GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 20:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 280
Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2018, 05:52
1
2
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (01:10) correct 59% (01:25) wrong based on 230 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by cars when crossing streets in crosswalks more often than they are struck when crossing outside of crosswalks. This is because crosswalks give many pedestrians an overly strong sense of security that oncoming cars will follow the signals, and these pedestrians are less likely to look both ways before crossing the street.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the explanation proposed above?

A. The overwhelming majority of pedestrians in high-traffic areas cross streets in crosswalks.

B. The number of pedestrians struck by cars has increased in recent years.

C. Pedestrians tend to underestimate the chances that the signals at a crosswalk will malfunction.

D. Drivers are generally most alert to pedestrians who are in or near crosswalks.

E. Measures intended to promote safety tend to make people less cautious.
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 156
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2018, 06:07
Any one explain how to decide b/w A & C
_________________

--If you like my post pls give kudos

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2018, 08:20
I cannot understand how to eliminate the options. Can you provide an explanation for every option?
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2016
Posts: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.3
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2018, 08:41
1
tejyr wrote:
Any one explain how to decide b/w A & C

Choice C says that Pedestrians tend to underestimate that signals may malfunction. This is quite similar to what the author states that the pedestrians might overlook certain aspects of crossing the roads. Thus it’s not a great weakener.

However, choice A states that the quantum of traffic where people cross on the crosswalks is much more than when people cross outside of crosswalks. This gives a reason different from what the author states. The accidents are not because the pedestrians are less conscious. But the traffic plays a role in creating those accidents.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

"Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people to think they can't lose" - Bill Gates.

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2017
Posts: 50
Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2018, 23:42
1
IMO, this question belongs to very common category of CR GMAT questions.

For example,

#1 Statistics show that more car accidents happen within mile of driver's residence.
Why? because there most driving happens. No other silly reasons.
(This is taken from post of Magoosh expert Mike, I am not getting proper link)

#2 Report says Holiday season shows dramatic increase in no. of airplane accidents.
why? Because more flights are there during holidays.

#3 Another example (and I could find a link now)
https://gmatclub.com/forum/qotd-in-the- ... 56661.html

More Accidents/injuries happening == More use of things.

back to original question here,
I think the question fits this category, as overwhelming majority of pedestrians are on crossways in traffic.
so most accidents happen on crossways. Hence A.

please correct me if I am wrong.

Hope it helps!
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2018
Posts: 59
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2018, 10:07
I have a doubt about A though...it seems to give another reason why this general case is common in'high traffic areas' whereas the stimulus states a general case ( doesn't specify high or low traffic) . I don't think option C and the explanation in the stimulus are saying the same thing. The author says (paraphrased) people assume drivers will follow traffic rules, that means that people also assume the traffic lights will function well. Option C says what if the traffic lights malfunction? They are saying 2 different things. Pls help me out if my reasoning is wrong. Thanks.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2016
Posts: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.3
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2018, 20:25
Kem12 wrote:
I have a doubt about A though...it seems to give another reason why this general case is common in'high traffic areas' whereas the stimulus states a general case ( doesn't specify high or low traffic) . I don't think option C and the explanation in the stimulus are saying the same thing. The author says (paraphrased) people assume drivers will follow traffic rules, that means that people also assume the traffic lights will function well. Option C says what if the traffic lights malfunction? They are saying 2 different things. Pls help me out if my reasoning is wrong. Thanks.

Posted from my mobile device

If we want to look at the question in a very generalised way (just for the sake of understanding), let's say this:

The author blames pedestrians (blames is too strong a word and I am just using it for the sake of understanding) that they have an overly strong sense of security at the crosswalk.

Option C states that the pedestrians tend to underestimate that signals at the crosswalk will malfunction. This attitude of the pedestrians "may/may not" be because of "that" STRONG sense of security mentioned in the argument. Anyway, option C maintains that somehow, Pedestrians are responsible for what happens to them.

But if you look at Option A, it passes on the blame to HEAVY TRAFFIC. So maybe, pedestrians are doing nothing wrong. Maybe they don't have a strong sense of security, but still the accidents are happening. And because this option gives us another reason for pedestrians' accidents on the crosswalk, it makes sense.
_________________

"Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people to think they can't lose" - Bill Gates.

Director
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 522
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2018, 11:39
Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by cars when crossing streets in crosswalks more often than they are struck when crossing outside of crosswalks. This is because crosswalks give many pedestrians an overly strong sense of security that oncoming cars will follow the signals, and these pedestrians are less likely to look both ways before crossing the street.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the explanation proposed above?

A. The overwhelming majority of pedestrians in high-traffic areas cross streets in crosswalks.
Correct weakener, more number of people cross the road on crosswalk in high traffic.

B. The number of pedestrians struck by cars has increased in recent years.

C. Pedestrians tend to underestimate the chances that the signals at a crosswalk will malfunction.
does not fit in, there are better options available.so no the best weakener.

D. Drivers are generally most alert to pedestrians who are in or near crosswalks.
this strengthens

E. Measures intended to promote safety tend to make people less cautious.
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2017
Posts: 42
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2018, 12:19
AshutoshB wrote:
Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by cars when crossing streets in crosswalks more often than they are struck when crossing outside of crosswalks. This is because crosswalks give many pedestrians an overly strong sense of security that oncoming cars will follow the signals, and these pedestrians are less likely to look both ways before crossing the street.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the explanation proposed above?

A. The overwhelming majority of pedestrians in high-traffic areas cross streets in crosswalks.

B. The number of pedestrians struck by cars has increased in recent years.

C. Pedestrians tend to underestimate the chances that the signals at a crosswalk will malfunction.

D. Drivers are generally most alert to pedestrians who are in or near crosswalks.

E. Measures intended to promote safety tend to make people less cautious.

When we say something happens more often than another, it doesn't necessarily mean that the number of people that get hit at crosswalks is more than that who get hit away from crosswalks. It can also mean that the same person, when crossing on a crosswalks gets hit 5 times in a life time compared to say when he crosses without a crosswalk. The wording of the question can be improved.
Re: Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by &nbs [#permalink] 22 Sep 2018, 12:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Studies have shown that pedestrians are struck by

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.