Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 20:07 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 20:07

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 156 [14]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V34
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 120 [6]
Given Kudos: 64
Location: United States
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Status:Profile 1
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [1]
Given Kudos: 41
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2018
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [3]
Given Kudos: 72
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1. Based on the information presented by the author, it can be inferred that if Higgs bosons did not exist

A) the current theory of how particles gain mass would have to be adapted
B) subatomic particles would not be able to gain mass
C) the Standard Model would be proved erroneous
D) scientists would be forced to look for another, lighter particle
E) more experiments using highly energetic particle collisions would have to be conducted


If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate. On the other hand, if results demonstrate that the Higgs boson does not exist, then scientists will need to consider alternative versions of the theory.

the passage clearly mentions that if Higss does not exist then scientist will need to consider alternate versions of the theory. it is nowhere mentioned that that theory will be the current theory.

IMO the answer should be C
passage says :- If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate- by which we can infer that if not , then the theory is erroneous ( inaccurate)

Pls explain this
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 139 [2]
Given Kudos: 71
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Quote:
1. Based on the information presented by the author, it can be inferred that if Higgs bosons did not exist

A) the current theory of how particles gain mass would have to be adapted
B) subatomic particles would not be able to gain mass
C) the Standard Model would be proved erroneous
D) scientists would be forced to look for another, lighter particle
E) more experiments using highly energetic particle collisions would have to be conducted


If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate. On the other hand, if results demonstrate that the Higgs boson does not exist, then scientists will need to consider alternative versions of the theory.

the passage clearly mentions that if Higss does not exist then scientist will need to consider alternate versions of the theory. it is nowhere mentioned that that theory will be the current theory.

IMO the answer should be C
passage says :- If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate- by which we can infer that if not , then the theory is erroneous ( inaccurate)

Pls explain this


Personal explanation:
On the other hand, if results demonstrate that the Higgs boson does not exist, then scientists will need to consider alternative versions of the theory.
Alternate version of the theory ie. theory other than The Standard Model (the current theory of how particles gain mass)

Answer C is incorrect (the Standard Model would be proved erroneous)
"If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate." that means it only satisfy part of the Model NOT THE FULL MODEL because the answer states the whole model will be wrong therefore incorrect
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 120 [1]
Given Kudos: 64
Location: United States
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
jokschmer: I am not sure if my analysis is 100% correct. even i selected choice D. But Here is my analysis.

Let's look at the question:
4. According to the passage, if Higgs bosons exist, then they possess all of the following properties EXCEPT

A) a fast decay rate
B) the ability to work in conjunction with the Higgs field
C) a difficulty to be detected if they were created
D) be created by massive particle detectors
E) relatively little mass
-------------
My interpretation of the question:
We are asked to determine, if Higgs bosons exist, What are all the properties/characterists possed by Higgs bosons? We are NOT asked to determine how Higgs bosons are created?
-------------
D - very tempting choice, i understand that they want to trick us by presenting D as an option. we clearly see Higgs bosons are created by particle accelerators and not by particle detectors. But is that what question is asking for? Not really.
-------------
Now for Option E: relatively little mass

The 2nd para shows : If it were similar to lighter, more commonly found bosons, such as photons, it would be easily identifiable.

The 3rd para shows: Recent findings have nevertheless been promising........While the data is not yet conclusive, if the particle can indeed be shown to be a Higgs boson, then scientists will be able to take the next step of considering whether its characteristics match those predicted by the Standard Model.

My analysis:
It can be interpreted from para 2 and para 3 that, the study is not conclusive, it's just promising. Further, there's no confirmation that Higgs boson are similar to that of photons. The 3rd para says that scientist will evaluate whether its characteristics match those predicted by the Standard Model.
"mass" is one of the properties of the particles. hence the para does not say or confirm that Higgs bosons have relatively little mass. Scientist still need to evaluate that. hence choice E is the right answer.

i hope this is clear.

---------
Give kudos even if you disagree.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
Hi u1983

Can u please help with Q3.
I marked D.
D) the particle discovered at the European Center for Nuclear Research has some properties that are not consistent with those predicted for the Higgs boson
If some properties are not consistent with those predicted for Higgs boson. As properties are different from what we need and if we use them in Standard model then the accuracy of Standard Model will be at risk. Hence its weakening the statement
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [4]
Given Kudos: 658
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Passage summary:
1) Introduces an issue, i.e. SM does not agree that subatomic particles can gain mass, and a possible solution to it - Higgs field and boson;
2) Describes the implications that could occur if the theory were proved to be correct or incorrect, and accounts for several challenges that surround the finding of the boson;
3) EONR has manage to detect evidence that the boson may exist, but more research is needed to confirm the finding in order to further explain MS


1. Based on the information presented by the author, it can be inferred that if Higgs bosons did not exist Relevant text: <...> but the mathematics behind the model seemed to prohibit subatomic particles from having any mass at all <...> If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate. On the other hand, if results demonstrate that the Higgs boson does not exist, then scientists will need to consider alternative versions of the theory.
A) the current theory of how particles gain mass would have to be adapted on the one hand, the "current" theory doesn't allow subatomic particles to gain mass. So the wording is kind of imprecise. On the other hand, if not the boson, then alternatives will be build around MS. In that case, this seems to be the correct answer
B) subatomic particles would not be able to gain mass too generic, because there may be alternatives to allow subatomic particles to gain mass
C) the Standard Model would be proved erroneous incomplete does not translate into flawed. Moreover, it's said that scientists will need to rely on alternative methods instead, if the boson is found non-existent
D) scientists would be forced to look for another, lighter particle not given: we don't know whether this would an alternative
E) more experiments using highly energetic particle collisions would have to be conducted again, the same as in D

2) The primary purpose of the passage is to
A) present a disputed theory and defend its accuracy
B) criticize a conventional model and argue for an alternative theory
C) outline an issue and demonstrate the unlikelihood of resolving it
D) describe a problem and examine its possible solutions correct
E) contrast two different models and show that one is more accurate

3) The author’s claim that “if experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate” would be most undermined by the discovery that Relevant text: The Standard Model gave satisfactory results in other areas in which it had been tested, but the mathematics behind the model seemed to prohibit subatomic particles from having any mass at all, which meant that the model was incomplete. Scientists speculated that a mechanism must exist that causes such particles to gain mass, but does not violate the principles of the Standard Model. They theorized that a field known as the Higgs field would allow such a mechanism to function, and that the Higgs field would have an accompanying Higgs boson particle. - to put it shortly, the boson would account for the mass. So in order to weaken the confidence that the scientist expect from the finding, we need to assume that we would find the boson that it would not account for the mass, undermining the hypothesis
A) many subatomic particles produce decay signatures that are similar to those predicted for the Higgs boson doesn't even address the boson
B) in order to create mass, the Higgs field must work with another unidentified mechanism that requires its own accompanying particle fits the bill, because it seems that there's something more than just the boson that is required to allow subatomic particles to collect mass
C) Higgs bosons and photons are both highly energetic and can decay very rapidly when created by particle accelerators this has already been given
D) the particle discovered at the European Center for Nuclear Research has some properties that are not consistent with those predicted for the Higgs boson the question stem already tells us to assume that the boson has been proved to exist
E) most collisions created by particle accelerators produce particles other than Higgs bosons, so the probability of discovering the Higgs boson is very low the same as in D

4. According to the passage, if Higgs bosons exist, then they possess all of the following properties EXCEPT
A) a fast decay rate Further complicating matters, any Higgs bosons that are created will only exist for mere fractions of a second before quickly decaying <...>
B) the ability to work in conjunction with the Higgs field They theorized that a field known as the Higgs field would allow such a mechanism to function, and that the Higgs field would have an accompanying Higgs boson particle.
C) a difficulty to be detected if they were created However, this particle can only be created through highly energetic particle collisions achieved by massive particle accelerators, and even then, such particle collisions are just as likely to produce particles other than the Higgs boson.
D) be created by massive particle detectors this one seems really disputable. However, "Further complicating matters, any Higgs bosons that are created will only exist for mere fractions of a second before quickly decaying, which means that rather than studying the particles directly, scientists must analyze the patterns of the decay in order to determine whether the particle was in fact a Higgs boson." - implies that a detector will have to "create" the boson from scratch, relying on the patterns of its decay. Other ideas?
E) relatively little mass correct: If it were similar to lighter, more commonly found bosons, such as photons, it would be easily identifiable.

Quote:
guptakashish02
,
Please refer to my explanation
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
Valhalla wrote:
Quote:
1. Based on the information presented by the author, it can be inferred that if Higgs bosons did not exist

A) the current theory of how particles gain mass would have to be adapted
B) subatomic particles would not be able to gain mass
C) the Standard Model would be proved erroneous
D) scientists would be forced to look for another, lighter particle
E) more experiments using highly energetic particle collisions would have to be conducted


If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate. On the other hand, if results demonstrate that the Higgs boson does not exist, then scientists will need to consider alternative versions of the theory.

the passage clearly mentions that if Higss does not exist then scientist will need to consider alternate versions of the theory. it is nowhere mentioned that that theory will be the current theory.

IMO the answer should be C
passage says :- If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate- by which we can infer that if not , then the theory is erroneous ( inaccurate)

Pls explain this


Personal explanation:
On the other hand, if results demonstrate that the Higgs boson does not exist, then scientists will need to consider alternative versions of the theory.
Alternate version of the theory ie. theory other than The Standard Model (the current theory of how particles gain mass)

Answer C is incorrect (the Standard Model would be proved erroneous)
"If experiments prove that the Higgs boson exists, then scientists can be satisfied that this part of the Standard Model is accurate." that means it only satisfy part of the Model NOT THE FULL MODEL because the answer states the whole model will be wrong therefore incorrect


if the experiment failed, then part of the model would be considered as inaccurate, which means erroneous, just as C.
why A is better than C?
if the scientists are going to find an alternative, then they needn't adapt the old one at all.
please explain, I'm frustrated
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 823 [0]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
Only Q4 is non-debatable, whereas something or the other in other OAs is inconsistent with the passage. Q4 OA has the issue of 'detectors' vs 'accelerators'.
Q2 has OA that indicates possible solution(s) as opposed to one solution that is discussed in the passage. Q1 OA clearly is incorrect and should be C per the passage.

Based on my practice sessions from various sources, I would recommend to not pay attention to this RC.
This, however, is again my personal recommendation.

Thanks!
Director
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 583
Own Kudos [?]: 1321 [0]
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
Got 4/4 correct in 7:54 min including 2:45 min to read the passage!

Passage Map:


1) How particles acquire mass? HF
2) HB, Implication of finding HB, Challenges in finding HB
3) Recent Findings
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17205
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: As scientists developed the Standard Model of physics (the generally a [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne