GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 May 2019, 16:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 203
Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 15:35
3
14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (02:12) correct 30% (02:25) wrong based on 844 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder victims knew their assialants; in fact, 24 percent last year were killed by relatives. Nor was death always completely unexpected. In one study, about half the murder victims in a particular city had called for police protection at least five times during the 24 months before they were murdered. Nonetheless, most people are more likely to fear being killed by a stranger in an unfamiliar situation than by a friend or relative at home.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the attitude of most people to the likelihood of being murdered?

A. Statistics are likely to be discounted no matter what the source, if their implication seems to run counter to the common sense

B. In the face of such upsetting problems as murder and assault, most people are more likely to react emotionally rather than rationally

C. A study taken in only on city is not likely to have an effect on attitudes until similar studies have been undertaken at the national level and have yielded similar results.

D. Most people do not consider themselves to be in the high risk groups in which murder occurs frequently between relations, but they do see themselves as at least minimally susceptible to random violence.

E. People who seek police protection from relatives and friends are often unwilling to press charges once the emotions of the moment have cooled.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Posts: 28
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.91
WE: Information Technology (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Attitude towards being murdered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 16:18
D.
The only answer choice that explains why ppl are more afraid of strangers..
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1391
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Reviews Badge
Re: Attitude towards being murdered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 18:41
The answer is D, that is the only one that can be distilled out of the choices.
_________________
Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 408
Re: Attitude towards being murdered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 19:58
yes the answer is D . took almost 4 :00 min :(
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 159
Re: Attitude towards being murdered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2011, 20:28
D is the only one that could explain the behavior
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3390
Re: Attitude towards being murdered  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2011, 14:23
garimavyas wrote:
yes the answer is D . took almost 4 :00 min :(

is not difficult: loot at the stimulus ALWAYS carefully.

The statistics say that a lot of murder were committed by relatives BUT the conclusion say: people are scared by stranger murders (random word has that mean).

D is the choice. :) ;)
_________________
Hitotsubashi ICS Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 12
Re: Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2015, 10:28
carcass wrote:
garimavyas wrote:
yes the answer is D . took almost 4 :00 min :(

is not difficult: loot at the stimulus ALWAYS carefully.

The statistics say that a lot of murder were committed by relatives BUT the conclusion say: people are scared by stranger murders (random word has that mean).

D is the choice. :) ;)

Carcass,

I have a question about option B:

Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder victims knew their assialants; in fact, 24 percent last year were killed by relatives. Nor was death always completely unexpected. In one study, about half the murder victims in a particular city had called for police protection at least five times during the 24 months before they were murdered. Nonetheless, most people are more likely to fear being killed by a stranger in an unfamiliar situation than by a friend or relative at home.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the attitude of most people to the likelihood of being murdered?

A. Statistics are likely to be discounted no matter what the source, if their implication seems to run counter to the common sense

B. In the face of such upsetting problems as murder and assault, most people are more likely to react emotionally rather than rationally-->Does the observation that people don't react rationally to the situation of murder, be a possible reason why they would not respond the way they would be "expected" to respond? Or does this answer not qualify for the usage of "on the face of such..." assuming incorrectly that the reaction is only when faced with murder live? Please clarify. Thanks.

C. A study taken in only on city is not likely to have an effect on attitudes until similar studies have been undertaken at the national level and have yielded similar results.

D. Most people do not consider themselves to be in the high risk groups in which murder occurs frequently between relations, but they do see themselves as at least minimally susceptible to random violence.

E. People who seek police protection from relatives and friends are often unwilling to press charges once the emotions of the moment have cooled.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 145
Re: Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2015, 06:08
gmatcrook wrote:
Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder victims knew their assialants; in fact, 24 percent last year were killed by relatives. Nor was death always completely unexpected. In one study, about half the murder victims in a particular city had called for police protection at least five times during the 24 months before they were murdered. Nonetheless, most people are more likely to fear being killed by a stranger in an unfamiliar situation than by a friend or relative at home.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the attitude of most people to the likelihood of being murdered?

A. Statistics are likely to be discounted no matter what the source, if their implication seems to run counter to the common sense

B. In the face of such upsetting problems as murder and assault, most people are more likely to react emotionally rather than rationally

C. A study taken in only on city is not likely to have an effect on attitudes until similar studies have been undertaken at the national level and have yielded similar results.

D. Most people do not consider themselves to be in the high risk groups in which murder occurs frequently between relations, but they do see themselves as at least minimally susceptible to random violence.

E. People who seek police protection from relatives and friends are often unwilling to press charges once the emotions of the moment have cooled.


Initially selected E but E does not take the consideration about strangers.so correct answer iS D.
:)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2014
Posts: 45
Re: Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2015, 11:40
This is not an INFERENCE type, it looks like it is PARADOX question
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 21 Jul 2017
Posts: 190
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 4
WE: Project Management (Education)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2018, 06:53
Which of the following, if true, best explains the attitude of most people to the likelihood of being murdered?

A. Statistics are likely to be discounted no matter what the source, if their implication seems to run counter to the common sense too generic

B. In the face of such upsetting problems as murder and assault, most people are more likely to react emotionally rather than rationally emotionally rather than rationally??

C. A study taken in only on city is not likely to have an effect on attitudes until similar studies have been undertaken at the national level and have yielded similar results.out of scope

D. Most people do not consider themselves to be in the high risk groups in which murder occurs frequently between relations, but they do see themselves as at least minimally susceptible to random violence. True explains the paradox

E. People who seek police protection from relatives and friends are often unwilling to press charges once the emotions of the moment have cooled. out of scope
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55267
Re: Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 05:52
gmatcrook wrote:
Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder victims knew their assialants; in fact, 24 percent last year were killed by relatives. Nor was death always completely unexpected. In one study, about half the murder victims in a particular city had called for police protection at least five times during the 24 months before they were murdered. Nonetheless, most people are more likely to fear being killed by a stranger in an unfamiliar situation than by a friend or relative at home.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the attitude of most people to the likelihood of being murdered?

A. Statistics are likely to be discounted no matter what the source, if their implication seems to run counter to the common sense

B. In the face of such upsetting problems as murder and assault, most people are more likely to react emotionally rather than rationally

C. A study taken in only on city is not likely to have an effect on attitudes until similar studies have been undertaken at the national level and have yielded similar results.

D. Most people do not consider themselves to be in the high risk groups in which murder occurs frequently between relations, but they do see themselves as at least minimally susceptible to random violence.

E. People who seek police protection from relatives and friends are often unwilling to press charges once the emotions of the moment have cooled.


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



D

Most murder victims were killed by people they knew, yet most people are more likely to fear being killed by a stranger. The best way to explain this apparent contradiction is (D): Most people don't believe they fall into the high-risk groups containing murderous friends and relations, but they do think they could be victims of random violence.

As for (A), did these people find it counterintuitive that most murder victims knew their killers? We don't know, so we can't assume they dismissed the statistics. (B)'s too vague to explain the discrepancy. In light of the statistics, people's fear of strangers seems irrational, but is it emotional? A more emotional response might be to become terrified of being killed by one's spouse or best friend. (C) fails because national statistics already exist, as the first sentence makes clear. Finally, (E) might explain why people who knew they might be killed ended up dead, but it doesn't resolve the discrepancy at hand.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder   [#permalink] 08 Jan 2019, 05:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Statistics show that more than half of the nation's murder

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.