Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Feb 2017, 15:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 141
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 37

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2014, 05:50
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:15) correct 44% (01:28) wrong based on 2388 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

gmatbull wrote:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms
are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street
these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we
propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the
proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from.

B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately
five million dollars annually.

C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information
about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.

D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s
capacity for responding to fires.

E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones
in Springfield are out of service.

got it wrong though , now i understand OA is A

"A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from."

Because conclusion was that they can now receive calls from private phones.. and option A suggest that they are able to receive and process each and every private call.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Posts: 109
Concentration: Marketing
GMAT 1: Q48 V25
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 49 [1] , given: 66

Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2014, 15:42
1
KUDOS
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?
The stimulus is a strengthen question. We need to find out what supports the conclusion of the fire commissioner.

His conclusion: Removing the call boxes will reduce the number of prank phone calls without interfering with fire reports.
His premise: Majority of false fire alarms are pranks from anonymous people. Everyone has a private telephone.

So to support the stimulus we need to find an answer choice that will demonstrate why removing the boxes will reduce prank phone calls.

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from. If the anonymity of the call boxes is what promotes people to make prank phone calls then this is an ideal answer choice. If you remove the anonymity then there will be less prank calls.

B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately five million dollars annually.
The costs is irrelevant to the prank phone calls made from call boxes.

C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.
The ability to report more info about a fire is also irrelevant to reducing prank phone calls through the call boxes.

D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
This answer choice involves how to deal with false alarms but it does not discuss how to deal with reducing them.

E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.
Still irrelevant to reducing prank phone calls.
Intern
Status: One more shot
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 34
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 132

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2015, 20:06
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Springfield Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire
alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes
have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the
announced effect?

(A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they
came from.
(B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately $5 million annually. (C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box. (D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires. (E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service. _________________ Believe you can and you are halfway there-Theodore Roosevelt Math Forum Moderator Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator Joined: 11 Jun 2011 Posts: 2422 Location: India GPA: 3.5 WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking) Followers: 96 Kudos [?]: 696 [0], given: 323 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink] ### Show Tags 12 Dec 2015, 03:41 guhabhishek wrote: Springfield Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect? Powerscore CR Bible states for Strengthens Questions suing the following steps - 1. Identify the conclusion - Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. 2. Personalize the argument - Removing the alarm boxes will reduce prank calls , however the fire incidents are reported by private telephones. 3. Look for weakness in the argument - Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls but it will hamper people’s ability to report a fire. Now check the options - 4. Argument of analogy/surveys - strengthen the analogy 5. Correct argument will strengthen the argument just a Little / Lot Quote: (A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from (B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately$5 million annually.
(C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
(D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
(E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.

The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and( false alarm calls can be reduced) records where they came from ( Functions as an alarm Box)

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 19
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 18

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2015, 08:29
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Conclusion : To remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Analysis
(A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they
came from. - Correct Since easily track location of the fire and caller. So prank calls will be reduced.
(B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately $5 million annually. - Out of scopre :Argument does not talk about operating cost (C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box. - A telephone call can not be considered as fire alarm call (D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires. - Weakens the conclusion (E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.- Irrelevant Hence A is the best choice ! Current Student Joined: 22 Dec 2015 Posts: 99 Concentration: General Management GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47 GPA: 3.89 WE: Accounting (Energy and Utilities) Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 40 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink] ### Show Tags 30 Dec 2015, 08:54 Drat. Deciding between A and D and picked the wrong one. I want to make sure I'm rationalizing why correctly-is D out of scope? Ie., we're talking about reporting fires, not responding to them? GMAT Club Legend Joined: 01 Oct 2013 Posts: 10622 Followers: 941 Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink] ### Show Tags 08 Jan 2016, 19:00 Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. Manager Joined: 20 Apr 2014 Posts: 127 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 23 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink] ### Show Tags 23 Jan 2016, 11:48 i think here, A validates a necessary assumption to make the conclusion true. this is one way to strengthen the conclusion. i am trying to categorize the solution approach. Manager Joined: 29 Oct 2016 Posts: 189 Concentration: Finance, Economics GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24 GRE 1: 314 Q167 V147 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 669 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink] ### Show Tags 17 Jan 2017, 23:42 Hi expert, The conclusion is the proposal to removal fire alarm boxes.Removing such boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people's ability to report a fire. I could hardly eliminate option C.In my 2 cents,option C ensures that removing such boxes won't cause any difficulties to report a fire;hence it is a good contender.Option A is also another good contender;it states that fire department can trace the call;hence,the department can somehow limit the false alarm,if any, from telephone as it can directly get to the culprit. Could you please share your thoughts for these 2 options? Thanks Intern Joined: 03 Nov 2016 Posts: 23 Location: India Schools: IIMA PGPX"18 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 59 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Jan 2017, 00:39 Answer is A As fire department can trace calls, prank calls will either reduce or lead to catching the pranksters. Kudos please, if it helped Manager Joined: 04 Sep 2015 Posts: 146 Location: India WE: Information Technology (Computer Software) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 12 Re: Springfield Fire Commissioner: [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Jan 2017, 16:53 (A) The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from. Correct answer (B) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately$5 million annually.
out of scope since there is no mention of the financial aspect of the plan
(C) A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire
than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
out of scope since calls can still be made with many phones available
(D) Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
does effect the plan and the reasoning but the plan does not solely depend on the point and this does not directly support the argument.
(E) On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.
out of scope
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2712
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 392

Kudos [?]: 1752 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2017, 20:52
sleepynut wrote:
Hi expert,
The conclusion is the proposal to removal fire alarm boxes.Removing such boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people's ability to report a fire.

I could hardly eliminate option C.In my 2 cents,option C ensures that removing such boxes won't cause any difficulties to report a fire;hence it is a good contender.Option A is also another good contender;it states that fire department can trace the call;hence,the department can somehow limit the false alarm,if any, from telephone as it can directly get to the culprit.

Thanks

The argument is about reporting of genuine fire incidents. How much information about a particular fire is reported is not relevant. The correct option should highlight an advantage of the phones over the alarm boxes in reducing the number of anonymous prank calls, not in any other aspect (such as more information). Hence option A is better than option C.
Springfield Fire Commissioner:   [#permalink] 21 Jan 2017, 20:52
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
14 Springfi eld Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false 9 09 Oct 2010, 02:12
Q22. Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of 2 19 Jun 2008, 14:50
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false 3 27 Apr 2008, 10:57
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false 9 22 Sep 2010, 19:14
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false 0 25 Jun 2011, 22:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by