GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Aug 2019, 04:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Posts: 109
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Reviews Badge
Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2017, 20:55
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (02:06) correct 26% (02:27) wrong based on 293 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008 create nearly twice as much carbon emission as newer refrigerated trucks built using energy-efficient technology. As a result, the European Union has decreed that it will no longer grant licenses to these older trucks upon resale. Since refrigerated trucks are frequently sold from larger trucking companies with the means to upgrade technology to smaller trucking companies that keep costs low by exclusively purchasing in the resale market, this program will reduce the amount of global carbon emission coming from refrigerated trucks.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?


A. While popular in the European Union, this program has not been adopted by any other governing bodies.

B. The European Union only accounts for 18% of the world’s refrigerated trucking, as defined by the number of kilometers driven by refrigerated trucks each year.

C. In light of this announcement, larger trucking companies in the European Union are planning to resell their old refrigerated trucks to companies based outside of the European Union.

D. Some refrigerated trucks that operate within the European Union are licensed by countries that are not members of the European Union.

E. Experts predict that a significant percentage of refrigerated transport will shift from trucks to trains as companies attempt to comply with the new regulation.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Posts: 177
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2017, 11:10
Can someone explain the OA?

IMO if the trucks are selling to countries outside the European Union, the statement strengthens the argument (that emission will indeed be reduced)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 82
Concentration: Leadership, Finance
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2017, 11:20
1
pra1785 wrote:
Can someone explain the OA?

IMO if the trucks are selling to countries outside the European Union, the statement strengthens the argument (that emission will indeed be reduced)


The passage is about global carbon emission. So selling trucks outside of EU does not reduce the global carbon emission. Ironically as new energy efficient trucks are introduced in EU the global carbon emission will actually increase.
Hope this helps.
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3603
Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2017, 11:23
1
pra1785 wrote:
Can someone explain the OA?

IMO if the trucks are selling to countries outside the European Union, the statement strengthens the argument (that emission will indeed be reduced)


Hi pra1785 ,

Here you missed an important word "global".

Look at the conclusion below:

this program will reduce the amount of global carbon emission coming from refrigerated trucks.

It doesn't matter where you are selling. It will still remain on this earth. :P
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1208
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 12:46
Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008 create nearly twice as much carbon emission as newer refrigerated trucks built using energy-efficient technology. As a result, the European Union has decreed that it will no longer grant licenses to these older trucks upon resale. Since refrigerated trucks are frequently sold from larger trucking companies with the means to upgrade technology to smaller trucking companies that keep costs low by exclusively purchasing in the resale market, this program will reduce the amount of global carbon emission coming from refrigerated trucks.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. While popular in the European Union, this program has not been adopted by any other governing bodies. -Even if this program was adopted by any other governing body, the truck owners would have sold the trucks to some other country where the program had not been implemented.
B. The European Union only accounts for 18% of the world’s refrigerated trucking, as defined by the number of kilometers driven by refrigerated trucks each year. -We are not worried about the proportion of EU
C. In light of this announcement, larger trucking companies in the European Union are planning to resell their old refrigerated trucks to companies based outside of the European Union. -Correct. These companies can resell in other countries where the program hasn't been implemented.
D. Some refrigerated trucks that operate within the European Union are licensed by countries that are not members of the European Union. -Okay. Its a fact set. Irrelevant
E. Experts predict that a significant percentage of refrigerated transport will shift from trucks to trains as companies attempt to comply with the new regulation. -This actually strengthens the argument but giving us an alternative.
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Jan 2017
Posts: 9
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2017, 09:01
pra1785 wrote:
Can someone explain the OA?

IMO if the trucks are selling to countries outside the European Union, the statement strengthens the argument (that emission will indeed be reduced)


A irrelevant
B irrelevant
C If large companies sell their old trucks out of europe region, global pollution will not reduce
D some old trucks will still hold licence and still produce pollution, but total amount of pollution will be reduced.
E out of scope
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1208
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2017, 09:26
HarpreetSinghBajwa wrote:
pra1785 wrote:
Can someone explain the OA?

IMO if the trucks are selling to countries outside the European Union, the statement strengthens the argument (that emission will indeed be reduced)


A irrelevant
B irrelevant
C If large companies sell their old trucks out of europe region, global pollution will not reduce
D some old trucks will still hold licence and still produce pollution, but total amount of pollution will be reduced.
E out of scope


Hi,

You yourself gave the answer. Since we need to weaken the argument, option C weakens it correctly by saying that the pollution won't reduce.

Regards
_________________
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57191
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2018, 07:38
gauravraos wrote:
Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008 create nearly twice as much carbon emission as newer refrigerated trucks built using energy-efficient technology. As a result, the European Union has decreed that it will no longer grant licenses to these older trucks upon resale. Since refrigerated trucks are frequently sold from larger trucking companies with the means to upgrade technology to smaller trucking companies that keep costs low by exclusively purchasing in the resale market, this program will reduce the amount of global carbon emission coming from refrigerated trucks.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?


A. While popular in the European Union, this program has not been adopted by any other governing bodies.

B. The European Union only accounts for 18% of the world’s refrigerated trucking, as defined by the number of kilometers driven by refrigerated trucks each year.

C. In light of this announcement, larger trucking companies in the European Union are planning to resell their old refrigerated trucks to companies based outside of the European Union.

D. Some refrigerated trucks that operate within the European Union are licensed by countries that are not members of the European Union.

E. Experts predict that a significant percentage of refrigerated transport will shift from trucks to trains as companies attempt to comply with the new regulation.


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:



The key to this problem is noticing the word "global" in the conclusion, "this program will reduce the amount of global carbon emission coming from refrigerated trucks."

The EU plans to cut (global) carbon emissions by refusing to license these older trucks, which are typically sold from larger companies to smaller companies. What is the intermediate effect? Smaller companies will be forced to buy new trucks, because they just won't have the option to purchase older trucks without the ability to get them licensed. This, then, should take the older trucks off the road.

But there's one huge problem with that: the refusal to license older trucks only exists in the European Union, meaning that it doesn't have jurisdiction over global carbon emissions. So one way to weaken the argument is to exploit that and show that the older trucks will continue to operate, just outside the European Union. Choice C does exactly that: the larger companies will still sell the trucks, just a little further away, and carbon will continue to be emitted somewhere in the world. Choice C then is correct.

Choices A, B, and D are all incorrect for essentially the same reason, again related to the specificity of the conclusion. Note that the goal isn't to eliminate carbon emissions, just to reduce it. So even if this policy were to only get rid of the trucks in the EU, it would still meet its goal of reducing global emissions. Beware that trap in problems that involve plans/strategies: saying that the plan won't be as effective as it could be doesn't necessarily weaken its goal of creating some change. And choice E actually, if anything, strengthens the argument, by showing that companies plan to get away from trucks.
_________________
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5201
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2019, 23:24
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2019, 23:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Studies have shown that refrigerated trucks manufactured prior to 2008

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne