It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 16:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Student representative: Our university, in expelling a

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Student representative: Our university, in expelling a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2006, 11:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

9. Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verbally harassed his roommate, has erred by penalizing the student for doing what he surely has a right to do: speak his mind!
Dean of students: But what youâ€™re saying is that our university should endorse verbal harassment. Yet surely if we did that, we would threaten the free flow of ideas that is the essence of university life.
Which one of the following is a questionable technique that the dean of students uses in attempting to refute the student representative?
(A) challenging the student representativeâ€™s knowledge of the process by which the student was expelled
(B) invoking a fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior
(C) misdescribing the student representativeâ€™s position, thereby making it easier to challenge
(D) questioning the motives of the student representative rather than offering reasons for the conclusion defended
(E) relying on a position of power to silence the opposing viewpoint with a threat

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: CR on verbal harassment!!! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2006, 11:25
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
9. Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verbally harassed his roommate, has erred by penalizing the student for doing what he surely has a right to do: speak his mind!
Dean of students: But what youâ€™re saying is that our university should endorse verbal harassment. Yet surely if we did that, we would threaten the free flow of ideas that is the essence of university life.
Which one of the following is a questionable technique that the dean of students uses in attempting to refute the student representative?
(A) challenging the student representativeâ€™s knowledge of the process by which the student was expelled
(B) invoking a fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior
(C) misdescribing the student representativeâ€™s position, thereby making it easier to challenge

C seems to be the answer. What the student representative said has nothing do with stopping free flow of ideas. But the dean is putting the student in such a position.

(D) questioning the motives of the student representative rather than offering reasons for the conclusion defended
(E) relying on a position of power to silence the opposing viewpoint with a threat

_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 432

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2006, 11:25
I think its C here.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2006, 21:10
Argument Paraphrased.:
Student Rep: Freedom of speech should not be curtailed, even if it involves Verbal Abuse.
Dean: You are saying verbal abuse should be encouraged (endorsed)

The Dean highlights only one part of the student rep's argument making it sound like that part is actually the main point of the rep's argument.

B says it better than I do!!

Edited: Meant to say C, typed in B. Explanation still stands though!

Last edited by kripalkavi on 22 Nov 2006, 01:23, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2006, 23:23
Tricky one. going with C.

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: City

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2006, 23:38
I original went for B, but the other sorts of behavior piece makes me think that it is too vague, and the dean does not talk about other sorts of behaviour.

C talks about the Dean twisted the students arguement. So C seems to be the correct choice.

What the OA?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2006, 00:02
I think c is the ans here

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 301

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2006, 00:41
9. Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verbally harassed his roommate, has erred by penalizing the student for doing what he surely has a right to do: speak his mind!
Dean of students: But what youâ€™re saying is that our university should endorse verbal harassment. Yet surely if we did that, we would threaten the free flow of ideas that is the essence of university life.
Which one of the following is a questionable technique that the dean of students uses in attempting to refute the student representative?
(A) challenging the student representativeâ€™s knowledge of the process by which the student was expelled no mention of proceee
(B) invoking a fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior Based on undelined section
(C) misdescribing the student representativeâ€™s position, thereby making it easier to challenge Doesnot describ reps position
(D) questioning the motives of the student representative rather than offering reasons for the conclusion defended No mention of motive
(E) relying on a position of power to silence the opposing viewpoint with a threat There is no threat made

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2006, 01:39
prefer C.

the rep said 'free flow of ideas', but the dean said 'endorsement of the verbal harassment'. 2 different things.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2006, 06:23
OA is C!

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

23 Nov 2006, 06:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Student representative: Our university, in expelling a

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.