It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 06:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1870

Kudos [?]: 607 [0], given: 32

Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2010, 16:45
Know where I can find an article that discusses stanford business school rejecting all the 800 GMAT applicants? I remember this being discussed here, but I could not come up with it when I did a search. Thanks.
_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a\$\$.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 607 [0], given: 32

Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 94 [3], given: 21

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 14:53
3
KUDOS
hmm... rejecting a 800 scorer would make us try to score "less" than 800... not a frightening and irrealistic perspective to me :p
_________________

If you find the post useful, don't be shy and Kudo me

Kudos [?]: 94 [3], given: 21

Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 94 [2], given: 21

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2010, 05:24
2
KUDOS
Leadership is definitely a "key" component of the application requirement... Not sure if everyone can be one though... and itis sometimes difficult to "prove it" don't you think? (even if it happens that people invent some stories... but I have been told that admission staff is used to that, and tend to be severe if they notice it)
_________________

If you find the post useful, don't be shy and Kudo me

Kudos [?]: 94 [2], given: 21

Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 138

Kudos [?]: 30 [1], given: 4

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2010, 16:20
1
KUDOS
I wonder if it matters to the adcoms whether an applicant has an 800 GMAT or "just" say 780. After some score level, there's probably not much difference in perception. And having an 800 GMAT and being rejected should not be unusual. Even if say all 4-5 applicants with 800s in an application season are rejected it shouldn't be surprising given a 90%+ rejection rate. Fit always plays a bigger factor.
_________________

MBAvolunteers - Application feedback & interview preps in exchange for a donation to a non-profit

Kudos [?]: 30 [1], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 94 [1], given: 21

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2010, 14:57
1
KUDOS
and btw, I totally agree with the fact that, as they take other things into considerations, it would be difficult to infer from this small (and unrepresentative) sample a rule such as "admission staff reject 800 GMAT scorers".
So please just go ahead and do not be afraid of scoring 800
_________________

If you find the post useful, don't be shy and Kudo me

Kudos [?]: 94 [1], given: 21

Current Student
Status: Matriculating to Ross!
Joined: 05 Dec 2010
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 32 [1], given: 15

Schools: Harvard, Ross, McCombs, Mendoza
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2010, 23:17
1
KUDOS
You can be insanely smart and not be able to lead. The MBA is supposed to be a leadership degree at its core. I had an MIT grad in my Officer Candidate School class who graduated with something like a 3.9 in mechanical engineering, but he was so socially inept that he came across as stupid. He ended up attriting because no one would follow him.

That said, there's no way an 800 hurts anyone on its merit alone.

Kudos [?]: 32 [1], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 94 [1], given: 21

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2010, 06:10
1
KUDOS
btw: there are also 650 Gmat scores who manage to go to Wharton... another evidence that GMAT is JUST one of the stuff to take into account
_________________

If you find the post useful, don't be shy and Kudo me

Kudos [?]: 94 [1], given: 21

Joined: 30 Nov 2009
Posts: 5596

Kudos [?]: 955 [1], given: 48

Location: Chicago, IL
Schools: Brown University, Harvard Business School
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2013, 04:59
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Yeah, but once you pass the 700 mark, you know the 750 won't matter all that much (not in comparison to your career history, your academic history, who you are and where you come from). There is a tendency of candidates (especially amongst Asian applicants) to think that a super high GMAT will cover any problem and magically get you in anywhere.

But there is no substitute for a continued proof of excellence, and frankly, just writing beautiful heartfelt challenging interesting essays.. you know, being a person!
_________________

Jon Frank

If you like the post, give it a KUDOS!

Kudos [?]: 955 [1], given: 48

SVP
Status: Burning mid-night oil....daily
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 2400

Kudos [?]: 745 [0], given: 548

Schools: Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2010, 19:26

Kudos [?]: 745 [0], given: 548

Current Student
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 3439

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2010, 06:19
I've never found anything actually besides random message board posts about those rejected students.

Although, Stanford quotes their entire GMAT range on their incoming class profiles and they go back several years. In two of the past four classes, the range only goes up to 790. With 5000-7500 applicants a cycle, it seems very likely that Stanford rejected at least one 800 score in at least those two years where the range stops at 790.

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 3439

VP
Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 1199

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 19

Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2012
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2010, 07:57
There's an applicant this year to Wharton who got rejected w/o interview, with plenty of work experience and 800.

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 19

Intern
Joined: 30 Apr 2010
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2010, 19:41
The people who are spreading the myth that Stanford rejects applicants with perfect 800 GMAT scores are exactly those with problems with Critical Reasoning skills.

Stanford happens to have rejected many candidates with an 800, but that's just statistics combined with their policy of not making the GMAT an overriding factor in acceptance. It doesn't mean that they don't like candidates with an 800. Even my brother who's at Stanford right now made that same logical mistake (but that's why he got a 750 and I got a 780 ).

Here's the quote from a speech welcoming the MBA class of 2005:
Quote:
"With 14 applicants for every space in the class, we had to make some difficult decisions," said Bolton. He continued, "we turned down every applicant with an 800 GMAT score this year. We also turned down Olympic medalists, entrepreneurs, managers of thriving businesses, Rhodes Scholars — incredible people who, like you, have achieved amazing success in life and who have compelling prospects for the future.

Surely, you don't think Stanford rejects entrepreneurs because they are entrepreneurs.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Current Student
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

Schools: Tuck Class of 2013
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2010, 05:37
asimov wrote:
There's an applicant this year to Wharton who got rejected w/o interview, with plenty of work experience and 800.

This guy is 37.

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 4

WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 02:50
MBAUncle wrote:
asimov wrote:
There's an applicant this year to Wharton who got rejected w/o interview, with plenty of work experience and 800.

This guy is 37.

Yeah, I posted a reference to that in another thread.

37, and already in a position where he'd likely be able to pick and choose MBAs to hire for his desk. His next stop in business life is to manage throngs of MBAs, not turn into one himself. That's what comes to mind for me.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 30 Apr 2010
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 02:55
osbornecox wrote:
MBAUncle wrote:
asimov wrote:
There's an applicant this year to Wharton who got rejected w/o interview, with plenty of work experience and 800.

This guy is 37.

Yeah, I posted a reference to that in another thread.

37, and already in a position where he'd likely be able to pick and choose MBAs to hire for his desk. His next stop in business life is to manage throngs of MBAs, not turn into one himself. That's what comes to mind for me.

Where does it say that he got dinged w/o interview?
Right now, it just says "School: Wharton - Submitted @ R2 deadline (Best of the best)"

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 13

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 03:14
AloneAndInsufficient wrote:

Where does it say that he got dinged w/o interview?
Right now, it just says "School: Wharton - Submitted @ R2 deadline (Best of the best)"

If you go to the Wharton admits list, then you can find Lugo there in ding without interview list. That's probably a disadvantage of a too successful career

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 4

WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 04:12
Cielo wrote:
AloneAndInsufficient wrote:

Where does it say that he got dinged w/o interview?
Right now, it just says "School: Wharton - Submitted @ R2 deadline (Best of the best)"

If you go to the Wharton admits list, then you can find Lugo there in ding without interview list. That's probably a disadvantage of a too successful career

There's honestly not much an MBA could've offered him at that point. You also have to wonderr what the tone of his essays was - hopefully he didn't exude that same "best of the best" one-app mentality from his essays.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2010, 10:06
Super awesome. Thanks for the inspiration.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 13 Feb 2009
Posts: 262

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 45

Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
WE: Other (Insurance)
Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2010, 12:52
osbornecox wrote:
Cielo wrote:
AloneAndInsufficient wrote:

Where does it say that he got dinged w/o interview?
Right now, it just says "School: Wharton - Submitted @ R2 deadline (Best of the best)"

If you go to the Wharton admits list, then you can find Lugo there in ding without interview list. That's probably a disadvantage of a too successful career

There's honestly not much an MBA could've offered him at that point. You also have to wonderr what the tone of his essays was - hopefully he didn't exude that same "best of the best" one-app mentality from his essays.

Agree...but as head of a quant group at an investment bank he might be a good candidate for an Executive MBA at Wharton. Perhaps trying to move into senior corporate leadership (CEO, COO, etc).

There's so much more than work experience and scores that go into an application. Some people feel entitled to got to Wharton or Harvard with a 780 or 800 core. I think this can get them dinged pretty fast.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 45

Intern
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2012, 08:29
this is a great post thanks

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants   [#permalink] 11 Jun 2012, 08:29

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Stanford Reliance Fellowship Applicants 0 15 Jun 2016, 03:18
6 Applications, Love, Columbia, Stanford... 8 13 Nov 2012, 06:29
a few questions on stanford's application... 1 08 Oct 2011, 20:56
1 Perfecting The B-School Application 5 06 Oct 2010, 18:49
Application rejected - requesting for reasons for rejection 11 27 May 2015, 22:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Stanford Rejects Perfect Scores of Applicants

Moderators: aeropower, OasisGC, bb10

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.