GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 18 Jan 2020, 02:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60461
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 22:58
2
28
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (02:23) correct 29% (02:42) wrong based on 856 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Project CR Butler:Day 9:Critical Reasoning (CR2)

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.

Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.

If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturer’s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 360
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.76
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2018, 00:17
6
Must Be C
As per Mining company, import quotas on less expensive copper mined outside will increase market price of copper within US but what if maximum of copper is purchased within US. The price will go up and finished good made from copper will be expensive. so in the end, companies might start buying copper at international level. So the proposal of copper mining will give negative impact.
_________________
Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S
##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2017
Posts: 14
Location: India
WE: Asset Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2018, 10:16
5
(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company: WRONG
REASONING: the response of copper wire manufacturers is self-serving but not 'irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company'.
His statement asks Mining companies to look at the other aspect which they have missed for their own survival.

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company:WRONG
REASONING: the response of copper wire manufacturers is NOT circular.
His statement asks Mining companies to look at the other aspect.

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business: CORRECT
REASONING: The wire manufacturers elaborates that if prices of copper are maintained at current levels, the production cost will be more leading to low sales and subsequently low demand for copper. This low demand would impact Mining companies adversely.

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business. WRONG
REASONING: Wire manufacturers has NOT failed to give proper reasoning.They have very well explained why the proposal of the mining company may not be beneficial for their own good.

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected: WRONG.
REASONING: Wire manufacturers never mentions that business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected.
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 484
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2018, 01:16
2
Bunuel wrote:
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.

Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.

If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturer’s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected

Breaking the premise down :

P1 states that import quotas should be put on less expensive copper(mined outside the country) while the company should not have any restriction on the expensive copper (mined inside the country). Copper Mfg won't be able to stay in business if there are restrictions imposed on expensive copper.

P2 responds that Wire Mfg company buys a good chunk of Expensive copper(mined inside the country). So, if there are no quotas on on expensive copper than sales of wire will decrease and hence, the demand of copper, hurting the business of Copper Mfg.

C --> shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business

PS: Although the logic is legitimate, I am not sure about the correctness of imposing Import Quotas on something mined inside the country.
Of course, there is no explicit mention of imposing those on copper mined inside the country but, since the Wire Mfg. talks only about the copper mined inside the United States, the imposition of Import Quotas on that seems to be flawed in its very meaning.
GMATNinja , Request your insights if I am missing something. Thank you.
_________________
------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 37
Location: India
Schools: HBS '22, HEC '22
GMAT 1: 570 Q39 V28
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V26
GPA: 4
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2018, 02:03
1
Mining company is favoring import quota for cheap imports
and Wire manufacturer is going for cheap prices of copper they get from international market...

as wire manufacturer says that they consume 70% of copper from US origin..
they use 30% from outside and if prices of 30% of copper will increase , the demand for
70% copper will also decrease ...due to lack of overall demand

SO proposal of Mining company will have negative impact on itself...

SO C is the ans
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9983
Location: Pune, India
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas shou  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2018, 01:10
1
1
1
Bunuel wrote:

Project CR Butler:Day 9:Critical Reasoning (CR2)

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.

Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.

If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturer’s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected

Copper mining company: Copper mined outside US is cheaper. Have an import quota on it (e.g. only 100k tonnes can be imported every year etc). Else, we will need to reduce our prices (else copper users will buy from outside US for all their needs). We need to maintain our higher prices to stay in business.

Copper using company: We buy 70% of our copper from US. If we don't pay cheaper prices, we will not be competitive and our sales will go down. So demand for US copper will go down. (In effect saying that then we will not be able to buy much from you anyway since our demand would be low)

The Copper using company's argument is...

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company
It is not irrelevant to the mining company's proposal. It makes a point why mining company's proposal will hurt the mining company itself.

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company
It is not circular. It does not presuppose what it sets out to prove. It tells why lower prices of copper are needed for both - mining companies and wire manufacturers

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business
True. It shows how lower prices would reduce the demand for US copper and hence hurt the mining companies themselves. This is the answer

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business
It does not fail to give a reason why mining company's proposal should not be put in effect. It gives a reason why it should not be put in effect.

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected
It talks about how mining company's business will be harmed if the proposal is accepted. It does not say that their business will prosper if the proposal is rejected. The business may still not "prosper" if the proposal is rejected.

_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7785
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2020, 04:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import   [#permalink] 09 Jan 2020, 04:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by