It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 03:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

State tax officials, having had considerable success in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2005, 13:10
The conlcusion is that state officials plan to use reduction in penalties as a way to collect past due taxes. No where in the whole passage states that this must be the only way to collect taxes (which is what D is saying). Also, the reduction of penalties "had considerable success" but not absolute 100% guaranteed success rate. In fact you can have stiff fines and reduce penalties concurrently and the argument still holds. D is too absolute to be the answer.

B must be a premise/assumption b/c if negated then it would say: stiff fines are the only way to collect past taxes. The argument cannot be true if this were the case.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 14 May 2012
Posts: 75

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 15

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.8
WE: Corporate Finance (Venture Capital)
GMAT ToolKit User
state tax plan - kaplan Diagnostic [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2012, 03:11
State tax officials, having had considerable success in persuading delinquent individuals to pay their back taxes through the incentive of reduced penalties, plan to adopt a similar approach in order to collect past due taxes from corporations.

The state tax plan outlined above assumes that

a. federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner
b. stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes
c. corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for the same length of time that individual taxpayers are
d. past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties
e. penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 15

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 536

Kudos [?]: 353 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: state tax plan - kaplan Diagnostic [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2012, 03:39
Good Causal question.

Concession in fines ---->successful payback from defaulters

Though (D) is tempting, but (B) is correct since, A to B doesn't mean B to A too.

There could be other ways (legislative,punitive etc..) to make the defaulters payback the money.
But it would not be sufficient to say that the taxes CAN NOT be collected without the concession.

IMO-(B)
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Kudos [?]: 353 [0], given: 75

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 14 May 2012
Posts: 75

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 15

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.8
WE: Corporate Finance (Venture Capital)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: State tax officials, having had considerable success in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2012, 03:37
Can some expert Pl ans this Q in detail ??

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 15

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10117

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: State tax officials, having had considerable success in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2015, 16:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Mar 2017
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 5

Re: State tax officials, having had considerable success in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2017, 16:37
Correct answer is B.

With answer choice D, the argument doesn't assume that this is the only way to collect back taxes, it just this method worked with individuals.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 194

Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: State tax officials, having had considerable success in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 04:42
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
gmataquaguy wrote:
State tax officials, having had considerable success in persuading delinquent individuals to pay their back taxes through the incentive of reduced penalties, plan to adopt a similiar approach in order to collect past due taxes from corporations.

The state tax plan outlined above assumes that

A) federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner
B) stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes
C) corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for teh same length of time that individual taxpayers are
D) past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties
E) penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals.


Responding to a pm:

Plan:
State has had considerable success in collecting individuals' back taxes through reduced penalties incentive.
It intends to do the same with corporations.

We need to find an assumption - something that is required to make this plan work.

A) federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner
We don't need to worry about what federal tax officials may do. It is irrelevant to our argument.

B) stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes
This NEEDS to be correct for our plan to work. We plan to give reduced penalties incentive i.e. we plan to reduce stiff fines. If stiff fines were the only way to collect past due corporate taxes, then our plan will fail. We have to assume that past due taxes can be collected without stiff fines too. And hence this is the answer.

C) corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for teh same length of time that individual taxpayers are
The length of time for which the back taxes are due has not been discussed anywhere and has no relevance to our argument. We are concerned about reducing penalties.

D) past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties
We do not NEED this for our plan to be successful. It is not a necessary condition. Think of it this way. I have a problem A - (back taxes). I decide to solve it by using solution B (reduce stiff penalties). For my plan to succeed, is it necessary that B is the ONLY solution to A? No. There could be ten other solutions - C, D etc. I chose to use B as a solution but it needn't be the only solution for B to be successful. Hope you see why (D) is not correct.

E) penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals.
We don't need to assume this. We might be able to make the plan work with a smaller cut in the fines or might need to bigger cut for the corporations.

Answer (B)


Thanks Karishma, I have a small query though. Doesn't assumption have to bring in new information?
+1 Kudos for your explanation for incorrect option D. Cheers. 8-)
_________________

Press kudos if you liked this post

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 194

Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7674

Kudos [?]: 17345 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: State tax officials, having had considerable success in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 10:26
adkikani wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
gmataquaguy wrote:
State tax officials, having had considerable success in persuading delinquent individuals to pay their back taxes through the incentive of reduced penalties, plan to adopt a similiar approach in order to collect past due taxes from corporations.

The state tax plan outlined above assumes that

A) federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner
B) stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes
C) corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for teh same length of time that individual taxpayers are
D) past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties
E) penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals.


Responding to a pm:

Plan:
State has had considerable success in collecting individuals' back taxes through reduced penalties incentive.
It intends to do the same with corporations.

We need to find an assumption - something that is required to make this plan work.

A) federal tax officials will not attempt to collect back taxes in the same manner
We don't need to worry about what federal tax officials may do. It is irrelevant to our argument.

B) stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due corporate taxes
This NEEDS to be correct for our plan to work. We plan to give reduced penalties incentive i.e. we plan to reduce stiff fines. If stiff fines were the only way to collect past due corporate taxes, then our plan will fail. We have to assume that past due taxes can be collected without stiff fines too. And hence this is the answer.

C) corporations tend to be delinquent in their taxes for teh same length of time that individual taxpayers are
The length of time for which the back taxes are due has not been discussed anywhere and has no relevance to our argument. We are concerned about reducing penalties.

D) past due taxes cannot be collected without a reduction in penalties
We do not NEED this for our plan to be successful. It is not a necessary condition. Think of it this way. I have a problem A - (back taxes). I decide to solve it by using solution B (reduce stiff penalties). For my plan to succeed, is it necessary that B is the ONLY solution to A? No. There could be ten other solutions - C, D etc. I chose to use B as a solution but it needn't be the only solution for B to be successful. Hope you see why (D) is not correct.

E) penalties for delinquent corporations will have to be reduced by the same percentage as were penalties for delinquent individuals.
We don't need to assume this. We might be able to make the plan work with a smaller cut in the fines or might need to bigger cut for the corporations.

Answer (B)


Thanks Karishma, I have a small query though. Doesn't assumption have to bring in new information?
+1 Kudos for your explanation for incorrect option D. Cheers. 8-)


Yes, an assumption has to bring in new information. The argument does not give you "stiff fines are not the only way to collect past due CORPORATE taxes". It is new information. We assume this, plan accordingly and hope that our plan works.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17345 [0], given: 232

Re: State tax officials, having had considerable success in   [#permalink] 30 May 2017, 10:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

State tax officials, having had considerable success in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.