in the eyes of God.

I think A.

E does not give a reason why the representation of the human form in religious art should not be seen as demeaning.
In fact, if all people are equal in the eyes of God, then representation in human form should be seen as demeaning.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 247

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 08:56
C

A Let them be emotional and illogical .. who cares? that is not the point raised in the argument.
B - be it meaningless or meaningful, the religious traditions will still oppose
D - 'representation of human form' in what??
E - equal or not equal in the eyes of God ... who cares? (meaning in the context of the argument). God does not come into picture and is out of scope

C - is not very strong but I feel is best among the choices. Not strong because even if the people show no evidence they may still be feeling so. Also no details about the research are given here ... o wait! I think that is an AWA point not a CR point!! he he ....

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Aus

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 13:33
I feel B will challege the validity than the other options.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: MI

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 16:09
Only D is left out...com'n someone go for D...

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 04 Oct 2003
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Silicon Valley, CA
C is more crisp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2003, 21:58
Ans - C

C attacks the main argument in the stem. During practice using Kaplan, I came to conclusion that the correct ans must directly attack the premise in the statement. This is a very good example of the confusion put in form of out of scope choices

Eg consider B. This choice is so logically linked to the stem. But this choice broadens the scope of argument. C on the other hand attacks what is put forth as the stem. Many a times it is a close paraphrase of the stem itself. So if the basic concern of being demeaning is eliminated, the argument looses it validity.

That is how I analyzed the question. Please feel free to comment on it.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: sydney

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2003, 02:09
Kaplan also says that choices should be in the scope of the original argument. What if researchers FAILED to find , i mean though evidence exists but they FAILED to find. if i go by Kaplan's methodology choice C is out of scope.

By the way official ans is C and this question is from 8000score.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 330

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 291

Re: Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2013, 23:04
Clearly C is the only answer that logically weakens the argument. The rest are either out of scope or illogical.

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 291

Current Student
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 262

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 23

Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2016, 03:54
mbamantra wrote:
Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of the human form in religious art. In particular, the representation of divine personages with human characteristics is seen as demeaning to those who do not share the gender, racial, ethnic, age or other human characteristics portrayed in the representations of divine personages.
Which of the following, if true, would constitute a logical challenge to the validity of these concerns?

A) Religious traditions are emotional and not logical.

B) Religious art without the human form is meaningless.

C) Research has failed to find anyone who shows evidence of being demeaned by representation of divine personages.

D) Most religions do not oppose the representation of the human form.

E) All people are equal in the eyes of God.

Stem : Representation of divine art in human form is demeaning to those who do not share particular characteristics.

But what if there is nobody who actually feels bad... this breaks the entire argument. You are saying A because of B. But if B is not proven to exist, can A be true?

C attacks this logic.

C.
_________________

Kudos if I helped

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 23

Re: Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2016, 03:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Some religious traditions have opposed the representation of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.