GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 07 Aug 2020, 11:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Status: Future Ninja
Joined: 11 Jan 2020
Posts: 33
Re: Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jun 2020, 02:45
Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

I don't understand why is it okay to have 'overcompensating' and 'growing an extra one or two' in parallel. In fact, people here seem to suggest that it would other wise be incorrect if these two elements were not written in parallel, as it is written in E.

I thought 'growing an extra one or two' is HOW starfish 'overcompensate', hence this sentence might be even better:

Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating, growing an extra one or two.


On another note, does not a comma-with behave similar to comma-ing, hence 'with the animal sometimes overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.' modifies 'it is quickly replaced' in the correct option?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 330
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Re: Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2020, 18:14
bitorbyte wrote:
Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.

I don't understand why is it okay to have 'overcompensating' and 'growing an extra one or two' in parallel. In fact, people here seem to suggest that it would other wise be incorrect if these two elements were not written in parallel, as it is written in E.

I thought 'growing an extra one or two' is HOW starfish 'overcompensate', hence this sentence might be even better:

Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating, growing an extra one or two.


On another note, does not a comma-with behave similar to comma-ing, hence 'with the animal sometimes overcompensating and growing an extra one or two.' modifies 'it is quickly replaced' in the correct option?


There are other problems with E so we are left with choice B which is not ideal but we have no other better option
1. they lose one arm ? - how can multiple starfish have one arm? it would have been better, if they had mentioned any arm.
2. sometimes with animal overcompensating and sometimes with something else? All the action is done by animals. so better version is with the animal sometimes overcompensating,
3. It is not ideal to say Xing and Ying when Y is result of X action, but it is not wrong still. e.g. Company was releasing offers and letting customer choose the best of it. is not wrong
4. Clause, with xx. Prepositional phrase after comma is modifying preceding clause. <it is quickly replaced > how ? it is quickly replaced ,with xyz. If no comma then it would modify action ( replaced). E.g. : replaced with prosthetic arm.

i hope it helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Location: India
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2020, 09:24
Hello Experts! I am glad I got this question right but I find my reasoning for the eliminations of answer C,D and E quite vague and not concrete, I would love some feedback on it.

I eliminated options C,D,E for the usage of "they lose"--> Plural, followed by "the animal" --> singular.

Let me know your thoughts,
Thanks,
Varun Madan
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
V
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3646
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2020, 21:08
1
vmadan10 wrote:
Hello Experts! I am glad I got this question right but I find my reasoning for the eliminations of answer C,D and E quite vague and not concrete, I would love some feedback on it.

I eliminated options C,D,E for the usage of "they lose"--> Plural, followed by "the animal" --> singular.

Let me know your thoughts,
Thanks,
Varun Madan

Have you tried reviewing this post?
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutors @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | YouTube | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener   [#permalink] 24 Jul 2020, 21:08

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   [ 64 posts ] 

Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regener

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne