It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 15:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Source: Knewton. With no policy restricting the number of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 54

Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Source: Knewton. With no policy restricting the number of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 14:15
13
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

27% (01:40) correct 73% (01:40) wrong based on 649 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Source: Knewton.

With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have grown by 150 million people over the last sixty years.

(A) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have
(B) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials’ estimate of the population in the United States has
(C) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, the United States' population, Census Bureau officials estimate, has
(D) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and the elderly provided with care in nursing homes, the United States has a population that Census Bureau officials estimate to have
(E) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, Census Bureau officials estimate that the United States' population has

Updated with OA. Explanation in a post below.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Last edited by martie11 on 02 Dec 2010, 07:18, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 54

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 952 [1], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 00:56
1
KUDOS
With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have grown by 150 million people over the last sixty years.

(A) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have - must be has , the population has grown
(B) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials’ estimate of the population in the United States has - wrong modifier starting with no policy , modifies estimate of Census Bureau officials, so estimate does not have policies.
(C) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, the United States' population, Census Bureau officials estimate, has -wrong modifier starting with no policy , modifies population of the United States, so population does not have policies.
(D) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and the elderly provided with care in nursing homes, the United States has a population that Census Bureau officials estimate to have - must be has , the population has grown
(E) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, Census Bureau officials estimate that the United States' population has - correct Census Bureau officials are without a policy, and "population has grown"
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 952 [1], given: 621

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 952 [0], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 01:04
vigneshpandi wrote:
IMO E...
Whats the OA?

why E? prove it !
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 952 [0], given: 621

Ms. Big Fat Panda
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1915

Kudos [?]: 2205 [0], given: 210

Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 01:36
There seems to be a conflict of meaning. You might want to ask yourself:

1. If the sentence is saying there's no restriction on (number of children) + (nursing homes providing care)

OR

2. If the sentence is saying no restriction on babies + there are nursing homes that provide care.

If we are to go with the second meaning, then the answer is E. But I'm still undecided. OA?

Kudos [?]: 2205 [0], given: 210

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7917 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 03:28
As per norms of modification, the United States is supposed to have no restriction on the number of children and also the nursing homes that nurse the elderly. Any other noun such as Census Bureau officials in A and E, the Census Bureau officials’ estimate in B, the United States' population in C are all wrong. The obvious answer is D. Compared to this significant point, others turn trivial. If D is the answer then it must be that the officials estimate the population “to have grown” also is acceptable over its alternative - “population has grown”.

But between ‘has grown’ and ‘to have grown’, - has grown is categorical and hence does not have the essence of approximation that is inherent in estimation. On the contrary ‘to have grown’ has some uncertainty built around it and can therefore be the right accompaniment for the verb ‘estimate’. But before that modification is important.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7917 [0], given: 364

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 20

Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 03:38
Think it should be D. The others seem to have modifier problems. Only d has "united states" right after the comma, relating back to "without a policy restricting+elderly provided..."

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 20

Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 153 [4], given: 54

Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 07:16
4
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi all...thanks for your participation...this is great to see!

Looks like all of you were fooled...unless OA is incorrect? Here is the Knewton explanation:
Attachments

Screen shot 2010-12-02 at 9.19.14 AM.png [ 88.48 KiB | Viewed 4714 times ]

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Kudos [?]: 153 [4], given: 54

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7917 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 09:44
i thought a population has people. Now I understand it has policies too. Great going.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7917 [0], given: 364

Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 54

Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2010, 09:56
daagh wrote:
i thought a population has people. No I understand it also policies too. Great going.

Nice to finally find one that you found challenging
_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 54

Senior Manager
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 261

Kudos [?]: 1227 [0], given: 48

Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2011, 04:51
'nusring homes that provide' .. wait, nursing homes can't provide care. this can't be correct.

'with no policy' is a better expression than 'without a policy'. moreover, AND indicates parallelism, so both sides should be structurally and logically parallel.

'with no policy ... AND with nursing homes' .. are both logically parallel.
_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts

Kudos [?]: 1227 [0], given: 48

Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 15

GMAT Date: 10-21-2011
Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2011, 00:34
Quote:
With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have grown by 150 million people over the last sixty years.

(A) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have
(B) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials’ estimate of the population in the United States has
(C) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, the United States' population, Census Bureau officials estimate, has
(D) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and the elderly provided with care in nursing homes, the United States has a population that Census Bureau officials estimate to have
(E) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, Census Bureau officials estimate that the United States' population has

went with E, initially.
further close reading uncovers the following:-

2 ways to deal with:

1.
* 'population...have' - wrong. Should be 'population...has' - eliminates A and D
* Parallelism: "with [something] and with [something else]" - eliminates E
* Modifier - 'With no policy...' should modify 'United States' population and not modify Census Bureau. ---> So we take C over B.

2.
* Modifier - who is the modifier (front portion) pertaining to? United States population or Census Bureau? ---> United States population. So, eliminates A, B and E, leaving us C and D.
* Parallelism - it should be 'With [something] and with [something else]' ---> we eliminate D, thus arriving at answer C.
_________________

"The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours - it is an amazing journey - and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins." - Bob Moawab

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 15

Re: Tough Parallel Clauses - SC [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2011, 01:06
I also think its E. OA is not clear enough

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 15

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2604

Kudos [?]: 395 [0], given: 184

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Source: Knewton. With no policy restricting the number of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2015, 19:42
tough one, any expert to comment on this one?

Kudos [?]: 395 [0], given: 184

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7917 [1], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Source: Knewton. With no policy restricting the number of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2015, 21:54
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have grown by 150 million people over the last sixty years.

(A) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials estimate the United States' population to have
(B) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes that provide care for the elderly, Census Bureau officials’ estimate of the population in the United States has
(C) With no policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, the United States' population, Census Bureau officials estimate, has
(D) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and the elderly provided with care in nursing homes, the United States has a population that Census Bureau officials estimate to have
(E) Without a policy restricting the number of children a family can have and with nursing homes where the elderly are provided with care, Census Bureau officials estimate that the United States' population has

As per norms of modification, the introductory modifier, “With no policy …….that care for the elderly” must modify the US population. So A, B and E are dropped. In D, the problem is the opposite meaning the choice means after dropping the preposition ‘with’ before the elderly, as it would now mean that the elderly are not provided any care in the nursing homes. Therefore, by elimination finally, C remains.

Incidentally, one can see a GMAT Prep question that is on similar lines.

With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have

B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has

C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanse of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have

E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

The OA is C
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7917 [1], given: 364

VP
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1185

Kudos [?]: 899 [0], given: 54

Location: Viet Nam
Re: Source: Knewton. With no policy restricting the number of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2016, 03:36
This is a tough one for me. I went to choice E, but it seems clearer that "with no policy" modifies "US population"
_________________

Kudos [?]: 899 [0], given: 54

Re: Source: Knewton. With no policy restricting the number of   [#permalink] 31 Oct 2016, 03:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by