Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 25 Mar 2017, 04:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 86
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 11:27
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level that constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that witholds highway funds from those states that don't enforce the applicable standard.

b) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withholds
c) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withheld
d) which constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that withholds
e) which constitutes drunk driving because a federal law witholds

It is obvious that you have to make a choice between 'which' and 'that'. Please help me with the reason for your choice too.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 11:30
B.

restrictive clauses are generally specified using "that".
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 86
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 11:40
Duttsit,

Thanks for the quick response. I kinda knew this explanation but I am lost when it comes to differentiating a restrictive clause from a non-restrictive clause. Here if I use 'which' won't it explain the blood alcohol level?

how do we differentiate a non restrictive clause from a restrictive one?
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 11:56
amy_v wrote:
Duttsit,

Thanks for the quick response. I kinda knew this explanation but I am lost when it comes to differentiating a restrictive clause from a non-restrictive clause. Here if I use 'which' won't it explain the blood alcohol level?

how do we differentiate a non restrictive clause from a restrictive one?

most of the time, non-restrictive clause begins with comma (,). As implied, it is supposed to give additional information but sentence neverthless is correct even when you ommit it. Restrictive clase, as in this case, are required for sentence to make sense.
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1808
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 13:22
B.

Agree with duttsit's explaination. There is also a detailed explaination from Paul somewhere. I was unable to find out.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 18:42
The clause "constitutes drunk driving" should be a restrivtive clause; therefore, "that" should be used. We can eliminate d and e.

IMO, I believe "b" is wrong because "that constitutes drunk driving, ...." makes it look like non-restrivtive clasue.

I think the answer is A.

But since everyone is picking B over A, can someone explain to me why?
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2005, 16:47
B is correct as another that in A seems redundant.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 457
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 14:38
that vs which

that is restrictive in the sentence and I gow ith B
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 208
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 19:39
Can someone help me explain why withheld is suitable in B?
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1890
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 304 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2005, 19:55
amy_v wrote:
States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level that constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that witholds highway funds from those states that don't enforce the applicable standard.

b) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withholdsc) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withheld
d) which constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that withholds
e) which constitutes drunk driving because a federal law witholds

It is obvious that you have to make a choice between 'which' and 'that'. Please help me with the reason for your choice too.

taquanghai> you were reading C instead of B . Be careful coz the poster didn't re-type A in the answer choices

rigger> "States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level [u]that constitutes drunk driving[b] by a federal law" . The two bold parts look awkward if going together, don't they?! . A would be fine if it were " states are now given an incentive blah blah by the federal law....."
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5237
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 393 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2005, 05:31
I`ll go with (B). Because is necessary to properly complete the sentences intended meaning. S-V agreement: Federal law witholds
03 Dec 2005, 05:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Federal incentives now encourage investing capital in 3 18 Nov 2009, 00:48
Federal incentives now encourage investing capital in 4 26 Aug 2009, 11:02
1 Federal incentives now encourage investing capital in 4 18 Jul 2009, 18:03
Federal incentives now encourage investing capital in 2 17 Jan 2008, 03:29
Federal incentives now encourage investing capital in 2 24 Jul 2007, 01:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by