It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 05:20

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Spending on research and development by United States

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Spending on research and development by United States [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2005, 19:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981- when outlays for research and development increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

A. Business spending for research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.
B. Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.
C. Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.
D. In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development would not have been substantially lower than it was.
E. Tax credits marked for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Research and dev. [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2005, 20:05
D. explain later.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 1

Location: USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2005, 02:53
Very clearly D.

First off, eliminate A, B and C as they are irrelevant.

While E seems convincing at first, there is still this remote possibility that businesses can be induced into investing in a specific area due to tax credits

D explains it all. If D were true, it means that if tax credits were not offered, then the R&D spending would have been higher. D it is.

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2005, 03:12
agree with D

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2005, 03:34
D should be it.

Only good choices are C and D.

C says, the tax credit did help because if the the increase would have been more, RD spending would had shown an increase upward. This actually strengthens the argument, saying that tax Credit did contribute.

D says, even without the Tax Cut factor, the increase would had been same, which is what the conclusion of the argument is.

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2005, 07:37
agree with D

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 477

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2005, 15:52
agree with D.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2005, 20:32
OA is D

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 09 Aug 2005, 20:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Spending on research and development by United States

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.