It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 19:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 19 [4], given: 0

Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2008, 19:13
4
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:24) correct 57% (01:26) wrong based on 1200 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight than people who don’t keep track of what they eat. Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume. One study followed a group of patients who reported that they could not lose weight when consuming only 1,200 calories a day. The study found that the group consumed, on average, 47% more than it claimed and exercised 51% less. In contrast, when dieters record what they eat, their actual consumption more closely matches their reported consumption.

The two boldface portions in the argument above are best described by which of the following statements?

(A.) The first is a conclusion reached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
(B) The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
(C) The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competing theory.
(D) The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.
(E) The first introduces a theory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by lkothari on 23 Aug 2008, 19:26, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 19 [4], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 275

Kudos [?]: 53 [4], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2008, 00:46
4
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
lkothari wrote:
Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight than people who don’t keep track of what they eat. Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume. One study followed a group of patients who reported that they could not lose weight when consuming only 1,200 calories a day. The study found that the group consumed, on average, 47% more than it claimed and exercised 51% less. In contrast, when dieters record what they eat, their actual consumption more closely matches their reported consumption.

The two boldface portions in the argument above are best described by which of the following statements?

A. The first is a conclusion reached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
B. The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
C. The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competing theory.
D. The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.
E. The first introduces a theory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.

The paragraph starts with the reference to studies that point to the same conclusion. Then it discusses a particular study that is in line with the studies that are mentioned in the beginning.

A - the first is not a conclusion reached by the researchers. Even if it is, the second is not the evidence. Second is the result of a different independent study.

D - is the right choice. First is a premise that the researchers start with. Then the second is the result that proves that their opinion is correct.

Kudos [?]: 53 [4], given: 0

Manager
Status: Trying to get into the illustrious 700 club!
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 78

Kudos [?]: 24 [2], given: 58

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2010, 09:17
2
KUDOS
pmenon wrote:
i picked A since the first boldface seems to be a conclusion to me ...

I chose A too. Wouldn't it be a conclusion if I said "Studies have shown that without water life could not be sustained". Lastly, "The study found that.." makes it sound like evidence.

I do see how D could be correct. Can you tell me the source of this question?
_________________

I'm trying to not just answer the problem but to explain how I came up with my answer. If I am incorrect or you have a better method please PM me your thoughts. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 24 [2], given: 58

Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 864

Kudos [?]: 1110 [1], given: 33

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2008, 02:50
1
KUDOS
sanjay_gmat wrote:
lkothari wrote:
Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight than people who don’t keep track of what they eat. Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume. One study followed a group of patients who reported that they could not lose weight when consuming only 1,200 calories a day. The study found that the group consumed, on average, 47% more than it claimed and exercised 51% less. In contrast, when dieters record what they eat, their actual consumption more closely matches their reported consumption.

The two boldface portions in the argument above are best described by which of the following statements?

A. The first is a conclusion reached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
B. The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
C. The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competing theory.
D. The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.
E. The first introduces a theory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.

The paragraph starts with the reference to studies that point to the same conclusion. Then it discusses a particular study that is in line with the studies that are mentioned in the beginning.

A - the first is not a conclusion reached by the researchers. Even if it is, the second is not the evidence. Second is the result of a different independent study.

D - is the right choice. First is a premise that the researchers start with. Then the second is the result that proves that their opinion is correct.

Very good explanation.

Kudos [?]: 1110 [1], given: 33

Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 292 [1], given: 2

Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2009, 09:06
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight than people who don’t keep track of what they eat. Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume. One study followed a group of patients who reported that they could not lose weight when consuming only 1,200 calories a day. The study found that the group consumed, on average, 47% more than it claimed and exercised 51% less. In contrast, when dieters record what they eat, their actual consumption more closely matches their reported consumption.

The two boldface portions in the argument above are best described by which of the following statements?

A. The first is a conclusion reached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
B. The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
C. The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competing theory.
D. The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.
E. The first introduces a theory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.

Kudos [?]: 292 [1], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 89 [1], given: 3

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2010, 11:13
1
KUDOS
As soon as I read option A I didn't feel the need to go through the other options because option A seemed right to me. That is a huuuuuge mistake. Never ever do this. Examine every option before you pick any.

After realizing my mistake I read the ques properly and concluded that there is no conclusion in the argument. It is just a collection of facts.

In Researchers opinion, weight loss efforts fail because people eat more than they intend do. And they eat more because they do no keep track of how much they consume (which is what the studies claim). Also when dieters record their intake, they eat as much as they intend to. Hence Researchers opinion is based on bold-faced peortion 1.
Bold-faced portion 2 clearly indicates that Researchers opinion is correct because the group under study did not keep track of what they ate and how much they exercised and hence were unable to lose weight.

Kudos [?]: 89 [1], given: 3

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1124 [1], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2010, 08:28
1
KUDOS
I don't agree with D.
Although the first part is a premise, there is not an opinion. The researches are just reporting a finding in a study.

_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1124 [1], given: 109

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 6 [1], given: 9

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2010, 18:34
1
KUDOS
I initally chose A as well, but I can see why D is correct.

When "Studies show" something, that means its a fact/premise. I agree that this is not an opinion. But the next sentence "Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume" is definitely an opinion or theory.

And the 2nd boldface does illustrate that their theory/opinion is correct.

Good question.

Kudos [?]: 6 [1], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 458

Kudos [?]: 558 [1], given: 11

Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 07:26
1
KUDOS
(A.) The first is a conclusionreached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
The wording of the first sentence is an introduction of a topic by citing a result of the study... It is not a conlusion test... IF YOU ARE DOUBTFUL.. TRY THE BECAUSE LINKING TEST...
(a)People who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight BECAUSE Researchers believe that many fail...
(b)Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail BECAUSE people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight...

WHICH SEEMS LIKE A SUPPORT? WHICH SEEMS LIKE A CONCLUSION?

(B) The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
Results of a study is not a THEORY until established so...

(C) The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competingtheory.
The first did not illustrate any truth.. It just showed a known result... and the second is in harmony with the first...

(D) The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.

(E) The first introduces atheory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.[/quote]
The author agrees with the result....

_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Kudos [?]: 558 [1], given: 11

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1126

Kudos [?]: 3554 [1], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2013, 00:22
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
lkothari wrote:
Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight than people who don’t keep track of what they eat. Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume. One study followed a group of patients who reported that they could not lose weight when consuming only 1,200 calories a day. The study found that the group consumed, on average, 47% more than it claimed and exercised 51% less. In contrast, when dieters record what they eat, their actual consumption more closely matches their reported consumption.

The two boldface portions in the argument above are best described by which of the following statements?

(A.) The first is a conclusion reached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
(B) The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
(C) The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competing theory.
(D) The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.
(E) The first introduces a theory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.

This one is a good question to practice

For every CR question, determine conclusion correctly is always KEY. But it’s a bit easier if you have some signal words in mind to distinguish a conclusion form a premise.

*Signal words for premises –OR-- facts:
- The fact shows that…..
- For the reason that…..
- Due to…..
- Because…..
- For….
- Sine……
- For example……
- As indicated by…….

Signal words for Conclusions:
- Thus…..
- Therefore……
- Hence………
- Conclude that…….
- Believe that……
- For this reason……
- Shows that……

Note: if you see “studies shows that…… <-- normally, this is NOT a conclusion. Let ask yourself “what the studies, or scientific studies show? Absolutely, studies can ONLY show FACT, they can't conclude something. ONLY a person who does the studies can conclude”. But if you see “researchers show that….<-- This is a CONCLUSION because it concluded by people/scientists who have done studies.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Studies have shown that people who keep daily diet records are far more successful at losing weight than people who don’t keep track of what they eat.
Conclusion: Researchers believe that many weight-loss efforts fail because people eat more calories than they intend to consume.
Fact: One study followed a group of patients who reported that they could not lose weight when consuming only 1,200 calories a day. The study found that the group consumed, on average, 47% more than it claimed and exercised 51% less. In contrast, when dieters record what they eat, their actual consumption more closely matches their reported consumption.

(A.) The first is a conclusion reached by researchers; the second is evidence that that conclusion is correct.
Wrong. The first is NOT a conclusion. Why? See my note a above: The studies can’t conclude something. Only a person who does the studies can conclude. The studies only show FACTS.

(B) The first is an explanation of why a certain theory is thought to be true; the second is an example of research results that support this theory.
Wrong. The first is NOT an explanation of a theory. Clearly, you see the second sentence: Researchers believe that…….. because……… <== The exist of “because” clearly tells you the first is NOT the explanation for what researchers believe. The first sentence is ONLY FACT, NOT explanation.

(C) The first is an example illustrating the truth of a certain theory; the second is a competing theory.
Wrong. The second does not compete the first.

(D) The first is a premise upon which the researchers base their opinion; the second illustrates that their opinion is correct.
Correct 100%. The first is the FACT and clearly is a PREMISE. The second one more time illustrate what researchers believe is TRUE.

(E) The first introduces a theory that the researchers have disproved; the second is the basis for the researchers’ argument.
Wrong. The first actually supports the main conclusion, NOT disprove.

TAKEAWAY:
Always have some magic words (signal words) in mind to help determine a correct conclusion.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3554 [1], given: 123

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2008, 19:18
D

researchers opinion is based on the study (the first bold part) and this opinion is supported by the evidence (2nd bold part)

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2008, 20:43
i picked A since the first boldface seems to be a conclusion to me ...

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 429

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2008, 23:54
IMO A)

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2008, 12:14
IMO D since the first part is a premise and the 2nd part is an illustration to support it.

Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2008, 15:59
I go with A...

Whats the OA ?

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2008, 22:43
OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2009, 09:27
IMO A

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 93

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 6

Location: India
Schools: LBS

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2009, 10:12
Was between A and D.

I think A is a better choice.
_________________

The Legion dies, it does not surrender.

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2009, 11:13
"D" for me. in A- the first bold statement is not the "conclusion" if the the second is considered "evidence" for the same.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 256

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2009, 11:29
IMO A

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 4

Re: Fat People   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2009, 11:29

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 79 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by