It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 280

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2011, 02:48
+1 for B.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 381 [0], given: 51

Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2011, 01:29
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Kudos [?]: 381 [0], given: 51

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2011, 09:27
good question , great explanation also
thank you , did not saw B as answer

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2012, 23:18
B

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Director
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 588 [0], given: 264

Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2012, 09:12
casual reasoning based Qn...
+1 B.( reversal is not true)
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Kudos [?]: 588 [0], given: 264

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 911 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2013, 20:25
Classic case of causal reasoning.

Stated relation is not reversed that weakens the argument.
So that possibility is highlighted and avoided by option (B).

Hence , (B).
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 911 [0], given: 322

Intern
Joined: 25 Nov 2013
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2014, 18:47
Between B and C

B) The programming content of NN IS ....more closely aligned.... Leads me to believe that it's more aligned because they changed their programming. Thus this answer supports the conclusion that more people switch to NN.

C) WW viewers liked NN better than WW. .......If they did like it, then why was the number of viewers lower in the first place?

I understand why C is correct, but I do feel like the tenses they used on the questions confused me.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 148

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 00:18
Go for B

Fact 1: the student argue with her parents
Fact 2: Her GPD declined
Conclusion: 1 --> 2
Assumption: if fact 2 caused fact 1, then we cannot conclude that fact 1 cause fact 2
_________________

.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 148

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4680

Kudos [?]: 17620 [0], given: 1986

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2015, 06:44
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple arguments with her parents over the course of the past year. Not surprisingly, her grade point average (GPA) over the same period showed a steep decline. This is just one example of a general truth: problematic family relationships can cause significant academic difficulties for our students.

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the general truism claimed by the Student Advisor?

A. Last year, the exchange student reduced the amount of time spent on academic work, resulting in a lower GPA.
B. The decline in the GPA of the exchange student was not the reason for the student's arguments with her parents.
C. School GPA is an accurate measure of a student's intellectual ability.
D. If proper measures are not taken, the decline in the student's academic performance may become irreversible.
E. Fluctuations in academic performance are typical for many students.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 17620 [0], given: 1986

Current Student
Status: Birds fly because they have wings, not because they have sky.
Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 216

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 73

Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: *700* Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2015, 09:49
Negating B reverses the cause and effect and subsequently the argument falls flat. Answer should B.
_________________

Regards,
J

--------------------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if I helped in some way!!!

Perseverance is the hard work you do after you get tired of doing the hard work you already did.

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 73

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 303

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 113

Re: *700* Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2015, 12:05
B for me tooo. Manhattan question !! nice one.

souvik101990 wrote:
Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple arguments with her parents over the course of the past year. Not surprisingly, her grade point average (GPA) over the same period showed a steep decline. This is just one example of a general truth: problematic family relationships can cause significant academic difficulties for our students. Which of the following is an assumption underlying the general truism claimed by the Student Advisor?

A. Last year, the exchange student reduced the amount of time spent on academic work, resulting in a lower GPA.

B. The decline in the GPA of the exchange student was not the reason for the student's arguments with her parents.

C. School GPA is an accurate measure of a student's intellectual ability.

D. If proper measures are not taken, the decline in the student's academic performance may become irreversible.

E. Fluctuations in academic performance are typical for many students.

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 113

Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 6

Re: *700* Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2015, 10:55
souvik101990 wrote:
Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple arguments with her parents over the course of the past year. Not surprisingly, her grade point average (GPA) over the same period showed a steep decline. This is just one example of a general truth: problematic family relationships can cause significant academic difficulties for our students. Which of the following is an assumption underlying the general truism claimed by the Student Advisor?

A. Last year, the exchange student reduced the amount of time spent on academic work, resulting in a lower GPA.

B. The decline in the GPA of the exchange student was not the reason for the student's arguments with her parents.

C. School GPA is an accurate measure of a student's intellectual ability.

D. If proper measures are not taken, the decline in the student's academic performance may become irreversible.

E. Fluctuations in academic performance are typical for many students.

My concern is that the argument with the parents happened during a period or a semester and the results declined when the result of that semester came i.e after this period or semester of the argument. Than option B is out of question since decline has happened after the arguments.

Can someone help?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 6

Director
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 586

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 231

Location: United States (LA)
Re: *700* Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2016, 13:47
use of negation on statement B breaks the link between assumption and conclusion completely .correct answer B

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 231

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10132

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2016, 13:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2016, 13:34
fluke wrote:
ankit1234suhane wrote:
assumption is link between premise and conclusion if that is true how come OA is B?. OA B is reversal of conclusion.
Pls explain

Two things happened:
1. The student scored low.
2. The student had arguments with her parents.

While these two evidences seem to be interdependent, they may very well not be.

The student may be scoring low because of a third reason; perhaps she wants to pursue a different career altogether. Perhaps the very cause that triggered event 1 above could have also triggered 2, who knows.

Just because we are presented with two events, we can't deduce that one occurred because of the other.

(B) just reiterates one of the possible assumptions. It's excluding the possibility that event 1 caused event 2. For the conclusion to be true, we must at least make this assumption. There may be 1000 other assumptions to become sure of the conclusion; however, B should be one among those. "After all, an assumption" is what's asked.

Ans: "B"

****************************************************
Note: "B" alone wouldn't be sufficient to validate the conclusion.

The conclusion in plain words is that 'Problems in personal relationships affect academic results'. But B says, that the arguments with family post decline in academic results was not reason for trouble with family'. Aren't the two contradicting each other.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2016, 22:07
parker wrote:
Great explanation fluke!

This is a classic type of assumption. Anytime you are presented with an observation about two events that CORRELATE, and the conclusion makes a CAUSAL claim, it's a very good idea to check that there were not alternate models of causation that could have explained the observed phenomenon.

Remember that you're looking for a *necessary* assumption for these arguments--without that assumption being true, the argument falls apart. As gmatpassion said above, if you negate choice B the conclusion will no longer hold. That means the positive version of the answer choice must have been necessary to uphold the conclusion. In this case, the argument makes a causal claim (family problems CAUSE academic difficulties) based on the observed correlation between one student's drop in GPA and that student's family difficulties. This observation is of two events that happened at the SAME TIME. CAUSATION, however, implies that one happened BEFORE the other and LED to the other. One possible explanation of the correlation is the conclusion mentioned, but it's just as possible that the reverse model of causation was true (or that some third unknown factor caused both...for example, what if the student developed a psychological disorder that affected both relationships and GPA?)

I don't recommend defaulting to negation for all five choices because it can take some time, but if you're down to 2 answers choices and are having a hard time figuring out which is necessary and which is merely "helpful," negation is a very powerful tool. Here, if we say that the GPA decline WAS the reason for the arguments, then it's not possible for the arguments to have been the reason for the GPA decline (as the original conclusion posits). This must be our answer.

Hi,
thanks for your helpful sulotion, but I am wondering why (C) is not correct. In this case, one of my brainstormed assuption is that "GPA can be the indicator for acedemic ability, which is the intellectual ability (is it right?)". So, when it comes to (C), it meets the assumption that GPA is the accurate measure of intellectual ability. Here, we can use the negation method. Then (C)'s negation is GPA is not the accurate measure of intellectual ability, and that clearly hurts the conclusion based on the above assumption. If GPA cannot reflect the academic ability, how can they say the lower GPA means academic difficulties? -----even stronger than (B)

Is there anything i misunderstood? Thanks for more explanation:)

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 8

Senior Manager
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 321

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 57

GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.5

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2016, 09:44
Jez0612 wrote:
parker wrote:
Great explanation fluke!

This is a classic type of assumption. Anytime you are presented with an observation about two events that CORRELATE, and the conclusion makes a CAUSAL claim, it's a very good idea to check that there were not alternate models of causation that could have explained the observed phenomenon.

Remember that you're looking for a *necessary* assumption for these arguments--without that assumption being true, the argument falls apart. As gmatpassion said above, if you negate choice B the conclusion will no longer hold. That means the positive version of the answer choice must have been necessary to uphold the conclusion. In this case, the argument makes a causal claim (family problems CAUSE academic difficulties) based on the observed correlation between one student's drop in GPA and that student's family difficulties. This observation is of two events that happened at the SAME TIME. CAUSATION, however, implies that one happened BEFORE the other and LED to the other. One possible explanation of the correlation is the conclusion mentioned, but it's just as possible that the reverse model of causation was true (or that some third unknown factor caused both...for example, what if the student developed a psychological disorder that affected both relationships and GPA?)

I don't recommend defaulting to negation for all five choices because it can take some time, but if you're down to 2 answers choices and are having a hard time figuring out which is necessary and which is merely "helpful," negation is a very powerful tool. Here, if we say that the GPA decline WAS the reason for the arguments, then it's not possible for the arguments to have been the reason for the GPA decline (as the original conclusion posits). This must be our answer.

Hi,
thanks for your helpful sulotion, but I am wondering why (C) is not correct. In this case, one of my brainstormed assuption is that "GPA can be the indicator for acedemic ability, which is the intellectual ability (is it right?)". So, when it comes to (C), it meets the assumption that GPA is the accurate measure of intellectual ability. Here, we can use the negation method. Then (C)'s negation is GPA is not the accurate measure of intellectual ability, and that clearly hurts the conclusion based on the above assumption. If GPA cannot reflect the academic ability, how can they say the lower GPA means academic difficulties? -----even stronger than (B)

Is there anything i misunderstood? Thanks for more explanation:)

Hello there , you are not following correct approach . Hope my explanation will help

Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple arguments with her parents over the course of the past year. Not surprisingly, her grade point average (GPA)over the same period showed a steep decline. This is just one example of a general truth: problematic family relationships can cause significant academic difficulties for our students.

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the general truism claimed by the Student Advisor?
(A) Last year, the exchange student reduced the amount of time spent on academic work, resulting in a lower GPA.
(B) The decline in the GPA of the. exchange student was not the reason for the student's arguments with her parents.
(C) School GPA is an accurate measure of a student's intellectual ability.
(D) If proper measures are not taken, the decline in the student's academic performance may become irreversible.
(E) Fluctuations in academic performance are typical for many students.

Conclusion here : This is just one example of a general truth: problematic family relationships can cause significant academic difficulties for our students.

assumption question requires statement that is required for the argument or conclusion to be true. So option C is irrelevant as it doesnt affect conclusion in any way whereas option B strengthens the conclusion by confirming that reason is not other way possible i.e. GPA decline is not the reason of argument .
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 57

Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2017, 04:14
Could someone please explain what the question about? I understood the argument fully but I got it wrong because I fail to identify the type of the question.
Thanks

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 13

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3197

Kudos [?]: 3506 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2017, 05:46
nawaf52 wrote:
Could someone please explain what the question about? I understood the argument fully but I got it wrong because I fail to identify the type of the question.
Thanks

This is a typical GMAT CR structure for assumption type questions. The generalisation of this structure is as follows:

Observation: A and B are seen to happen together.
Conclusion: A causes B

Assumption in the above conclusion: B does not cause A.

In the subject question,
A = Problematic family relation (argument with parents)
B = Academic difficulty (poor GPA).

Kudos [?]: 3506 [0], given: 22

Re: Student Advisor: One of our exchange students faced multiple   [#permalink] 26 Jan 2017, 05:46

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 39 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by