Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 21:48

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from

Author Message
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Sep 2005, 18:47
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturerâ€™s productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

I picked E! Why not C?
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 22
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Sep 2005, 19:49
E is already explicit in premise. I would go for 'C'.
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 898
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Sep 2005, 19:52
(E).

IMO (C) is wrong because arguments does not state that in the absence of stronger Patent law, productivity will decrease.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5218
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 404 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 00:22
C is wrong for two reasons.
1. It uses extreme language manufacturers WILL.... and
2. It is a classical 180 distractor. It mistakes the cause/effect relationship.

E all the way.
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 00:24
Oh yeah! I like the 180 distractor logic! Didnt see it there....
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1709
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 00:44
C is too strong hence E is the right choice.
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 178
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 00:49
I wud prefer E( for reasons stated above).

Krishna
13 Sep 2005, 00:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Federal law prohibits businesses from reimbursing 0 27 Jan 2017, 23:23
Intellectual property laws protect patent holders from 12 17 Jan 2011, 07:37
Since the invention of digital readout, machine designers 6 09 May 2008, 11:02
Naturally occurring chemicals cannot be newly patented once 6 05 Feb 2008, 14:54
2 Since the invention of digital readout, machine designers 3 29 Jan 2008, 19:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by