It is currently 28 Jun 2017, 13:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 20:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:04) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Statistics published by the US Department of Transportation show that nearly 80 percent of all traffic fatalities occur at speeds of under 50 miles per hour and within 25 miles of home. Therefore, you are safer in a car if you are driving at a speed over 50 miles per hour and not within a 25-mile radius of your home.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the conclusion of the argument above?
A) Teenage drivers are involved in 75 percent of all traffic accidents resulting in fatalities
B) Eigthy percent of all persons arrested for driving at a speed over the posted speed limit are intoxicated
C) Fifty percent of the nation's annual traffic fatalities occur on six weekends that are considered high-risk weekends because they contain holidays
D) The Department of Transportation statistics were based on police reports compiled by the 50 states
E) Ninety percent of all driving time is registered within a 25-miles radius of the driver's home and at speeds less than 50 miles per hour
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 20:42
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185
Location: illinois

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 21:47
by POE.....The answer I think is E
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 06:49
Nice, OA is E. Thought I would get at least 1 wrong answer here. Almost got Anandnk
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 08:01
Would anyone care to provide why E was choosen. Looks like E is very obvious answer but I didnt get it the first time.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 08:11
Yes indeed, any of the persons who chose E up to explain why it is good?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 293
Location: US

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 08:18
E) Ninety percent of all driving time is registered within a 25-miles radius of the driver's home and at speeds less than 50 miles per hour

If most fatalities occur within 25 miles of the driver's home and at speeds less than 50 miles per hour, and if 90% of driving time is spent within 25 miles of the driver's home and at speeds less than 50 miles per hour, then the driver is not safer. Even though he/she may drive on highways that are outside the 25 mile radius and with speeds higher than 50 miles per hour, 90% of his/her driving would still occur near his/her home.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 08:30
I thought of different explanation because the argument clearly says "if you drive in the area which is more than 25 miles away and above 50 mph"

The argument is kind of stupid because to go 25 miles away first you have to travel the first 25 miles. Even if you travel the first 25 miles under 50 MPH you are at a risk because the stats say that. So you are never safe. Since the argument is not sound we can just strengthen the stats and let it fall by itself. I believe E strengthens the statistics provided, basically making the author refute his/her claim.

Any further discussion on this ????
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 293
Location: US

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 08:34
Exactly, you would have to drive through the <25 mile radius to get to the highway so you can't be safer.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 10:14
E shows that the US Department of Transportation's data is biased towards traffic fatalities that occur at speeds of under 50 miles per hour and within 25 miles of home.
Let's take a number example. Total population under study is 10000.

Say you have 9000 who drive at a speed under 50 miles per hour and who live within 25 miles of home. --> Category 1

Then 1000 people under study do not fall under this category because they either drive faster than 50miles/hr or they live beyond 25 miles of home. --> Category 2

The above 2 categories are consistent with E which claims that 90% of all driving time is registered within a 25-miles radius of the driver's home and at speeds less than 50 miles per hour

If we say that there are 100 accidents and 80% of those accidents come from category 1, as the argument claims, then 80/9000 = .88% likelihood of having an accident.
Remainder 20%, 20 persons, will represent a likelihood of accident of: 20/1000 = 2% for category 2. Thus, does the conclusion that you are safer in a car if you are driving at a speed over 50 miles per hour and not within a 25-mile radius of your home (category 2) stand? The proof that there are more data "logged" under category 1, as E says, will clearly weaken the above conclusion
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

06 Apr 2004, 10:14
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making 0 07 Aug 2013, 10:49
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority 0 10 Jul 2013, 04:15
Doubling the cost of public transportation to compensate for 15 30 Aug 2011, 15:05
In order to ease the traffic congestion, the transport 1 02 Sep 2009, 00:25
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical 1 02 Jul 2007, 02:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by