Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 26 May 2017, 18:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

NUS Thread Master
User avatar
Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 124
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 37

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2014, 06:50
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:15) correct 43% (01:29) wrong based on 2676 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

gmatbull wrote:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms
are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street
corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone,
these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we
propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the
proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from.

B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately
five million dollars annually.

C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information
about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.

D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s
capacity for responding to fires.

E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones
in Springfield are out of service.

Please, provide explanations for your response. OA to follow later.



got it wrong though , now i understand OA is A

"A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from."

Because conclusion was that they can now receive calls from private phones.. and option A suggest that they are able to receive and process each and every private call.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Posts: 106
Concentration: Marketing
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [1] , given: 66

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2014, 16:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?
The stimulus is a strengthen question. We need to find out what supports the conclusion of the fire commissioner.

His conclusion: Removing the call boxes will reduce the number of prank phone calls without interfering with fire reports.
His premise: Majority of false fire alarms are pranks from anonymous people. Everyone has a private telephone.

So to support the stimulus we need to find an answer choice that will demonstrate why removing the boxes will reduce prank phone calls.


A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from. If the anonymity of the call boxes is what promotes people to make prank phone calls then this is an ideal answer choice. If you remove the anonymity then there will be less prank calls.

B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately five million dollars annually.
The costs is irrelevant to the prank phone calls made from call boxes.

C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.
The ability to report more info about a fire is also irrelevant to reducing prank phone calls through the call boxes.

D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
This answer choice involves how to deal with false alarms but it does not discuss how to deal with reducing them.

E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.
Still irrelevant to reducing prank phone calls.
Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
S
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2678
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 111

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 324

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2015, 04:41
guhabhishek wrote:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?



Powerscore CR Bible states for Strengthens Questions suing the following steps -

1. Identify the conclusion - Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes.
2. Personalize the argument - Removing the alarm boxes will reduce prank calls , however the fire incidents are reported by private telephones.
3. Look for weakness in the argument - Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls but it will hamper people’s ability to report a fire.

Now check the options -

4. Argument of analogy/surveys - strengthen the analogy
5. Correct argument will strengthen the argument just a Little / Lot


Quote:
(A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from
(B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately $5 million annually.
(C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
(D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
(E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.



The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and( false alarm calls can be reduced) records where they came from ( Functions as an alarm Box)


Hence correct Answer is (A)

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 19
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 18

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2015, 09:29
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Conclusion : To remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Analysis
(A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they
came from. - Correct Since easily track location of the fire and caller. So prank calls will be reduced.
(B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately $5 million annually. - Out of scopre :Argument does not talk about operating cost
(C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire
than can an alarm placed from an alarm box. - A telephone call can not be considered as fire alarm call
(D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires. - Weakens the conclusion
(E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.- Irrelevant

Hence A is the best choice !
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 439
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 18

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2017, 17:53
(A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they
came from.
Correct answer
(B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately $5 million annually.
out of scope since there is no mention of the financial aspect of the plan
(C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire
than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
out of scope since calls can still be made with many phones available
(D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
does effect the plan and the reasoning but the plan does not solely depend on the point and this does not directly support the argument.
(E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.
out of scope
Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 515

Kudos [?]: 2273 [0], given: 22

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2017, 21:52
sleepynut wrote:
Hi expert,
The conclusion is the proposal to removal fire alarm boxes.Removing such boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people's ability to report a fire.

I could hardly eliminate option C.In my 2 cents,option C ensures that removing such boxes won't cause any difficulties to report a fire;hence it is a good contender.Option A is also another good contender;it states that fire department can trace the call;hence,the department can somehow limit the false alarm,if any, from telephone as it can directly get to the culprit.

Could you please share your thoughts for these 2 options?
Thanks :-)


The argument is about reporting of genuine fire incidents. How much information about a particular fire is reported is not relevant. The correct option should highlight an advantage of the phones over the alarm boxes in reducing the number of anonymous prank calls, not in any other aspect (such as more information). Hence option A is better than option C.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2017, 09:15
Hi,
I didn't get the meaning of "there is still possibility that the only person aware that a fire has started near an alarm box but lacks access to a telephone. " in the answer of OG for C. Is there any further explanation?

Thanks a million~
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 18

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2017, 23:30
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms
are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street
corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone,
these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we
propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the
proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from.

B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately
five million dollars annually.

C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information
about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.

D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s
capacity for responding to fires.

E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones
in Springfield are out of service.


My 2 cents.
I think most people will get down to A and D.
D is wrong because the issue is not false alarms but prank calls and it does not touch upon how this plan will reduce prank call without hampering people's ability to report fire.

Hence A.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 5

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2017, 10:12
Jez0612 wrote:
Hi,
I didn't get the meaning of "there is still possibility that the only person aware that a fire has started near an alarm box but lacks access to a telephone. " in the answer of OG for C. Is there any further explanation?

Thanks a million~

This is an excerpt from official option E , which weakens the claim mentioned in the passage. To weaken the claim, our reasoning should focus on proving that removal of fire alarm boxes must not take place. So, as per the situation given, if there is a fire in an area and public telephones aren't functional, then how would a witnessee inform the fire department if he doesn't have a personal phone? So this option is suggestive of rejecting the proposal of removing fire alarm boxes and rely on private telephones. Hence weakens the claim.

sayantanc2k wrote:
sleepynut wrote:
Hi expert,
The conclusion is the proposal to removal fire alarm boxes.Removing such boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people's ability to report a fire.

I could hardly eliminate option C.In my 2 cents,option C ensures that removing such boxes won't cause any difficulties to report a fire;hence it is a good contender.Option A is also another good contender;it states that fire department can trace the call;hence,the department can somehow limit the false alarm,if any, from telephone as it can directly get to the culprit.

Could you please share your thoughts for these 2 options?
Thanks :-)


The argument is about reporting of genuine fire incidents. How much information about a particular fire is reported is not relevant. The correct option should highlight an advantage of the phones over the alarm boxes in reducing the number of anonymous prank calls, not in any other aspect (such as more information). Hence option A is better than option C.
Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false   [#permalink] 25 May 2017, 10:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: guhabhishek 0 21 Jan 2017, 21:52
Springfield Fire Commissioner: withme 0 21 Dec 2015, 01:59
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic In recent decades, the vast majority of construction soaringAlone 14 20 May 2015, 05:19
14 Springfi eld Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false ankitranjan 9 05 Dec 2015, 11:20
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false hemanthp 9 21 Apr 2014, 04:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.